Yes...but..god I love their insanity.SacremPyrobolum said:I just got the franchise pack.
from $107 to just $27, is steam insane!?
Yes...but..god I love their insanity.SacremPyrobolum said:I just got the franchise pack.
from $107 to just $27, is steam insane!?
Well cupcake...Ryotknife said:how is SA2 better? The story is grittier and more realistic in 2, but that is about it.karcentric said:It's a shame Saints Row: The Third is a pile steaming shit compared to Saints Row 2... But if it's cheap you may as well.
the enemies in SA3 are harder, which is a good thing because the second game was WAY too easy. I could walk into 20 opponents in SA2 and kill them all under 30 seconds with head shots. SA3 it generally takes a few head shots, and they reel from every shot to the head. Plus there are specialists and brutes with brutes taking about 20 headshots to take down. driving is better in SA3.
This is a thing with European developers, they tend to have quad sli/xfire rigs with gobs of RAM and permanent N2 CPU cooling solutions.Thatrocketeer said:What? CD Projekt handled SR2's port? No wonder that shit can't run properly. CD Projekt can't optimize PC games for shit.ThriKreen said:Yeah, the SR2 PC port was handled by CD Projekt, so after all the bad stuff that occured, Volition decided to handle the PC port of SR3 in-house, hence it performs much, much better.
OP: Go for it. It's one hell of an entertaining game. Lots of content too. Even better with Co-op.
Not only that, you could switch between M+KB and controller on the fly. The game would automatically change the on screen prompts based on which you were using last. I found that to be interesting as I've had games where if I forgot to unplug my controller, it would default to it.TheKasp said:The PC version is actually quite a decent port, you can also play with a controller if you want. The price is probably the strongest argument for it.
SR2 runs better on XP (32 and 64) and IIRC, 32 bit versions of Vista and 7. Performs worst on 64 bit 7 and Vista.TheKasp said:It may be worse contentwise but a game can't be better if it is not possible to play it because it is one of the worse ports I've ever laid my fingers on. Saints Row 2 is just a steaming pile of shit because of this.karcentric said:It's a shame Saints Row: The Third is a pile steaming shit compared to Saints Row 2... But if it's cheap you may as well.
To be honest you also get infinite ammo on SR2 without cheats by doing the activities.karcentric said:Ryotknife said:how is SA2 better? The story is grittier and more realistic in 2, but that is about it.karcentric said:It's a shame Saints Row: The Third is a pile steaming shit compared to Saints Row 2... But if it's cheap you may as well.
the enemies in SA3 are harder, which is a good thing because the second game was WAY too easy. I could walk into 20 opponents in SA2 and kill them all under 30 seconds with head shots. SA3 it generally takes a few head shots, and they reel from every shot to the head. Plus there are specialists and brutes with brutes taking about 20 headshots to take down. driving is better in SA3.
And what's with all the damage reduction upgrades? And the infinite ammo, no reloads. Two rather overpowered, game breaking upgrades and it becomes easier easier than SR2 on casual.
Anyway, I don't expect you to agree so whatever sunshine. Each to their own.![]()
But you still have to reload, or has my memory failed me?josemlopes said:To be honest you also get infinite ammo on SR2 without cheats by doing the activities.karcentric said:Ryotknife said:how is SA2 better? The story is grittier and more realistic in 2, but that is about it.karcentric said:It's a shame Saints Row: The Third is a pile steaming shit compared to Saints Row 2... But if it's cheap you may as well.
the enemies in SA3 are harder, which is a good thing because the second game was WAY too easy. I could walk into 20 opponents in SA2 and kill them all under 30 seconds with head shots. SA3 it generally takes a few head shots, and they reel from every shot to the head. Plus there are specialists and brutes with brutes taking about 20 headshots to take down. driving is better in SA3.
And what's with all the damage reduction upgrades? And the infinite ammo, no reloads. Two rather overpowered, game breaking upgrades and it becomes easier easier than SR2 on casual.
Anyway, I don't expect you to agree so whatever sunshine. Each to their own.![]()
To me SR3 is different from SR2 in the same way that SR2 is different from SR1. They are all great but different from each other
I think yes, but there was also those accuracy unlockables that removed any kind of spread, even with the submachines. Difficulty wise SR3 for me is harder, the lack of food, the increase of enemies on screen and those special enemies can be a pain sometimes. In SR2 if you packed food to the mission it usually went well.karcentric said:But you still have to reload, or has my memory failed me?josemlopes said:To be honest you also get infinite ammo on SR2 without cheats by doing the activities.karcentric said:Ryotknife said:how is SA2 better? The story is grittier and more realistic in 2, but that is about it.karcentric said:It's a shame Saints Row: The Third is a pile steaming shit compared to Saints Row 2... But if it's cheap you may as well.
the enemies in SA3 are harder, which is a good thing because the second game was WAY too easy. I could walk into 20 opponents in SA2 and kill them all under 30 seconds with head shots. SA3 it generally takes a few head shots, and they reel from every shot to the head. Plus there are specialists and brutes with brutes taking about 20 headshots to take down. driving is better in SA3.
And what's with all the damage reduction upgrades? And the infinite ammo, no reloads. Two rather overpowered, game breaking upgrades and it becomes easier easier than SR2 on casual.
Anyway, I don't expect you to agree so whatever sunshine. Each to their own.![]()
To me SR3 is different from SR2 in the same way that SR2 is different from SR1. They are all great but different from each other
So don't spend the points on those particular upgrades so there's still some sense of challenge?karcentric said:And what's with all the damage reduction upgrades? And the infinite ammo, no reloads. Two rather overpowered, game breaking upgrades and it becomes easier easier than SR2 on casual.
Buy 2 for the customization. There was so much more for customization in 2. IIRC you could literally have undershirt/bra, shirt, overshirt, followed by a coat.Burig said:I've not played SR or SR2. SR3 was alright, but just felt like it was trying too hard. I would have also loved to have had some more customization options; yes, there were many, but you could only really use crazy costumes as a set, rather than mix them up to make something more interesting.
I would also have said that the port was okay gameplay wise, but not controls - I would advise using a 360 controller if you do buy it.