Star trek: Enterprise

Recommended Videos

Aisaku

New member
Jul 9, 2010
445
0
0
The_root_of_all_evil said:
Pompey71 said:
Personally, I think it's because the more you looked at Bakula, the more you wished he was doing more Quantum Leap instead!
QFT. There was also that atrociously bad theme.

And when Scott Bakula and Dean Stockwell met up, and then Dean pulled a communicator out - you could almost hear the squeal from a thousand nerds.
Agreed. As implausible as more Quantum Leap may be yes, I still hold some hope.

And why linger on Enterprise? There's been rumors of a new series in a pipeline.
 

cookyy2k

Senior Member
Aug 14, 2009
799
0
21
Aisaku said:
The_root_of_all_evil said:
Pompey71 said:
Personally, I think it's because the more you looked at Bakula, the more you wished he was doing more Quantum Leap instead!
QFT. There was also that atrociously bad theme.

And when Scott Bakula and Dean Stockwell met up, and then Dean pulled a communicator out - you could almost hear the squeal from a thousand nerds.
Agreed. As implausible as more Quantum Leap may be yes, I still hold some hope.

And why linger on Enterprise? There's been rumors of a new series in a pipeline.
There was talk of a quantum leap movie in which they finished it off with him finally getting home, what ever happened to that?

Edit: well their is still talk of it, at least there was in Jan http://sciencefictionworld.com/films/science-fiction-films/699-scott-bakula-and-dean-stockwell-to-cameo-in-quantum-leap-movie.html
 

Gaiseric

New member
Sep 21, 2008
1,625
0
0
It's the only Star Trek series that I've found interesting enough to watch consistently and unlike the other series there wasn't a crew member I found annoying. And some of the alien characters I thought were awesome (the Andorian commander and Klingon defense attorney come to mind).

Also it might be because I like Scott Bakula(Quantum Leap!).

And I should point out that I'm not a huge fan of Star Trek so any continuity problems went completely unnoticed by me.
 

Gaiseric

New member
Sep 21, 2008
1,625
0
0
cookyy2k said:
There was talk of a quantum leap movie in which they finished it off with him finally getting home, what ever happened to that?

Edit: well their is still talk of it, at least there was in Jan http://sciencefictionworld.com/films/science-fiction-films/699-scott-bakula-and-dean-stockwell-to-cameo-in-quantum-leap-movie.html
Cool.

Thanks, I hadn't heard they might do a movie.
 

direkiller

New member
Dec 4, 2008
1,655
0
0
TheLiham said:
Radoh said:
People hated it because Patrick Stewart wasn't in it. I too really enjoyed it, but because it wasn't The Next Generation people were mad.
Then explain the popularity of Voyager and Deep Space Nine.

OT: I just thought it wasn't that great of a series. Not every incarnation of a show can be successful.
voyager has 7 of 9(it was on its last leg till "scorpion" seasons 1-3 are some of the most hatted episodes of Startreck)

DS9 has Ben Motherfucking Sissco(and a very commpeling story ark)



Enterprise is considered bad because it tried drawing in the Baywatch crowd. Archer is strangely raciest to the Vulcan(i know this isn't the right term for irrational haterid of an alien but i just dont know what is right). Tupal is annoying. Archer has worse ethics then Janeway most of the time. Most of it's episodes tend to be just meh.

For instance compare
"A night in sickbay" from enterprise to "The Conscience of the king" from TOS now The orignal serise is by far silyer, but which one makes you think more? And that's why alot of older trecky dislike Enterprise it eather is pointless action or speeches less subtle then a hammer
 
Feb 13, 2008
19,430
0
0
cookyy2k said:
There was talk of a quantum leap movie in which they finished it off with him finally getting home, what ever happened to that?

Edit: well their is still talk of it, at least there was in Jan http://sciencefictionworld.com/films/science-fiction-films/699-scott-bakula-and-dean-stockwell-to-cameo-in-quantum-leap-movie.html
He doesn't.

End of the last series explains exactly what's going on - but doesn't - and then it finishes on the note "Doctor Samuel Beckett never returned home."

If they change that...

It won't be pretty.
 

Dusty Fred

New member
Aug 3, 2011
157
0
0
Meh. Enterprise was all right, certainly not awful. The premise was interesting, the production was generally sound (like most trek fans I could never quite get past how the design of the ship mirrored the Akira-class design in almost every detail) and the episodes were sufficiently entertaining.

The problem it had, which it shared with Voyager (although arguably to a lesser extent), was that Star Trek is, at heart, character-driven. Although the Enterprise crew was inoffensive and reasonably distinctive it had no-one to rival the likes of McCoy, Picard, Worf, Sisko... multi-dimensional characters that set up permanent residence in your memory/heart.
 

cookyy2k

Senior Member
Aug 14, 2009
799
0
21
The_root_of_all_evil said:
cookyy2k said:
There was talk of a quantum leap movie in which they finished it off with him finally getting home, what ever happened to that?

Edit: well their is still talk of it, at least there was in Jan http://sciencefictionworld.com/films/science-fiction-films/699-scott-bakula-and-dean-stockwell-to-cameo-in-quantum-leap-movie.html
He doesn't.

End of the last series explains exactly what's going on - but doesn't - and then it finishes on the note "Doctor Samuel Beckett never returned home."

If they change that...

It won't be pretty.
It wouldn't be the first, or biggest thing Hollywood has changed in the name of a "better" film would it?