Ah ha, except you know WHY Sony got rid of those other features? If you gues cluckeh the chicken, then I'd giggle. If your second guess was GeoHot then I owe you a bazaar full of health potions. He was using thos features to break into the PS3 in the first place, Sony got nervous and didn't want this kind of thing to happen so they removed it. Then this whole back and forth debacle happened and now hackers are after Sony for what GeoHot provoked them to do. Yet no one is mad at GeoNeo. And some people wondered why I wanted him sued to the moon.HankMan said:This is EXACTLY what I'm on about: It's not about intentions it's about the natural progression of things. Geohotz wouldn't have tried to jailbreak the PS3 if Sony hadn't locked away all those features to begin with. There's no conspiracy at all (at least not in THIS case)Jumplion said:(this is really weird to read all this with Beiber staring at me on everyone's avatar....)HankMan said:This is true, but I don't think the ones who hacked Sony were doing it "for the people" any more than I think people like Geohots jail-broke the PS3 to steal personal information from PSN accounts. It's not a direct 'cause and effect' or 'action-reaction' thing I'm getting at. It's more like 'Six degrees of Keven Bacon'.
GeoHotz is a complicated case. On the one hand, I don't think there was any problem with him hacking his hardware, but then he distributed the security root key software to bypass everything. Whether he had good intentions or not is kind of overshadowed by the damage he did to his cause by releasing private, secured information that, in all likelyhood, GeoHotz had no right to distribute.
If that is the case with these hackers, then they've got a helluvah conspiracy.
.>
And I also know what your talking about with the Bieber thing. Try re-orientating yourself by looking at your friend avatar list, it doesn't effect that.