Agayek said:
I shall point to you the several centuries of human colonization, butchery and enslavement of foreign peoples. The principle is exactly the same. Why would you go across the ocean, murder everyone there that didn't give you what you wanted, then enslave the rest and come back home?
There is a logical flaw in this argument, in that aliens are just that, and we cannot therefore properly apply human reasoning to their behavior. Without any other metric though, being hostile and violent to outsiders is a perfectly acceptable conclusion to reach regarding extraterrestrials.
Also, resources that are right here are infinitely more valuable than resources on the other side of the universe. That's plenty of reason for an alien fleet in the Solar system to murder all of humanity.
Space is not like Earth. Oceans and seas are much easier to traverse than interstellar gulfs, the amount of resources you can harvest from your own solar system is massive.
Consider for a moment that at the root of all conflict is a struggle over resources. Religions and nations may squabble over seemingly arcane things but what are they really fighting over? Land to grow on followers to depend on. If you have all the resources you could want there is no incentive to fight. If a species is advanced enough to traverse the universe, not continents or oceans, then they are advanced enough to harvest resources from wherever they please.
Why would they choose to harvest from a populated system? Why would they choose to harvest from the tiny planet that supports life when there are gas giants and moons with much more accessible resources in the same solar system?
I am not proposing anything more than common sense would presuppose about a species that has learned to survive. If you want to make the assertion that they would for some reason be more violent than we would rightly expect then I would expect you to back up your theory.
Internet Kraken said:
Notice how your acting superior about something you don't understand. Nobody knows what alien life would be like. We can make, at best, educated guesses about how species would have evolved on other planets. We have no clue about what an intelligent, space-faring species would be like since we have not even reached that level yet. Think about how many different environments there are on earth and how much diversity we see here. Think about what a species could be like if genetic modifications were incredibly common and they had altered themselves to the point where they did not even resemble there original form. Then you need to take into consideration what impact their technology may have had on society.
When you make all of this into consideration, I find you saying something like this;
Heathrow said:
I find terrifying aliens to be implausible and therefore not compelling. I prefer to think about what aliens might actually be like.
to be laughably absurd.
There are clues, I have laid some of them out. You may ignore them if you wish.
As to my superiority, I felt it necessary to rebuke an insult in kind. And if anyone ever called for a perfect example of shallow-mindedness then I would propose as a candidate the man who belittles the imaginative and creative effort to hypothesize on what life beyond our experience is actually like.
Nieroshai said:
You say that like intelligence and technological advancement go hand in hand. We still kill, hate, and envy just like we did when all we had was pelts and sharpened sticks. Besides, we got off-topic. The necromorphs and the Aliens xenomorphs use living organisms as part of their reproductive cycles, and are hive-minded parasites. They aren't space-faring in the slightest. In fact, the necromorphic plague in Dead Space originated from a code on a monolith on Earth, so they aren't aliens at all, just transforming zombies.
Do we travel as we wish among the stars? Do we bend the cosmos to our will? Do we explore the universe in our ships or only in our imaginations? Humanity has a long way to go, and I never said we were anything like a space fairing civilization.
As to necromorphs, if they are alien then in reality they should find our biology quite inhospitable for parasitism. If they are Terran then they don't really enter into this discussion do they?
The Random One said:
I wish you were right and scientific progress was intrinsically connected to societal progress, but that's not the case. The nazis built the first rockets. And yes they wouldn't have gotten far because of their stupid idea of aryan sciences being better, but a world in which the dominating society is self-centered self-entitlement every scientific idea is eventually going to come to the mind of a guy of the proper race.
Plus the aliens might:
- Have some sort of ritualistic significance to attacking and destroying other races/inhabited planets.
- Be an extreme fringe group of a society that reached high tech levels through peaceful means.
- Simply fail to realize humans are sophont/sentient/alive and accidentally kill them.
- Categorize humans as animals due to insanely high thresholds to be considered intelligent life in their culture, i.e. you must be able to build a Dyson sphere.
- Have no concept of death as a negative act in their culture, and kill humans as a way to inform us we are in their way.
- Destroying our world to make way for a transgalactic highway.
Etc, etc.
Unless you believe the military success of the fatherland would have brought about the end of all conflict then my point stands. Fascist regimes will propagate conflict and therefore prevent any ability to attain the planetary unity that will be necessary for proper space exploration to begin.
The initial cost of any serious intergalactic exploration will almost always be beyond the reach of any single power bloc on a resource barren planet and if resources are plentiful then why would a species be warlike?
As to you other points. I do not find that ritualistic and traditionalist behaviors correspond with any sort of scientific progress. Science is often about breaking free from old ways of thinking and these systems do not work well together.
Fringe groups all have the same problems as fascists. That was simply my catch-all for that group of aliens.
Not realizing we are life is highly probable and a good reason to invest time on speculating on the true nature of alien species so we don't make that mistake ourselves.
Classifying humans as animals wouldn't make them genocidal towards us would it? Unless I missed something.
I think it would be hard for any living creature to not have a negative concept of death. If we encountered a hive consciousness this could be a problem though. Killing a few million drones might be its idea of a gentle rebuke. Still I think most space fairing races will have an evolved sense of diplomacy and tact, my personal opinion though.
Finally: Space is big. You just won't believe how vastly, hugely, mind- bogglingly big it is. I mean, you may think it's a long way down the road to the chemist's, but that's just peanuts to space. The odds of their trans galactic bypass bisecting our insignificant little point of space strike me as infinitely improbable.