Robert B. Marks said:
So, I've never had any serious problems with the police where I come from...but I'm also about as white as you can get, and I'm from Canada, which does not have an overly militarized police. Having seen a lot of news reports about the militarizing of police in the United States, as well as some shocking footage of shootings, I've got a couple of questions I'd love to ask:
1. Do you find yourself viewing the public more as people to be protected or possible threats?
2. If there is a scale with policeman on one side, and soldier on the other, do you feel that the balance has swung a bit too far towards soldier?
I dunno about Canada not having a militarized police. Those Mounties do not play.
But for your questions:
1. It's funny, because in training they do harp a lot on threat awareness and watching people and the overall impression is that anyone could suddenly turn hostile. Which is true to an extent. It's amazing the wide variety of people who just switch over to full on attack mode, though mental illness and substance abuse form a good chunk of that. But once you're out of the academy, and you begin to fall into the pattern of "beat responsibility", you start to get an appreciation for who the trouble is, but also for who the honest folks just trying to avoid that trouble are while they eke by. Officers who take the time to get to know their beat folks tend to develop a sort of paternalistic protectiveness of "their people".
2. I've never been a soldier, so I'm not sure I can answer that accurately. I will point out that from my side, the issue with police militarization isn't the equipment that police are getting, but rather unnecessary deployment of paramilitary units (SWAT teams). Your average patrol guy is gonna be driving a family size sedan, have a regular uniform, maybe cargo pockets, wear a nametag, and have a visible badge number.