Some Reasons Scott Pilgrim is a Box Office Failure

Recommended Videos

GameGoddess101

New member
Jun 11, 2009
241
0
0
NOTE: I haven't seen Scott Pilgrim yet (I'm probably going to on Tuesday) but you don't need to be a genius to see why it failed. These are just a couple of theories of mine. If you have any, feel free to pipe in an say so!!

Reason 1: It was advertised wrong. Seriously, the guy who put these trailers together needs to be fired, from what I can understand, because it gave no incentive for anyone to see the movie. The trailers made it look like a dull, stupid cash-grab at the gamer market when, if you look at the graphic novels, it's SOO much more. But no, all we saw was stupid, arbitrary gamer references and pee-bars.

Reason 2: Michael Cera was in it. After this, expect to never see Cera in a lead role ever again. The world has spoken and we are tired of Michael Cera. He had some limited success because of Juno, but when he was cast in the same damn role playing the same damn range over and over again, we got tired of him. He can no longer draw audiences, if he isn't just driving them away/

Reason 3: It's about 20 years too late. Seriously, I have a feeling it would have been successful in the 90s. It has a lot of anachronistic references, like the Zelda music and all that fun stuff. It feels more like a movie that really should have been made in the 90s, but people just didn't want to put up with it.

Reason 4: It's target audience. First off, the target audience of Scott Pilgrim was never really found through the advertisements and trailers. But even if it had, I still have a feeling it wouldn't have done well in first-run theaters. First off, it's target audience is the "geek" market from 18-24...ish. People going to movies in first run theaters aren't this audience. They're either parents taking their squealing children to Toy Story and Despicable Me, or they're late 20-30 somethings going to see The Expendables.

So what's the future look like for Scott Pilgrim? Well, it's in second-run theaters where I am, so it might have some mild success there. I have a feeling it will find its audience and do well on DVD, like many have predicted.

What's your take? What do you believe will happen to Scott Pilgrim? Why do you think it failed in the box offices??
 

wooty

Vi Britannia
Aug 1, 2009
4,252
0
0
Pilgrim was pulled from my cinema after just 4 days or so, not seen a lot of it since then. But I did think it was boring and maybe, for lack of a better expression, "trying too hard". Thank Haruhi that I didnt pay to see it.
 

Siberian Relic

New member
Jan 15, 2010
190
0
0
I'm most inclined to side with your second point. I really, really can't stand that kid, and I don't think I've actually seen him in anything apart from the trailers and ads for his movies. His parts strike me as one-note affairs. I think he's going down the same road as Megan Fox, albeit in a geeky, more protracted fashion.
 

Frequen-Z

Resident Batman fanatic.
Apr 22, 2009
1,351
0
0
You want to know why I didn't give it my money and go see it?

I'm tired of seeing Michael Cera chase a girl for 90 minutes. So yeah, Reason 2.
 

Girl With One Eye

HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA
Jun 2, 2010
1,528
0
0
I agree with your point on the advertising, to be honest I had no desire to see this film until I saw all the fuss about it on the escapist (however I'm still unsure if I'll watch it or not). Not really sure if Michael Cera has much to do with it though, is he really that hated already?
 

Virus49

New member
Jul 7, 2009
188
0
0
Me and a bunch of my friends thought it was the most awesome thing we have seen in a long time. I wouldnt say that we were gamer/geek type people. But just blown away by the fight scenes and some good, quite simply fun moments. Go vegan police!

Im gonna get flamed to hell for saying this... but I liked Michael Cera in the role too. And where I live its getting more well known. I have seen it twice. Once on release day where the cinema was empty and once two weeks later. The cinema was full.

Id agree that the wrong trailer was released. The one I originally saw was the 2 and a half min trailer that would obviously never go on tv. That captured the film. It was great.
 

Wrists

New member
May 26, 2010
228
0
0
I would probably agree with you, I really enjoyed it, but I would never have gone to see it if I hadn't watched the Escape to the Movies review. Also, I really dislike Michael Cera. So reasons 1 and 2 are what I would say were the big ones.
 

bicepfetishist1

New member
Sep 3, 2010
18
0
0
I agree with all the OPs reasoning... Also 18-24 'nerd' demo is pretty good at downloading anything that interests them illegally. You can't be butt hurt when this trend effects the box office of movies you want to see succeed. LOL.

Also...a generation has spoken and Cera clearly isn't the face of it.

Bottom line...it was advertised wrong to people that didn't know anything about it. While people that did know about the comics didn't just obdiently march into the theatre's to see it out of loyalty to the comics series.
 

GameGoddess101

New member
Jun 11, 2009
241
0
0
Virus49 said:
Im gonna get flamed to hell for saying this... but I liked Michael Cera in the role too.
I didn't say I didn't like Michael Cera in the role, even though I haven't seen it yet. I'm just saying the audience in and of itself doesn't want to see Cera play the same role again, as that has been the majority of his resume. But I've heard this is different and that he actually exerts some range here, so I'm on the fence how I feel about Cera right now.
 

Danzaivar

New member
Jul 13, 2004
1,967
0
0
I disagree on the 20 years ago comment. This movie NEEDED to have good special fx, that just wouldn't have happened or it would have been a 'so bad its good' movie. Basically they just pitched a movie to an audience, then stuck an actor that audience hates in the lead role. He made a good Scott Pilgrim (imo) but the demographic just doesn't like him...
 

GameGoddess101

New member
Jun 11, 2009
241
0
0
rollerfox88 said:
Personally, I thought it was well advertised and a great film. While I agree that Cera usually plays the same guy, I don't think he's used it up yet, and this was at least a little different. If you want to see him not chasing a girl, you should google Clark and Michael...

Can't be bothered to check where you're all from, but this isn't a USA/England thing is it? (I'm England...)
I'm in the US. I can't speak for you guys, but we had some pretty shit-tastic trailers. Maybe you had better advertising. I dunno.
 
Apr 28, 2008
14,634
0
0
First two are spot-on for me. The trailers were crappy, and I hate Cera. 3 and 4 I can't really comment on, since in 3 I was young and didn't care and in 4 I do go to the movies opening weekend for certain movies. Those movies are Pixar movies.

But yeah, first two reasons are basically why I avoided this movie.
 

WindKnight

Quiet, Odd Sort.
Legacy
Jul 8, 2009
1,828
9
43
Cephiro
Country
United Kingdom
Gender
Female
GameGoddess101 said:
NOTE: I haven't seen Scott Pilgrim yet (I'm probably going to on Tuesday) but you don't need to be a genius to see why it failed. These are just a couple of theories of mine. If you have any, feel free to pipe in an say so!!

Reason 1: It was advertised wrong. Seriously, the guy who put these trailers together needs to be fired, from what I can understand, because it gave no incentive for anyone to see the movie. The trailers made it look like a dull, stupid cash-grab at the gamer market when, if you look at the graphic novels, it's SOO much more. But no, all we saw was stupid, arbitrary gamer references and pee-bars.

Reason 2: Michael Cera was in it. After this, expect to never see Cera in a lead role ever again. The world has spoken and we are tired of Michael Cera. He had some limited success because of Juno, but when he was cast in the same damn role playing the same damn range over and over again, we got tired of him. He can no longer draw audiences, if he isn't just driving them away/

Reason 3: It's about 20 years too late. Seriously, I have a feeling it would have been successful in the 90s. It has a lot of anachronistic references, like the Zelda music and all that fun stuff. It feels more like a movie that really should have been made in the 90s, but people just didn't want to put up with it.

Reason 4: It's target audience. First off, the target audience of Scott Pilgrim was never really found through the advertisements and trailers. But even if it had, I still have a feeling it wouldn't have done well in first-run theaters. First off, it's target audience is the "geek" market from 18-24...ish. People going to movies in first run theaters aren't this audience. They're either parents taking their squealing children to Toy Story and Despicable Me, or they're late 20-30 somethings going to see The Expendables.

So what's the future look like for Scott Pilgrim? Well, it's in second-run theaters where I am, so it might have some mild success there. I have a feeling it will find its audience and do well on DVD, like many have predicted.

What's your take? What do you believe will happen to Scott Pilgrim? Why do you think it failed in the box offices??
I have to ask... are you the distressed watcher, or have you just ripped off one of his videos?

http://thatguywiththeglasses.com/videolinks/teamt/dw/skitches/27623-dw-5reasonswhyscottpilgrimflopped
 

AugustFall

New member
May 5, 2009
1,110
0
0
I thought Michael Cera did a really good job in the movie, I thought it was funny and enjoyed the characters.

The main problem I would say is that the target audience doesn't go to theatres.
 

Kingemoney

New member
Dec 5, 2009
93
0
0
I have to agree with all of these. I flat-out REFUSED to go see this movie, on the basis that A.) It appeared, from the trailers, to be a shameless attempt to reach into geek's pockets. Some of my friends were goddamned salivating over this movie. Why? Because they play bass guitar, and so does Scott Pilgrim. B.) I don't care about anything with Michael Cera in it. I didn't even think he was good in Arrested Development, which I liked.
 

TheRundownRabbit

Wicked Prolapse
Aug 27, 2009
3,826
0
0
I have to admit they could have picked someone better than Michael Cera, after reading the books you start to think that Michael Cera couldnt play the part