That.. Is the best theory I've ever heard.HyenaThePirate said:No, that's silly.Comando96 said:To be fair if any of the PSN V XLive is to occur then both need to be hacked by the same group before we can truly see which stands up better.HyenaThePirate said:I wonder if anybody is now rethinking that whole "PSN > Xbox Live cause it's Freeeee!" thing.
Right about now I'm betting that $5 monthly fee doesn't seem all that ridiculous...
The argument you make so far is that because Solder A was killed because he had people firing at him while Soldier B is alive and he didn't have people firing at him... therefore B is superior. Na. Both must be put in the same situation.
What I'm saying is Army A is dealt a terrible blow by the enemy and is unable to protect its property because it lost a soldier and didn't have the funding or infrastructure set aside to endure such a loss. Army B loses a soldier but since they are well funded by the people they are paid to provide protection from, they are and have been able to keep their troops in armor, weapons, and to hire new soldiers immediately to restore order or prevent order from being lost to begin with.