Fallen-Angel Risen-Demon said:
i spell however the fuck i want
To a reasonably degree of comprehensibility I suppose. However, picture this, you spell however the fuck you want and suddenly one day
SHOCK nobody could understand what you're saying. That'd be the day when you abandon the basic rules of spelling. However that day has not come and you write carelessly and spell to this afore mentioned degree of comprehensibility. So if anything you actually don't spell how you want, you spell in the same linear pattern most English speakers do!
Fallen-Angel Risen-Demon said:
and i did answer the question
. Ok I want you to note that on this post I am using an iPod touch so there likly will be mistakes. Question 1: over a fortnight that's how long he stayed. Question 2. They were the type of lazy racist bigots that blame all there troubles on a scapegoat in this case immigrents I find this stupid as we all are 'immigrents' as such everyone is decended from them. Also I have family that moved down under are they not imigrents and the answer is yes if you're wondering.
No you didn't.
Fallen-Angel Risen-Demon said:
and i did answer the questionas in my granded read it when he was down here
Don't use language you don't understand. That should not be there. Under any circumstances.
Fallen-Angel Risen-Demon said:
i did answer the question as in my granded read it when he was down here i read it
A comma or two would be handy here...
Okay. Firstly, I didn't need to hear about your grandad, that's what confused me from the get go - You telling me about your grandad when I asked if you had read it.
Secondly, you read it. That's a start! Now I know you have some standing in the argument, however it seems you haven't read many of them. I ask how many days did you read it for?
Fallen-Angel Risen-Demon said:
daily mail are priks thats my opinion
True. Especially Jan Moir. Now, what problems did you find with it?
Fallen-Angel Risen-Demon said:
i'm not asking anyone to agree with me and the fact that your'e arguing with me over MY opinion suggests that you are the type that dosen't except anyones opinion except his and the daily mails
Now this sentence (sentences?) does not make you look illiterate in any shape or form.
Let's break it down!
Fallen-Angel Risen-Demon said:
i'm not asking anyone to agree with me
No. No you are not. This part seems irrelevant.
Fallen-Angel Risen-Demon said:
and the fact that your'e arguing with me over MY opinion
At what point?
LordCuthberton said:
Nice to see you corrected your spelling of "reads" yet missed out on the opportunity to correct "Necessary" - even though I provided the correct spelling...
Just me wondering on prioritys of spelling correction. Nothing on opinions on the Daily mail here!
Now, I did not ask if your grandad reads it. I asked if you read it. I asked if you have ever read it.
This here is me detailing my question further. The use of language here suggests that I had misinterpreted you're earlier muddled statement about your grandfather and I continue to define that I want to know if you had read it. This was a open ended response that would have allowed you to clear up the grandad section and answer the main question. Nothing on opinions on the Daily mail here.
Answer the question.
Nothing on opinions on the Daily mail here!
Fallen-Angel Risen-Demon said:
suggests that you are the type that dosen't except anyones opinion except his and the daily mails
That's a stab in the dark! That's also an insult, hence why I decided to write this lengthy response.
Don't make wild accusations against people. Especially when you have no grounding to your claims.
[sub]It might shock you, I also do not like the Daily Mail! However, I do buy it daily, along with The Guardian, so I can read Left and Right views every day. This was also why I persisted in asking if you have even read the paper, as many critics, Teenagers especially, parrot what they have heard from popular television or satirists. [/sub]
Fallen-Angel Risen-Demon said:
and i did'nt spell reads wrong I HAD A TYPO!
That you may have. Though you have yet again missed the point of what I was saying.
I was curious as to prioritys of spelling correction. I'm a little depressing and boring like that. Anyway, the fact you had chosen to correct 1 out of 2 errors made me wonder. This abnormality was added to by the fact the other word had been spelled right in the post you were responding. It made me wonder, is this intentional? Is it a cry of rebellion? Is this a little snarky? Or was this just unseen?
I will admit I was a little tactless and blunt, and if we stretched it, insulting even. I do apologize for that, but remember I was merely exploring the idioms of a persons personal English writing style.
Fallen-Angel Risen-Demon said:
I hate people who insult others over spelling
As I said, I didn't want to come across this way. But I did. So guilty as charged!
Fallen-Angel Risen-Demon said:
its so last resort and childish
I disagree here on a number of factors. Firstly, I did not question your spelling as a 'last resort'. It was merely the object of obsession at that moment of time. Also, it was not exactly childish - as a high grade English Language student these things are amazing to analyse, for personal enjoyment and studies. A childish response would be "your mum". That would also double up as a last resort as there is no side to attack in a argument - It is as blunt as a full stop.
Fallen-Angel Risen-Demon said:
'cus you dont admit your wrong.
I've never really looked at it this way. You've opened my eyes. I will explore this further.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Feel free to respond to any of my statements, I'll be here all night.
Now to sum up what I would like a response to.
How many days did you read the Daily Mail for?
What problems did you find with it?
