some things every man should know how to do

Recommended Videos

Ledan

New member
Apr 15, 2009
798
0
0
XHolySmokesX said:
Attempt to carry as much weight as possible.

I work at a shop that sells 15Kg bags of sand. Now, Im not a bulky guy, i've always been pretty skinny, so carrying a lot of weight is something i probably shouldn't do often. So that's exactly what i tried to do, i managed to carry 4 bags of sand (60kg) across my arms and walk a good 25 meters to the customer with them, granted i nearly spraned my back, but it was worth it becasue i felt like a man!!!!
My dad did that, well on a volunteer farm, and sprained his back. 20 years later, his back hurts all the time. Soooo..... not such a smart plan :p
 

loc978

New member
Sep 18, 2010
4,900
0
0
orangeban said:
loc978 said:
...well, the only thing on the list I can't do well is ride a horse. I'm more apt to kill and eat one. Between my own two feet and a bicycle, though, I can outpace most horses through any terrain except open grassy plains... and I hate open grassy plains (fortunately, I don't live near any).
I'd be amazed if you could out-run a (decently fit) horse on foot. On a bike I could believe (presuming you were a very good bike rider) but no way could you beat one in a foot race.
Over what terrain? On pavement or packed dirt, that's why I mentioned the bike (I can maintain about 25mph for a few miles on level ground). Through thick undergrowth and trackless forest, I can certainly outpace a horse. Up the side of a cliff, they can't even follow me. Across a river, same thing. That pretty much covers all of the terrain around here. Horses are next to useless where I live.
 

voetballeeuw

New member
May 3, 2010
1,359
0
0
Every man should know how to tie their shoes. Once I see a fellow gentleman with velcro straps on his feet, I immediately despise him.
 

Heronblade

New member
Apr 12, 2011
1,204
0
0
loc978 said:
...well, the only thing on the list I can't do well is ride a horse. I'm more apt to kill and eat one. Between my own two feet and a bicycle, though, I can outpace most horses through any terrain except open grassy plains... and I hate open grassy plains (fortunately, I don't live near any).
A horse in excellent physical condition can cover 100 miles or more in about 10 hours, with the burden of a rider. In simply average condition, 25-50 miles would be easily attainable in about half that time. A human in excellent physical condition walking nonstop for 12 hours would be lucky to hit 50 miles.
 

loc978

New member
Sep 18, 2010
4,900
0
0
Heronblade said:
loc978 said:
...well, the only thing on the list I can't do well is ride a horse. I'm more apt to kill and eat one. Between my own two feet and a bicycle, though, I can outpace most horses through any terrain except open grassy plains... and I hate open grassy plains (fortunately, I don't live near any).
A horse in excellent physical condition can cover 100 miles or more in about 10 hours, with the burden of a rider. In simply average condition, 25-50 miles would be easily attainable in about half that time. A human in excellent physical condition walking nonstop for 12 hours would be lucky to hit 50 miles.
Yet on a bicycle, a human in excellent condition can easily travel the same distance as your horse in 10 hours. 10mph is easy to maintain all day. Plus, if that human encounters a barrier that the horse can't traverse (as one is wont to do every ten feet or so where I live), he can carry his bike across it.
 

orangeban

New member
Nov 27, 2009
1,442
0
0
loc978 said:
orangeban said:
loc978 said:
...well, the only thing on the list I can't do well is ride a horse. I'm more apt to kill and eat one. Between my own two feet and a bicycle, though, I can outpace most horses through any terrain except open grassy plains... and I hate open grassy plains (fortunately, I don't live near any).
I'd be amazed if you could out-run a (decently fit) horse on foot. On a bike I could believe (presuming you were a very good bike rider) but no way could you beat one in a foot race.
Over what terrain? On pavement or packed dirt, that's why I mentioned the bike (I can maintain about 25mph for a few miles on level ground). Through thick undergrowth and trackless forest, I can certainly outpace a horse. Up the side of a cliff, they can't even follow me. Across a river, same thing. That pretty much covers all of the terrain around here. Horses are next to useless where I live.
Through forest and thick undergrowth there'd be sections where a horse would slow but it would beat you because of the speed it can hit clear sections, climbing a cliff, well that's not very fair and I would be willing to bet a really fit horse could beat you on a pack over packed dirt, definetly in an endurance.
 

alandavidson

New member
Jun 21, 2010
961
0
0
crimson5pheonix said:
?A human being should be able to change a diaper, plan an invasion, butcher a hog, conn a ship, design a building, write a sonnet, balance accounts, build a wall, set a bone, comfort the dying, take orders, give orders, cooperate, act alone, solve equations, analyze a new problem, pitch manure, program a computer, cook a tasty meal, fight efficiently, die gallantly. Specialization is for insects.? -Robert A. Heinlein

Word.
That's from tunnel in the sky isn't it?

OT: Your list is pretty good.
 

LadyMint

New member
Apr 22, 2010
327
0
0
Lawnmooer said:
Do something without looking at the instruction manual.
As an experienced Customer Service Representative, I think both men and women should know how to read instruction manuals and reference them for getting certain things done. It would be great if they weren't needed at all, but to me it shows a great aptitude for a person to leaf through the instruction booklet that came with their device/thing that needs to be built and use it to help them accomplish something (building furniture, setting up your mobile phone, etc.) without needing to call someone. I find that a lot of people unwrap their shiny new toys and toss the instruction booklets aside, only to become confused and/or frustrated when they can't figure out how to do something on their own. It doesn't hurt to reference the manual, and IMHO, more people could stand to do so.
 

MadeinHell

New member
Jun 18, 2009
656
0
0
I think you forgot about something very important in the whole "being a man" thing.

Every man should know how to breed... you know, how to create little people :p.

PS: Man should also be able to ask for directions if he needs to. No need for being all "I'm TOTALLY NOT LOST" in a place where nobody knows you ;P.
 

Cheesus333

New member
Aug 20, 2008
2,523
0
0
I resent the idea that I should be able to do anything based solely on my gender. But hey, I can do most of those things at the age of 16 anyway.
 

loc978

New member
Sep 18, 2010
4,900
0
0
orangeban said:
loc978 said:
orangeban said:
loc978 said:
...well, the only thing on the list I can't do well is ride a horse. I'm more apt to kill and eat one. Between my own two feet and a bicycle, though, I can outpace most horses through any terrain except open grassy plains... and I hate open grassy plains (fortunately, I don't live near any).
I'd be amazed if you could out-run a (decently fit) horse on foot. On a bike I could believe (presuming you were a very good bike rider) but no way could you beat one in a foot race.
Over what terrain? On pavement or packed dirt, that's why I mentioned the bike (I can maintain about 25mph for a few miles on level ground). Through thick undergrowth and trackless forest, I can certainly outpace a horse. Up the side of a cliff, they can't even follow me. Across a river, same thing. That pretty much covers all of the terrain around here. Horses are next to useless where I live.
Through forest and thick undergrowth there'd be sections where a horse would slow but it would beat you because of the speed it can hit clear sections, climbing a cliff, well that's not very fair and I would be willing to bet a really fit horse could beat you on a pack over packed dirt, definetly in an endurance.

 

Smooth Operator

New member
Oct 5, 2010
8,162
0
0
Ledan said:
XHolySmokesX said:
Attempt to carry as much weight as possible.

I work at a shop that sells 15Kg bags of sand. Now, Im not a bulky guy, i've always been pretty skinny, so carrying a lot of weight is something i probably shouldn't do often. So that's exactly what i tried to do, i managed to carry 4 bags of sand (60kg) across my arms and walk a good 25 meters to the customer with them, granted i nearly spraned my back, but it was worth it becasue i felt like a man!!!!
My dad did that, well on a volunteer farm, and sprained his back. 20 years later, his back hurts all the time. Soooo..... not such a smart plan :p
Well that brings us onto another one:
- a man should know his limits
 

orangeban

New member
Nov 27, 2009
1,442
0
0
loc978 said:
orangeban said:
loc978 said:
orangeban said:
loc978 said:
...well, the only thing on the list I can't do well is ride a horse. I'm more apt to kill and eat one. Between my own two feet and a bicycle, though, I can outpace most horses through any terrain except open grassy plains... and I hate open grassy plains (fortunately, I don't live near any).
I'd be amazed if you could out-run a (decently fit) horse on foot. On a bike I could believe (presuming you were a very good bike rider) but no way could you beat one in a foot race.
Over what terrain? On pavement or packed dirt, that's why I mentioned the bike (I can maintain about 25mph for a few miles on level ground). Through thick undergrowth and trackless forest, I can certainly outpace a horse. Up the side of a cliff, they can't even follow me. Across a river, same thing. That pretty much covers all of the terrain around here. Horses are next to useless where I live.
Through forest and thick undergrowth there'd be sections where a horse would slow but it would beat you because of the speed it can hit clear sections, climbing a cliff, well that's not very fair and I would be willing to bet a really fit horse could beat you on a pack over packed dirt, definetly in an endurance.

Hmm, depends on the type of horse really... I know they're not horses but I've met a few trecking ponies who could at least have a good stab at getting through that.
 

Katana314

New member
Oct 4, 2007
2,299
0
0
Let's see how well I stack up...

✓Fire a gun (We've all watched enough action movies. Can't say my shoulder will feel okay after the first magazine though.)
-Fish
-Hunt [Dr_Horrible]
-Gut a fish/skin an animal
✓Cook a few easy recipes
-Throw a punch
✓Take a punch (not too hard. Not that it won't be painful...)
✓Read
✓Build something
-Drink (I'm 21 and still can't find any alcohol I like.)
-Sing or play some kind of instrument
✓Use basic tools (Axes, saws, hammers & nails, screw drivers, the basic tool kit)
✓Talk to others
-Talk to someone you're attracted to (I wonder if this counts. I can talk to them, but they won't be interested in me. I should know - unlike many, I have tried.)
✓Play Chess (just know how the pieces move, you don't need to be a grand master)
✓Play poker
-Dance
-Know how to grow a decent garden
✓Ride a horse
-Build a fire [Owyn_Merrilin]
✓Repair your possessions (Oh, the number of times I've repaired my PC)
-Pitch a tent (ARGH THEY'RE ALL DIFFERENT)
-Tie a tie [Wadders])
-Drive a car (automatic and stick)
-Ride a motorcycle
✓Jump start a car
-Change a tire [Wadders]
-Change the oil [Athol]
-Perform first aid, including CPR
✓Clean yourself
✓Clean your possessions (Got a feather duster for Christmas)
✓Shave [Armored Prayer]
-Know what they're talking about (Literature, art, music, history, politics) [Kukulski]
✓Open a can/bottle [Irriduccibilli]
✓Twist off a lid
✓Sharpen a knife [Owyn_Merrilin]
✓Swim [loc978]
-Operate a boat [loc978]
✓Pack a suitcase [Ledan]
✓Pack a car [Ledan]
 

lemiel14n3

happiness is a warm gun
Mar 18, 2010
690
0
0
Cheesus333 said:
I resent the idea that I should be able to do anything based solely on my gender. But hey, I can do most of those things at the age of 16 anyway.
Vivace-Vivian said:
How about not being a chauvinistic ass?

That is all the list you need.
Well,

lemiel14n3 said:
I am saying that men SHOULD, not that women CAN'T, please don't confuse the two.
 

orangeban

New member
Nov 27, 2009
1,442
0
0
I was thinking, what if your allergic to horses? Or have some kind of disablity where you can't read? Seems to me like we need to PC this list.
 

orangeban

New member
Nov 27, 2009
1,442
0
0
lemiel14n3 said:
Cheesus333 said:
I resent the idea that I should be able to do anything based solely on my gender. But hey, I can do most of those things at the age of 16 anyway.
Vivace-Vivian said:
How about not being a chauvinistic ass?

That is all the list you need.
Well,

lemiel14n3 said:
I am saying that men SHOULD, not that women CAN'T, please don't confuse the two.
I think you should note that the third quote does not answer the first quote. In fact, the first quote is complaining about exactly what you said in the third.