personally i find brick walls to be much more agreeable.gmaverick019 said:nevermind, your like talking with a brick wall, nothing is going to change anything in the end, because it still is just a brick wall no matter what you do or say.
personally i find brick walls to be much more agreeable.gmaverick019 said:nevermind, your like talking with a brick wall, nothing is going to change anything in the end, because it still is just a brick wall no matter what you do or say.
Why would it be "******"?!? It would be "BlackRacistWhore". The only "offensive" word is "Whore" which is no where near as offensive as "******". The only offensive word is "Whore" and that is pretty generalcobra_ky said:You very deliberately reversed the scenario so that the programmer is now the defender of the marginalized. Here's the real analogy: The character is a black separatist with an ability that does more damage to white people. The programmer charged with coding the ability decides to call it "RacistNiggerWhore".
Now, you're asking me to believe that the programmer was gravely offended by this design, but instead of bringing it up with management, or refusing to write the code, or asking to have his name scrubbed from the credits, or even quitting entirely, he decided he would protest it by giving the ability an internal name, which under normal circumstances would never be seen by anyone outside the company, and to the uninitiated observer would appear to be a stark racist slur.
Sorry, but I think the much more plausible explanation would be that the programmer is just racist. And I think a sexist programmer is the most plausible explanation for the Dead Island fiasco.
Fine, BlackRacistWhore then. Whatever. But "Whore" is by no means general. It refers specifically to a person who sells their body for sex. In the broadest possible sense, it means someone who sells themselves out.Partezan said:Why would it be "******"?!? It would be "BlackRacistWhore". The only "offensive" word is "Whore" which is no where near as offensive as "******". The only offensive word is "Whore" and that is pretty general
That doesn't make a damn bit of sense. How do her looks, or anyone else's for that matter, damage zombies? It's painful watching you contort logic to try to justify this. Why is it so hard to believe that the programmer may just be a sexist douche?Partezan said:The char gets her skill to do extra damage to men because she used her "looks" so calling a character a whore who whores her looks out is pretty appropriate at describing what's going on.
And that's still pretty fucking offensive, because she isn't a whore in any legitimate sense of the word. And again, never mind the litany of other ways I listed before that he could have expressed this point, rather than sticking in code no one outside the company was ever supposed to see anyway. Why not simply call the ability "SexistPurna"? That conveys the point nicely in a way that is both much more accurate and much harder to misconstrue as denigrating to women.Partezan said:As for Duke Nukem, well, like I said, the only reason i would have an issue with Peruna is because she is EXPECTED to be taken seriously and is a "good character". Duke Nukem picks up crap and writes things on the wall with it... If Peruna picked up some crap and used it as lip stick it would be a different story. If the black supremacist was an evil character and someone coded them offensively to black people i would have a problem, but she is not, she is expected to be the norm, in fact someone to aspire too and the coder is saying NO. That's the way I see it.
If anything the coder is telling women "This woman is a whore and not someone to aspire too". It's not like she earned that skill by being good at assassin school, but if she did how would you be able to get away with targeting men so specifically? She would probably be good at killing people overall which is how the char should have been made in the first place.
It is EXACTLY the same way with females, and it isn't going to change in the next hundred thousand years.intheweeds said:Well, I wish he hadn't written that.
As a woman: it makes me sad. Hearing that makes me feel hurt inside. Not because I have some weird feeling that it affects me in any way, but it just hurts to know there are people out there who would write such things about women - at work where they are supposed to be on their best behavior.
As a woman with male friends: it makes me sad for them because this type of thought process is exactly the reason any women who mistrust men do it. Because a few men think like this and act worse, women are more careful around men. That isn't fair to men who haven't done anything wrong and makes me sad for them.
This type of thing should make everyone sad, really.
That, or this is a labyrinthine in-joke that spawned somewhere in the past 4 years that dead island has been in development that was never designed to be offensive to anyone, kind of how on 4chan "fag" has absolutely no relation to either homosexuality or the tobacco industry. For example, one of my favourite minecraft server has, among others:Hagi said:Wow! That's actually too stupid and sad to be offended by.
This means a programmer actually sat there thinking about the most clear identifier he could use and he came up with "FeministWhore"...
Ah well, just means there is/was a programmer working there with the mental maturity of a pubescent. But there's likely plenty of them around the world, just a shame this had to end up in publicity. Stupidity is generally best reserved for drunken bar trips and anonymous internet rants.
you really need to stop being so sarcastic. people might think you're seriousArcher666 said:Indeed, who cares about hate speech? Why yes, we should call Jewish people the K word, and black people the N word in the street. I mean, we all heard it enough in rap music and the internet, so we should be totally desensitized to that sort of thing.Stall said:Um, alright. Your argument is so smary and sarcastic that it offers absolutely nothing of value, and it is a pretty severe personal attack on top of that. But I'll see what I can do. First, hate speech is bullshit. Second, it's not like a joke in a video game is going to somehow undo 50 years of women's rights. Third, who cares about hateful speech against another human being? In this day and age of instantaneous communication, why does it fucking matter? Don't you see this enough everyday to just not care? They're just words.Archer666 said:Yeah, fuck that shit. Women's rights? The only right they have is staying in the kitchen. Hatespeech against women? Please, its not my fault they dress like whores and seem to believe they're equal to a man. Ain't that right, buddy?
And yes, video games are so much important than hateful language against another human being.
It's a silly fucking joke. Don't make a mountain out of a molehill.
Wait! Video games are violent, and we see this stuff enough not to care right? So, why don't we start murdering eachother? Lets make murder legal! Since its been around for such a long time, why should we care?
about 8 of those pages are posts saying exactly this.Magnikai said:11 pages on this? Really? It's just a stupid line of code gang. No need to get all up in arms about something so trivial.
Well, there's always Dawn of War: Soulstorm with its Sisters of Battle. You also have to consider that Warhammer 40k is a pretty male game. I played the tabletop game once a week for two years and I never saw a single female player. I'm sure that I would never see a single dude if I joined a hardcore knitting circle. Some things have pretty asymmetrical demographics.xXxJessicaxXx said:I had an argument recently with a friend when I mentioned I was sick of playing male characters in FPS games. It came about when I said I felt that making scenarios like Crysis 2 and using the Warhammer lore seemed like an excuse to push female characters out of the games. We can't be in Medal of Honour or Modern Warfare (for obvious reasons) and they seem to want to exclude us from futuristic shooters as well?
I have noticed that Mass Effect 2 and Fallout 3 and Vegas have a huge female following. The core gameplay isn't really that different from the games that the industry demographics say women don't like. Is it the dialogue and rpg aspects or the fact that you can play as a woman the issue? It would be interesting I think for someone to look into that. These developers may be missing a huge chunk of the market simply because they don't want to have a female avatar.
I am not really that angry about this errant bit of code, but it has made me think about these gaming issues a bit more.
Well, Dead Islanders in general are pretty stupid. I saw one guy in a gameplay video who had enough time to set up a small compound yet was still dressed in nothing but swim trunks despite the aforementioned zombie apocalypse. The ************ wasn't even wearing shoes.Undeadpool said:So wait, having a woman in a thigh hugging dress who refuses to take off her stilleto heels, despite a ZOMBIE APOCALYPSE isn't misogynistic enough? This story is kinda like not seeing the forest for the trees.
That's the issue, there isn't one. It needs to be manufactured into an issue, otherwise those that need to feel self-righteous would go without something to be vocal about. (Case and point, this posttmande2nd said:Really?
The company says its in bad taste, and its one moron who wrote that?
What is the issue?