I'm glad someone else sees this. Sony has done horrible things in the past but right now due to M$ utter dickshittery people are hailing Sony as some kind of saviors.loa said:Sony has a history of retroactively removing features used as selling points from their consoles so their words are cheap.
It is advisable not to trust a single thing they say.
We'll see what they will actually do.
I see no reason the PS4 games can't be atleast the same as XBone if not cheaper, the reason PS4 was so much more was the cell processor, the issue isn't there for the PS4 since it uses the same AMD x86 processor that PC's and XBone use.wulfy42 said:*SNIP*
I strongly suggest they initially sell games at $60 as well, even if they do have to boost the price on them later (and possible even on some at launch). Having most games sell for $60 would be good enough for now. If they really wanted to THRASH xbox though, they could offer a lower price for digital versions of games (downloaded through the network and not purchased with a disc/manual etc). Pass the savings directly on to the customer there...and yet again they would be putting another nail into the Xbox Coffin.
*SNIP*
I thought that, too. The big contention has been around games and services, rather than DA NUMBAZ. Nice to see that.Devoneaux said:Just taking a moment to point out that the hardware for the first time in a long while is the least of everyone's concerns...Isn't that nice?
The hardware is more than comparable... it's practically identical.Devoneaux said:Just taking a moment to point out that the hardware for the first time in a long while is the least of everyone's concerns...Isn't that nice?
What alternate dimension did you come from? The 360 was/is struggling for second place, nowhere near first. And it's pretty unanimous that MS got slaughtered at E3.theApoc said:...MS won E3 and will win this generation just like the last...
theApoc said:Congrats Sony, a small group of nerds who don't actually matter think you "won" E3. In reality, your mistake is lending credence to the idea that you are any different than MS as these sheep will just as quickly become wolves upon your first broken promise. MS won E3 and will win this generation just like the last for one simple reason, they aren't marketing to YOU. They don't care about your nerd rage, they don't care who thing the PS4 is "ZOMG Awesome" and they certainly don't care about a dog and pony show that no one will remember 3 weeks from now.
XBOX Live and the multimedia experience created by MS has no equal in current technology. Sony is focusing on "games" because they know they suck at everything else. They know where the real money is to be made and understand that their piece of that pie is always going to be smaller than MS. The best thing about MS strategy is that it completely neuters the fanboy mentality.
They still have games, they still have exclusives and they still have the lions share of paid service subscriptions. They also have a multimedia device that has no equal at this time.
heh, I am amazed at how much people think stuff like this matters.
Why would you say MS WON last Generation. By all reasoning Nintendo Dominated the previous console generation. MS and Sony were just fighting for second place in terms of sales.theApoc said:Snip
Correct me if I'm wrong here, but doesn't it become quite different if we measure game sales in addition to console sales? I used to work at GameStop and all of our numbers showed that the attach rate for Wii was VASTLY lower than for Xbox360 or PS3. Sony and Microsoft gets licensing money for every game sold, right? That would change the rankings by quite a bit, I think.Winnosh said:Why would you say MS WON last Generation. By all reasoning Nintendo Dominated the previous console generation. MS and Sony were just fighting for second place in terms of sales.theApoc said:Snip