Sony finds "proof" Anon was involved in PSN hack

Recommended Videos

BoogieManFL

New member
Apr 14, 2008
1,284
0
0
I am so tired of this bullshit. I wanted to enjoy some Netflix while eating my lunch, or finally see online mode on MK9. But NOOO. Fucking hackers need to go jump off a cliff.
 

conflictofinterests

New member
Apr 6, 2010
1,098
0
0
You know the interesting thing about Anonymous is that they are Anonymous. Literally ANYONE could truthfully call themselves that so long as they never also reveal their true identities.
 

distended

New member
Oct 15, 2010
91
0
0
OH GOD ANONYMOUS DID IT... WE NOW HAVE TO REDIRECT OUR SEARCH FROM A FACELESS GROUP OF PEOPLE TO A FACELESS GROUP OF PEOPLE
 

lord canti

New member
May 30, 2009
619
0
0
You seem to have forgotten the part when sony said it could very well be a decoy trying to frame them.
 

icame

New member
Aug 4, 2010
2,649
0
0
Well if this is true then it doesn't change my opinion of them. They always were dicks and still are.
 

dibblywibbles

New member
Mar 20, 2009
313
0
0
that seems kinda shady on sony's part. they won't go before congress but here's a note we found. I guess lying is ok if it isn't done in person. they haven't handled this well and it just seems mighty convenient to try and pass the buck to someone else. if only BP had an anonymous to blame for their screw up in the gulf...
 

Nuuu

Senior Member
Jan 28, 2011
530
0
21
"*Clap, Clap, Clap* Oh good, the slow clap generator seems to have made it" - GlaDos
It might not be HARD evidence, but it is a pretty good lead in my opinion.
 

JDKJ

New member
Oct 23, 2010
2,065
0
0
AdumbroDeus said:
Odds are they're either lying or the hacker is attempting to cover their tracks. Let's assume they didn't plant it themselves, then the hacker is obviously not aligned with anon's goals. It's very obviously a for profit hack because the hacker is selling the credit card numbers, anon would have no interest in that.

Frankly the entire type of hack is something that doesn't fit anon's goals, it's not targeting PSN, it's targeting PSN's users.


It's not Anon's modus operendi, and after sony taking so long to admit the problem as well as their previous issues (like it's cds installing a rootkit) my first instinct is that sony is trying to do this to get some sympathy from the courts with the inevitable millions of lawsuits it will face.
There is no substantiated evidence that the hacker is selling the information.
 

Randomologist

Senior Member
Aug 6, 2008
581
0
21
Ooh funny that, I just got a random bill from a company that makes Guy Fawkes masks for ten thousand quid, so it must be Anon. Sherlock Holmes hasn't got shit on you, Sony. Your legal argument is as unassailable as your moral superiority in not telling us about this for a week.
 

Hyper-space

New member
Nov 25, 2008
1,361
0
0
This is the same as with the Stuxnet virus, the hacker plants files and faux-traces to mislead investigations. Its just spy-shit 101 (if that exists).

This doesn't fit Anonymous' style, which is just mass-scale DDoS attacks (seeing as they are not a quantifiable group), not a professional stunt like this.
 

Awexsome

Were it so easy
Mar 25, 2009
1,549
0
0
I wouldn't put the blame on Anonymous immedietly from that one file... oh wait. Nobody did.

Sony was just reporting their findings that the whole investigation had found and giving the timeline of how the events from the intrusion went. I see nothing interesting here that we didn't already know.
 
Mar 29, 2008
361
0
0
As far as Anonymous' involvement or the nature of their organization, its conspiratorial enough where the only solution is to assume something along the lines of: Sony created anon years ago to establish a full blown organization and MO just so that they could use them to hack themselves, years later to embezzle/launder all sorts of cash that if done convincingly enough disprove's anon's involvement due to it being possibly not their style WHILE taking off suspicion of Sony. But now some of Anon is independent, some is still true to Sony, while another faction entirely has been working for Apple all along, not to mention that Sony is a shadow subsidiary of Microsoft and Microsoft was created by the first anon member, Wozniak, who built Bill Gates in his basement in order to exploit and point out the flaws of capitalism.
 

krytorii

New member
Jun 11, 2008
10
0
0
The problem is that invoking the name/label "Anonymous" (usually with a capital A) is that it's so ambiguous. You could be talking about a single person who isn't revealing their name, an organised anonymous group, or 4chan users.

Now, I think we can rule out 4chan users as a group in whole for this rather easily. The most subtle thing they could do as a collective group would be to order a load of pizza's to Sony's offices.

And the other 2, well nobody who's done this is gonna admit to who they are (as in, real name/identity). And anybody can pull out the whole "we are legion" phrase. Who wants to bet that some news outlet somewhere links this Anonymous the general 4chan group?
 

mechanixis

New member
Oct 16, 2009
1,136
0
0
Generic Gamer said:
(fuckin' zero punctuation slowing the site down and eating my posts...)

Yep, this was Anonymous.

See, Anon can't have this both ways. They're very quick to do that whole 'that granny walking her dog? Anonymous. We are everyone' thing but the second something bad gets blamed on them it's all 'no true Anon would do this'.

Well tough. EITHER Anon is anyone who calls themselves that OR Anon is a specific group of people.
This! Thank you. This whole No-True-Scotsman argument Anonymous uses is a cop out - either they police their own and organize, or they're legitimately 'everyone' and whatever crimes are done in their name reflect on them. If they keep insisting they are everyone, they'll soon find that that includes a lot of unsavory people.
 

Regiment

New member
Nov 9, 2009
610
0
0
Jonsbax said:
Umm, what the crap, people? They simply stated what the file they found said, and then called whoever did this cyberterrorists. I missed the part where they blamed Anonymous for anything, so the headline on Kotaku was just plain bad sensational writing, and so is the name of this topic.

Nice work making another debate about Anonymous and PSN here, though. Been missing those.
Wait, you mean we should... read the articles? I thought we should just get on Sony's case for stuff.

Does it really matter what organization does or doesn't claim responsibility? A person (or people) did this, and that person will be caught and punished. Idle speculation about what vague formless mishegas did what to whom doesn't do a lot.
 

Owyn_Merrilin

New member
May 22, 2010
7,370
0
0
AdumbroDeus said:
Odds are they're either lying or the hacker is attempting to cover their tracks. Let's assume they didn't plant it themselves, then the hacker is obviously not aligned with anon's goals. It's very obviously a for profit hack because the hacker is selling the credit card numbers, anon would have no interest in that.

Frankly the entire type of hack is something that doesn't fit anon's goals, it's not targeting PSN, it's targeting PSN's users.


It's not Anon's modus operendi, and after sony taking so long to admit the problem as well as their previous issues (like it's cds installing a rootkit) my first instinct is that sony is trying to do this to get some sympathy from the courts with the inevitable millions of lawsuits it will face.
Not only this, but the kind of hacking that had to be done to get into the PSN is very different -- and much more difficult -- than the kind of "hacking" that anonymous tends to do. Real hackers refer to them as "script kiddies," because what they do isn't really hacking at all. It's mostly DDOS attacks, which couldn't possibly have this result.