I am so tired of this bullshit. I wanted to enjoy some Netflix while eating my lunch, or finally see online mode on MK9. But NOOO. Fucking hackers need to go jump off a cliff.
Exactly the words i was thinkingace_of_something said:Saying 'it was anonymous' is like saying 'the shooting was done by some sort of gang member'
There is no substantiated evidence that the hacker is selling the information.AdumbroDeus said:Odds are they're either lying or the hacker is attempting to cover their tracks. Let's assume they didn't plant it themselves, then the hacker is obviously not aligned with anon's goals. It's very obviously a for profit hack because the hacker is selling the credit card numbers, anon would have no interest in that.
Frankly the entire type of hack is something that doesn't fit anon's goals, it's not targeting PSN, it's targeting PSN's users.
It's not Anon's modus operendi, and after sony taking so long to admit the problem as well as their previous issues (like it's cds installing a rootkit) my first instinct is that sony is trying to do this to get some sympathy from the courts with the inevitable millions of lawsuits it will face.
This! Thank you. This whole No-True-Scotsman argument Anonymous uses is a cop out - either they police their own and organize, or they're legitimately 'everyone' and whatever crimes are done in their name reflect on them. If they keep insisting they are everyone, they'll soon find that that includes a lot of unsavory people.Generic Gamer said:(fuckin' zero punctuation slowing the site down and eating my posts...)
Yep, this was Anonymous.
See, Anon can't have this both ways. They're very quick to do that whole 'that granny walking her dog? Anonymous. We are everyone' thing but the second something bad gets blamed on them it's all 'no true Anon would do this'.
Well tough. EITHER Anon is anyone who calls themselves that OR Anon is a specific group of people.
Wait, you mean we should... read the articles? I thought we should just get on Sony's case for stuff.Jonsbax said:Umm, what the crap, people? They simply stated what the file they found said, and then called whoever did this cyberterrorists. I missed the part where they blamed Anonymous for anything, so the headline on Kotaku was just plain bad sensational writing, and so is the name of this topic.
Nice work making another debate about Anonymous and PSN here, though. Been missing those.
Not only this, but the kind of hacking that had to be done to get into the PSN is very different -- and much more difficult -- than the kind of "hacking" that anonymous tends to do. Real hackers refer to them as "script kiddies," because what they do isn't really hacking at all. It's mostly DDOS attacks, which couldn't possibly have this result.AdumbroDeus said:Odds are they're either lying or the hacker is attempting to cover their tracks. Let's assume they didn't plant it themselves, then the hacker is obviously not aligned with anon's goals. It's very obviously a for profit hack because the hacker is selling the credit card numbers, anon would have no interest in that.
Frankly the entire type of hack is something that doesn't fit anon's goals, it's not targeting PSN, it's targeting PSN's users.
It's not Anon's modus operendi, and after sony taking so long to admit the problem as well as their previous issues (like it's cds installing a rootkit) my first instinct is that sony is trying to do this to get some sympathy from the courts with the inevitable millions of lawsuits it will face.