If she wants it covered by the tax payer then no she shouldnt get it.
if shes paying then shes free to do as she wishes
if shes paying then shes free to do as she wishes
Me neither, honestly.Catfood220 said:You are a braver man than me, I've been involuntarily celibate for about 7 years and I wouldn't touch her if I was wearing a disaster suit.Queen Michael said:Gotta admit, I find her attractive. And not only because I've been involuntarily celibate for about three years.Sku1c said:A reality starlet.. yay, because we're sorely lacking in idiots on television, right?
I can understand if she'd want the pregnancy terminated earlier, occupational risk I suppose.. but 4 months in, no.
If she truly wants an abortion for some short-lived fame, lock her up, she's not sound of mind then.
![]()
And dear god, what man considers this attractive in any way?
Somebody tell her to quit smoking & drop the tanning bed, she looks ancient compared to her actual age.
The tabloids don't tend to report it so much, but she was actually born with a condition that means that she never developed any breast tissue. She may well have wanted the breast surgery to become a glamour model, but it's not like she didn't have a compelling medical reason to convince the NHS to carry out the procedure.Zipa said:It annoys me more that taxpayers money is apparently paying for something superfluous in a time when the NHS is complaining about lacking money and proposing to close or scale back hospitals in many areas.
While her way of saying it was rather....crass, I'm inclined to not be to angry at her for wanting an abortion, she already has 2 children, not wanting another child is a perfectly acceptable reason to have an abortion. It's not going to be fair on her or the child by refusing to give her an abortion. By UK law, she's still got 6 weeks before she can't have it. Perhaps she changed her mind, or only found out recently?Auron225 said:Call me a sucker then cus I'm more annoyed at the subject matter. I don't think the media had to go to much effort to spin this the way they wanted; if the underlying truth is that she is willing to murder her child for 15 minutes of fame then that is monstrous and it will get a reaction out of me. I pray no doctor will actually do it for her, especially since she's so far into her pregnancy.
Well I suspect if nothing else she would be a pretty stellar shag. Not for me, she looks like a characature of a prostitute in that picture, she actually looks quite sweet in the picture of her in the green dress though. Naked Lipstick creeps me out, I think it makes you look ill. There should be a blood flow in the lips ><Queen Michael said:-snip-
Gotta admit, I find her attractive. And not only because I've been involuntarily celibate for about three years.
Oh well that would've been nice to know. The NHS boob job was the only bit that actually annoyed me about /her/, even then it would be less her fault and more the guy in charge actually saying "Yes we'll give you a boob job". I mean the story is clearly written as a smear piece, but that makes it even more so. I mean the way the story was presented was what annoyed me, as it was clearly just singling someone out for something people do all the time. Like I said above, the way she said it was a bit crass, but people have abortions for career reasons quite normally.Eamar said:The tabloids don't tend to report it so much, but she was actually born with a condition that means that she never developed any breast tissue. She may well have wanted the breast surgery to become a glamour model, but it's not like she didn't have a compelling medical reason to convince the NHS to carry out the procedure.Zipa said:It annoys me more that taxpayers money is apparently paying for something superfluous in a time when the NHS is complaining about lacking money and proposing to close or scale back hospitals in many areas.
Ah fair enough then, if its for a medical reason then that is different and I won't hold it against her.Eamar said:The tabloids don't tend to report it so much, but she was actually born with a condition that means that she never developed any breast tissue. She may well have wanted the breast surgery to become a glamour model, but it's not like she didn't have a compelling medical reason to convince the NHS to carry out the procedure.Zipa said:It annoys me more that taxpayers money is apparently paying for something superfluous in a time when the NHS is complaining about lacking money and proposing to close or scale back hospitals in many areas.
I agree with pretty much everything you said . Wether or not you agree with her decision it is not our responsibility to decide especially since we dont have all the facts and the ones we have are somewhat skewed.elvor0 said:snip
What sort of hellish course makes its students do that?thaluikhain said:I had to watch BB for an entire week in high school. Bleh.shootthebandit said:Off topic: I also like how it says "will you boycott big brother if she appears on it". I boycott big brother every year because its fucking dreadful. The minute I stop boycotting it is when they introduce an angry grizzly bear as a house mate
Damn it, I knew it. I absolutely hate "newspapers" like that.Eamar said:The tabloids don't tend to report it so much, but she was actually born with a condition that means that she never developed any breast tissue. She may well have wanted the breast surgery to become a glamour model, but it's not like she didn't have a compelling medical reason to convince the NHS to carry out the procedure.
Aye, you're most likely right there with the lawyer thing. To expand on your point, what makes that even more interesting, is that a lawyer would presumably be the one in a better position to support children; a lawyer is a respectable, well paid job, she'd likely be praised for her "noble sacrifice" if she did have the child.shootthebandit said:I agree with pretty much everything you said . Wether or not you agree with her decision it is not our responsibility to decide especially since we dont have all the facts and the ones we have are somewhat skewed.elvor0 said:snip
Im pretty sure if a young professional such as a lawyer had an abortion to further her career then the papers would be singing her praise saying how strong and independent she is
Did you notice how the tone of her face dosen't match the rest of her body's skin tone?Sku1c said:A reality starlet.. yay, because we're sorely lacking in idiots on television, right?
I can understand if she'd want the pregnancy terminated earlier, occupational risk I suppose.. but 4 months in, no.
If she truly wants an abortion for some short-lived fame, lock her up, she's not sound of mind then.
![]()
And dear god, what man considers this attractive in any way?
Somebody tell her to quit smoking & drop the tanning bed, she looks ancient compared to her actual age.
English...we were doing The Truman Show, and BB had just started in Australia.Barbas said:What sort of hellish course makes its students do that?thaluikhain said:I had to watch BB for an entire week in high school. Bleh.shootthebandit said:Off topic: I also like how it says "will you boycott big brother if she appears on it". I boycott big brother every year because its fucking dreadful. The minute I stop boycotting it is when they introduce an angry grizzly bear as a house mateI remember an old teacher of mine talking about it years ago in front of the class. I looked up the show to figure out what she was talking about and was horrified that she would even consider it a fit subject for discussion in front of her students.
Why are you reading something that is irrelevant to your life and you don't care about anyway? Just ignore it, that's really the only thing you can do.shootthebandit said:http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/video-josie-cunningham-plans-abortion-3434350
So I seen this article shared on facebook and it really irritated me. Its basically about a girl who got a boob job free on the NHS and now shes pregnant she wants an abortion so she can appear on a dreadful reality tv program
Im not irritated at the subject matter of the article but how it was reported.
a)This girl has nothing to do with me and her life is completely irrelevant to mine. Why should I care about what she wants to do with her unborn child. Thats for medical and legal experts to decide.
b) this is sensationslist journalism designed to get a reaction. How am I supposed to know that this tabloid hasnt edited the interview and taken it out of context
c) if she is getting an abortion just to be famous then why react to this article and give her the publicity she is craving
Im not condoning what she is doing but I just dont care. Its not my decision if she is allowed an abortion or not. I was just pissed off at all the people who are quick to judge and have fallen for this type of "journalism"
/rant
What do you guys think about this sort of sensationslism in media? Why does the media let their readers condemn these people yet at the same time let their readers give her the attention she desires?