Star Wars VII Boycott for a weird reason.

Recommended Videos

DefunctTheory

Not So Defunct Now
Mar 30, 2010
6,438
0
0
CaptainMarvelous said:
Jarek Mace said:
I'm not watching it for fear of diversity, I'm holding back from watching it because of forced diversity.

Look, if they can do something good with a female character and a black character then cool, that's great! However, if we start getting SJW vibes and Kylo Ren is an asexual polyarmorous with pronouns then I might just go and live in the middle of Siberia.
o_O why would it be forced diversity? One character is black, the rest are white and they managed to up Star Wars usual average of female characters from 1 per movie to 2 per movie, I'd call that a step up.

Captcha: Full House, only if Ren IS asexual polyamorous and uses Sith/Sithself pronouns.
There's two new main cast members; one is a black, and one has a vagina.

Not enough white penises to satisfy some people, I guess.
 

Thaluikhain

Elite Member
Legacy
Jan 16, 2010
19,538
4,128
118
AccursedTheory said:
CaptainMarvelous said:
Jarek Mace said:
I'm not watching it for fear of diversity, I'm holding back from watching it because of forced diversity.

Look, if they can do something good with a female character and a black character then cool, that's great! However, if we start getting SJW vibes and Kylo Ren is an asexual polyarmorous with pronouns then I might just go and live in the middle of Siberia.
o_O why would it be forced diversity? One character is black, the rest are white and they managed to up Star Wars usual average of female characters from 1 per movie to 2 per movie, I'd call that a step up.

Captcha: Full House, only if Ren IS asexual polyamorous and uses Sith/Sithself pronouns.
There's two new main cast members; one is a black, and one has a vagina.

Not enough white penises to satisfy some people, I guess.
Perzactly. Why weren't they white guys? Was a good reason given for why they weren't? You can't have non-white cishet guys in a movie without giving a good reason, or you are pandering to people that want to see people other than white cishet guys.
 

AbsoluteVirtue18

New member
Jan 14, 2009
3,616
0
0
If these insecure ninnies want to boycott the movie, let them. It's not a big deal, really. All this means is that I won't have too much of a problem finding seats, which was a legit concern for me.
 

Risingblade

New member
Mar 15, 2010
2,893
0
0
I was actually confused to why the guy was black. I thought he was a stormtrooper and stormtroopers were clones of that one bounty hunter.
 

Thaluikhain

Elite Member
Legacy
Jan 16, 2010
19,538
4,128
118
Risingblade said:
I was actually confused to why the guy was black. I thought he was a stormtrooper and stormtroopers were clones of that one bounty hunter.
I think originally they were, but then they recruited normally. It's not like anyone (IIRC) looked like that guy in the original films, though you only saw officers and crew without helmets.

When Luke first sees the princess and he's dressed as a Stormtrooper, she says he's oddly short. This doesn't happen:
 

bat32391

New member
Oct 19, 2011
241
0
0
Sound's like a load of nonsense that was made by trolls, then hi-jacked by morons.
 

Neurotic Void Melody

Bound to escape
Legacy
Jul 15, 2013
4,953
6
13
VaporWare said:
Xsjadoblayde said:
verdant monkai said:
It's embarrassing how whenever anyone online tries to highlight an injustice or racism that affects white people, they get a load of hate and accusations for it. Its got to the point where you aren't even allowed to be proud of your race on and offline.
I usually leave this sort of comment for someone else to reply to, but screw this day; Leaving aside the whole "race" misuse, what is there to be proud of with a skin colour? So much, so that it is justifiable to complain that your preferred entertainment now contains a smaller ratio of people with matching skin colour to yours, without even seeing the main event?
The trouble is, people take cultural pride and then attach it symbolically to some obvious, but ultimately arbitrary phylogenetic trait like skin tone. It's not the skin color they're proud of, it's 'being x' where 'x' takes everything they identify as part of 'their' culture and folding it under the adjective (black, white, red, orange, green, blue, puce, plaid, whatever) that applies to themselves, so that they may liken the source of their pride unto themselves.

As if every light skinned person owned the accomplishments of Tesla and Twain, and every dark skinned person owned the accomplishments of Holley and Hendrix.

This obviously breaks down a bit when one must acknowledge that if skin matters so, then by the transitive qualities of one's skin, one who is proud of being pale must also own the accomplishments of Hitler while anyone prideful of their wealth of melanin must likewise own the achievements of Idi Amin. But rarely do we come to count the demons among ourselves. Melanin is neither a talisman of evil or a ward against it: we all have monsters in our ancestry we'd prefer to forget.

We are well advised not to be proud of the accidents of genetics and breeding that make the shape of us in the world, but what we do to make that shape emblematic of something good in our own lives. We should stand on the shoulders of giants, neither worship them nor rest on their laurels. Nor should we give a thought to whether or not our heroes or demons look much like ourselves: Martin Luther King Jr. was not great because he was black, but because he thought we could do /better/ than we had in extinguishing the falsehoods of skin.

Adolf Hitler was not a monster because he was white, but because he was so proudly wrong about the meaning of skin.
Thankyou for the providing the most sense I have heard all day! Hopefully by quoting you, it furthers the reach of your well worded message. :) The more aware we silly humans are of our misunderstandings, the better life we can weave for ourselves.