Squirrel reviews the typical MP3 consumer

Recommended Videos

squirrelman42

New member
Dec 13, 2007
263
0
0
I don't remember, but I may have written something like this before, if I have I apologize and feel free to mail me a kick in the junk

There are many types of consumers in the world. There are intelligent consumers who research their product and find out which of the available models have the features they want at the price they want to pay. Even if you have the money to throw away on a designer brand, you want to make sure that what you are getting at least seems worth it.

Then there are impulse buyers. They go window shopping, or just happen to walk by a store and then there it is: the object that will solve all of their problems, at least for the next 20 minutes.

Then there are the fat lazy sacks of crap who sit at home all the time and buy girls gone wild and diet pills that they see ads for on Comedy Central.

Finally there are the MP3 shoppers. These people have to be the most ignorant and willful people ever to have landed on this planet from wherever they came from. Most of them don't even know what an MP3 player is, because the object that they are shopping for is a specific brand of MP3 player called the iPod. The iPod is not the worst MP3 player on the market, but from a pure money to features look, the iPod is the worst value on the market. However, upon showing the better products with a lesser cost, the MP3 consumer will invariably turn aside other models because "the iPod is easier to use" or "it has to be an iPod because she'll freak out if I get her anything else". These statements are erroneous and the people that come into my store and neglect to listen to my advice need to burn and die in hell for making me obsolete.

In conclusion, as far as customers and consumers go, the MP3 consumer is one of the worst. He is dwarfed only to the tantrum child owning mother, the "drool on your merchandise but not buy anything because I no speaka de english" foreigner and the "I want to haggle because I'm too cheap to pay retail price and if you don't haggle I will chew your face off" granny.
 

Jumplion

New member
Mar 10, 2008
7,873
0
0
I just bought an iPod because of...well...basically everything that you said.

It's obviously the most well known iPod, and iTunes is pretty easy to use, but there are some other good MP3 players out there.
 

L.B. Jeffries

New member
Nov 29, 2007
2,175
0
0
What other alternative is there that doesn't involve the RIAA coming for me, my children, my children's children, and the little dog too?
 

Larenxis

New member
Dec 13, 2007
1,648
0
0
Couldn't agree more. I got an iPod as a present, and then some iPod gear, so I can't switch to another type because then my accessories will go obsolete. All of my friends with iPods have had them crap out on them (I've gone through two) and I have a very low opinion of the product.
 

TomNook

New member
Feb 21, 2008
821
0
0
Well god forbid I go for the retard easy version(I'm an iPod owner if you couldn't guess).
 

Drong

New member
Oct 31, 2007
269
0
0
Buy creative for the love of anything thats holy, I have a old 3gig creative zen which has done me for years and last year brought a 1gig creative zen stone for use in the gym, they are reliable, looks much better and smaller than the ipod mini, weigh next to nothing, has a seriously long battery life, no drm, uses a standard mini usb connection and you can plug it straight into any pc, no additional software required and copy songs straight to and from it.

Oh and it's cheaper, why the hell these are not outselling the ipods 10-1 is completly beyond me.
 

Nettacki

New member
Feb 25, 2008
66
0
0
Drong said:
Buy creative for the love of anything thats holy, I have a old 3gig creative zen which has done me for years and last year brought a 1gig creative zen stone for use in the gym, they are reliable, looks much better and smaller than the ipod mini, weigh next to nothing, has a seriously long battery life, no drm, uses a standard mini usb connection and you can plug it straight into any pc, no additional software required and copy songs straight to and from it.

Oh and it's cheaper, why the hell these are not outselling the ipods 10-1 is completly beyond me.
It's a little thing called "marketing" and "consumer perception" that forces the Zen into the "good cheap iPod alternative" category and not the "uber-awesome iPod killer" one, despite all the good things going for it. And this is to be expected, considering (as far as I know, correct me if I'm wrong) Apple has far better marketing campaigns than Creative.
 

K.os Theory

New member
Nov 28, 2007
16
0
0
buy one of these instead...absolutely amazing bit of kit ( if you like dance music )...

http://www.pacemaker.net/device/
 

00exmachina

New member
Feb 21, 2008
79
0
0
squirrelman42 said:
Finally there are the MP3 shoppers. These people have to be the most ignorant and willful people ever to have landed on this planet from wherever they came from. Most of them don't even know what an MP3 player is, because the object that they are shopping for is a specific brand of MP3 player called the iPod. The iPod is not the worst MP3 player on the market, but from a pure money to features look, the iPod is the worst value on the market. However, upon showing the better products with a lesser cost, the MP3 consumer will invariably turn aside other models because "the iPod is easier to use" or "it has to be an iPod because she'll freak out if I get her anything else". These statements are erroneous and the people that come into my store and neglect to listen to my advice need to burn and die in hell for making me obsolete.
Sorry for the trim, but I removed the 'Hi I'm angry, and Bye I'm still angry bits'
I know you used most to cover not making too broad of a statement but I have to call you into account for some of the picking an ipod = uninfomred consumer.

I can't speak for others but the reasons I chose the iPod were:
-Ease of repair and replacement.
It's a sealed system with off the shelf parts and very easy to repair or replace
components
-It's an apple product
The rabid fan base insures a very long support life for the product.
-It's built form off the shelf gear
So it's upgrade-able. 20 gb Ipod + swiss army knife + 40 GB toshiba HD = 40gb Ipod.

I consider it a very cash friendly feature to pay a little more and get a player that is fairly durable, that I can fix myself, and judging by the number of instructional websites on the topic I'm not the only one.
 

Sib

New member
Dec 22, 2007
561
0
0
I like my iPod but i detest iTunes with the white hot intensity of a thousand burning suns.
 

RufusMcLaser

New member
Mar 27, 2008
714
0
0
Nettacki nailed it... It's all about marketing.
It's pretty clear to me that the Ipod is an example of a marginal product succeeding in the marketplace less on its merits and more on a damn good marketing campaign. (All the cool kids have one!) Naturally, Apple isn't the only company- by far- to do such, but it's surprising how much fawning they generate.
 

Fire Daemon

Quoth the Daemon
Dec 18, 2007
3,204
0
0
Move over console wars!

I had a Creative (brand) MP3 player before it snapped in half. Now I have an LG (life's good) MP3 player. In my opinion if it plays music then it is a good music player, the brand is meaningless.
 

iamnotincompliance

New member
Apr 23, 2008
309
0
0
Ahh, Creative, my arch nemesis. So far as I know, you, Drong, are the only human being on the planet who has any luck getting a Zen to function for any measurable amount of time. In fact, a while back, Creative lost, oh, thousands of repeat customers in a fiasco that blew quickly out of proportion, and yet all complaints were legitimate (I chimed in with a few myself). Lack of driver support for anything that isn't the latest hardware (even then, not a guarantee), buggy hardware, useless tech support... this isn't a Creative bashing thread, is it?

No, sadly, it isn't, so I will follow the line the thread started... before bashing Creative some more. I am, I guess, a hybrid intelligent/impulsive shopper. Usually I research, sometimes I find something I wasn't looking for while in my perusings of stores I happen to be at for whatever reason. Naturally, I have an iPod, a 2 gig Nano which some trespasser dropped in the back yard, so it's mine now *****! Sure, it's not flashy, but it gets the job done. The iPod digital interface I installed in the Explorer, on the other hand, is a finicky little bastard, but I can't blame Apple (or Creative) for that. I'd probably buy another, bigger model if this one bites the dust (even if I hadn't bought the accessories, like a digital interface for a Ford) because I figure Apple wouldn't have sold as many as they have if they weren't doing something right.

Don't forget the customers looking for an mp3 player who assume they're all called iPods.

Now, what else is wrong with Creative...?
 

squirrelman42

New member
Dec 13, 2007
263
0
0
Jumplion said:
I just bought an iPod because of...well...basically everything that you said.

It's obviously the most well known iPod, and iTunes is pretty easy to use, but there are some other good MP3 players out there.
That's exactly my point. If it's not made by apple it's not an iPod. They are all MP3 Players.
 

Anarchemitis

New member
Dec 23, 2007
9,102
0
0
I don't have any portable devices of any kind, save for an MMD memory card.
And I don't get mp3s. The compression on those containers is horrible. .WAVs are where it's at.
Speaking of which, does anyone here actually put effort into compressing their media for space? Whenever I get a video file in wmv, I convert it to xvid-mpeg 4 and whenever possible, my pictures are png.
 

iamnotincompliance

New member
Apr 23, 2008
309
0
0
Anarchemitis said:
And I don't get mp3s. The compression on those containers is horrible. .WAVs are where it's at.
Speaking of which, does anyone here actually put effort into compressing their media for space?
Now, now, if you make your own mp3s, and not buy from crappy sources or steal them, they come off quite well. I, while filling said two gig Nano, pulled a double conversion from CD to lossless .wav to near lossless mp3 (as a direct conversion would have been far too simple [/sarcastic tone]), and I honestly can't tell the difference. I'm a bit of an audiophile, in that I can't really afford to be an audiophile but do what I can with surprising results, and, except for the fact most CDs don't have proper bass response, it all works perfectly fine for my purposes. Actually, it seems that the two songs I got free from iTunes for purchasing... something... have better bass than CD based wav based mp3, but that's a topic for another thread I've been thinking about starting.

Also, converting my .wavs to mp3 saved me 36 GB of space on my hard drive. Think about it.

[EDIT] And a two gig Nano is far easier to carry than the 100 CD tower that went into it.
 

Anarchemitis

New member
Dec 23, 2007
9,102
0
0
Well, I think it's obvious I prefer quality over space in the context of audio. But when something comes as an mp3, I won't convert it to WAV because that'll make it bigger. I keep WAVs the way they are whenever they're encountered. Also, Audacity can't take mp3s.