Sony Teases Possible PlayStation 4 Announcement

Recommended Videos

OniaPL

New member
Nov 9, 2010
1,057
0
0
Fireprufe15 said:
You won't be getting Left for dead on consoles anytime soon. Valve hates closed systems, that's why they stick to PC.
But both Left 4 Deads have been released on Xbox 360? Or am I missing something here?
 

Snownine

New member
Apr 19, 2010
577
0
0
Soviet Steve said:
Still waiting for a good reason to get the PS3 or Xbox 360. I'm guessing they're never going to get around to that.
Yeah, this generation kinda passed me by as well.
 

DarkArk

New member
May 3, 2011
76
0
0
Foolproof said:
DarkArk said:
Simalacrum said:
Graphics doesn't necessarily mean innovation.
I'm rather sick of people continuing to spit this out like it's some kind of truth. It's not. Giving developers more processing power means that they can do more.

Indie games truly flourished in this generation, and they certainly didn't need powerful consoles to achieve that they did
How many indie open world games are there?
Whats Journey, if not the truest expression of the open world?
You mean the game that took three years to make, nearly ran out of money, and had a dev team of 18 people? You're just making my point for me.
 

DarkArk

New member
May 3, 2011
76
0
0
Foolproof said:
Because if it isn't easy, fuck it, just give up. Thats the independent way.
I love your straw. My point was that open world games are hard to make, because they require a lot of effort. Journey fits the bill on that, taking a long time to develop, having a much larger team than most indie games, and the devs nearly went bankrupt making it and so had to cut back their ideas considerably to finish it.

What in that is wrong?
 

Legion

Were it so easy
Oct 2, 2008
7,190
0
0
What was that about the PS3 having a good ten years?

On a more serious note, this better have backwards compatibility and the ability to bring forward PSN downloads from PS3 accounts for me to be even remotely interested. If it does I will happily trade in my PS3 and pay the difference, otherwise they can forget it.
 

BrotherRool

New member
Oct 31, 2008
3,834
0
0
Has anyone heard if there's any ARG stuff going on this trailer? It'd be very like Sony to do that
Legion said:
What was that about the PS3 having a good ten years?

On a more serious note, this better have backwards compatibility and the ability to bring forward PSN downloads from PS3 accounts for me to be even remotely interested. If it does I will happily trade in my PS3 and pay the difference, otherwise they can forget it.
SonOfVoorhees said:
PS3 was only released in November 2006, or so wikipedia says. So if the PS4 is released November 2013 then the PS3 will only be 7 years old, so much for the 10 year plan. I dont know what other gamers think by the PS3 has a lot of life in it, as does the 360...atleast another few years. An like with all the PS consoles, the amazing titles start coming out later in its life once the developers work out how to use it proper.....as all PS consoles were never user friendly for game developers.

Hopefully, fingers crossed, they will create a big WOW factor, especially this early in the year. If there is no WOW, then im not sure if the PS4 will succeed. I kinda with they wait till E3 and just go nuts with new tech, new games and really sell/hype that crap out of it. Somehow, i get the feeling on 20th Feb will be a vid showing the PS4 logo and "The future of gaming is here this fall" and that will be it. Hope not.
I think the 10 year plan includes a period of several years after the next console comes out where they still produce the last. That was how they were counting the PS2 when they said it had a similar life cycle. Games will drop off quickly, but there'll probably be quite a few projects that didn't finish in time or who decided to go with the larger install base instead of a new console.

I'm pretty sure the PS2 ended up smashing even their 10 year idea, it only got discontinued this year.

All in all there were a lot lessons Sony needed to learn and I hope they learned them, like you said they need to be much better at making it easy to develop. I don't want to go through another 2+ years waiting for developers PS skill to catch up to their xbox skill. It needs to be cheaper, it doesn't need to be as powerful.

Instead I'm hoping they're looking at features instead of power. Backwards compatibility and free online access is pretty much all they'd need to convince me.
 

Deathlyphil

New member
Mar 6, 2008
222
0
0
If the PS4 is using an AMD chip then it will not be backwards-compatible with the PS3. The chip architecture is just too different. Remember all the devs complaining that the PS3 was far too hard to code for when it first launched? They'd essentially have to rewrite all their code to make games work again. I doubt we will see a PS3 emulator either, as it would take a huge amount of processing power to replicate the Cell chip.
 

gorfias

Unrealistic but happy
Legacy
May 13, 2009
7,453
2,022
118
Country
USA
It's about time for a number of reasons.
1) I'm happy with the games I have. You want to get me excited about a new game coming out? It needs to be on new hardware sporting superior graphics.
2) They need to stay relevant and in the game. There are SOooooo many new comers. Just saw this:


Things like this make me not fear a loss of used games. Steam is so dang cheap (and a Steam Box is coming). If I can stream to my 55" LED? And Android is going nuts. Cheap and plentiful.

I cannot wait to see what Sony provides to compete. Like the guy screams from the audiece in this video, "Just take my damn money already!"
 

The White Hunter

Basment Abomination
Oct 19, 2011
3,888
0
0
Raiyan 1.0 said:
You know, with every new generation of consoles, we see HD rereleases of previous generation classics.

I wonder what games from this generation will be worthy enough for gamers to rebuy them all over again on the new system...
Well int erms of playstation, maybe the Resistance trilogy. But otherwise there are some great games, but nothing screamed classic to me this gen on the PS3 as an exclusive.

RDR, Resistance 1 and 3, BioShock, maybe the Darkness games..
 

Assassin Xaero

New member
Jul 23, 2008
5,392
0
0
Cid SilverWing said:
The next PlayStation needs to be delayed at the very least another 5 years. It's not been long enough since the PS3 was released. Pace yourself already, Sony.
Uhh... go talk to Apple about pacing themselves, not Sony.

OT: I'll eventually get one, but I'll most likely wait for a price drop and it to get some good games (unless they make it backwards compatible with the PS3 - or better yet, the PS1-3).
 

Nieroshai

New member
Aug 20, 2009
2,940
0
0
Eri said:
Cid SilverWing said:
The next PlayStation needs to be delayed at the very least another 5 years. It's not been long enough since the PS3 was released. Pace yourself already, Sony.
Is this sarcasm? Because if it isn't, it's been 7 years.
And it's a console that hasn't even been stretched to the limit. He has a point.
 

Nieroshai

New member
Aug 20, 2009
2,940
0
0
dontlooknow said:
Well, I reckon that the next Playstation is going to be blue, have four buttons that are marked with an ex, a square, a triangle, and a circle, and will probably use some kind of electricity.
I'd lay money down on the "blue" if I thought you were serious. I'll bet you an e-cookie that it's going to resemble this again