Well, hello there.
Okay, so first things first: I played Starcraft 1 and Broodwar several times, primarily the singleplayer campaign, and I loved it. That's probably why I noticed this thing that I'm going to talk about in a moment. Now, with Heart of the Swarm coming out, I watched a video by a fellow who calls himself TotalBiscuit.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LjT1mlf1Kag
So, in it he demonstrates one of the later campaign levels. Spoilers: Kerrigan needs to enter a laboratory and kill Protoss/Zerg-hybrids and hunt down their creator, a shapeshifter called Narud...
Okay. Hybrids-research. Shapeshifter. Narud.
Something seemed odd to me and it didn't take long. At all.
Seriously, Blizzard? You couldn't even be bothered to flip the letters around some if you wanted to use an anagram or, hell, give him a different name entirely? You know? Something a bit more subtle?!
More spoilers, assuming I'm right, of course: Narud. Duran. Duran. Narud.
You know, that mysterious Terran from Broodwar? Who first helped out the UED-forces, only to later join Kerrigan? Only to even later be discovered by Zeratul, doing research on Protoss/Zerg-hybrids?
Are you kidding me? That's the kind of thing an eight-year old would do to trick his friends. Boy, they'll never figure that one out.
Now, TotalBiscuit does mention that the writing is somewhat odd throughout the game. And as you can tell from this post, I haven't actually played it. But this little thing alone bodes fairly badly, doesn't it?
I guess I'm wondering: Is the Narud/Duran-thing representative for the, let's say, complexity and depth of writing that Heart of the Swarm manages to muster?
Sorry. Blizzard has never been particularly great at writing stories[footnote]Although I'll give Blizzard North specifically props for the dark tale of Diablo 1 and the way in which they presented it; already not anywhere near as well done in Diablo 2 or any of their later work, including the Torchlight games which I love immensely but that aren't very interestingly presented when it comes to their story, either.[/footnote]. It's just that this is particularly... I mean... seriously?!
Okay, so first things first: I played Starcraft 1 and Broodwar several times, primarily the singleplayer campaign, and I loved it. That's probably why I noticed this thing that I'm going to talk about in a moment. Now, with Heart of the Swarm coming out, I watched a video by a fellow who calls himself TotalBiscuit.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LjT1mlf1Kag
So, in it he demonstrates one of the later campaign levels. Spoilers: Kerrigan needs to enter a laboratory and kill Protoss/Zerg-hybrids and hunt down their creator, a shapeshifter called Narud...
Okay. Hybrids-research. Shapeshifter. Narud.
Something seemed odd to me and it didn't take long. At all.
Seriously, Blizzard? You couldn't even be bothered to flip the letters around some if you wanted to use an anagram or, hell, give him a different name entirely? You know? Something a bit more subtle?!
More spoilers, assuming I'm right, of course: Narud. Duran. Duran. Narud.
You know, that mysterious Terran from Broodwar? Who first helped out the UED-forces, only to later join Kerrigan? Only to even later be discovered by Zeratul, doing research on Protoss/Zerg-hybrids?
Are you kidding me? That's the kind of thing an eight-year old would do to trick his friends. Boy, they'll never figure that one out.
Now, TotalBiscuit does mention that the writing is somewhat odd throughout the game. And as you can tell from this post, I haven't actually played it. But this little thing alone bodes fairly badly, doesn't it?
I guess I'm wondering: Is the Narud/Duran-thing representative for the, let's say, complexity and depth of writing that Heart of the Swarm manages to muster?
Sorry. Blizzard has never been particularly great at writing stories[footnote]Although I'll give Blizzard North specifically props for the dark tale of Diablo 1 and the way in which they presented it; already not anywhere near as well done in Diablo 2 or any of their later work, including the Torchlight games which I love immensely but that aren't very interestingly presented when it comes to their story, either.[/footnote]. It's just that this is particularly... I mean... seriously?!