Fr said:
anc[is]This has a lot of potential for abuse from both sides. On the one hand random trolls could doom a project before it even has a chance. On the other hand anyone with a horde of fans could just point them to any random piece of trash and that would get more attention than a decent game no one has heard of before.
It's been confirmed by a Valve employee that downvotes do not remove upvotes. It looks as if all the downvote does is remove the game from your list (not confirmed). And no amount of votes guarantees a game will be added to Steam. All Steam promise is that they'll pay more attention to games that seem to be "getting traction".
ThisNewGuy said:
So what's preventing one developer from creating a bunch of Steam accounts to downvote their competitors and upvote their own game? And isn't this sort of making games even more of a popularity contest?
I'm
assuming voting on Greenlight works the same as other community features (such as chat). I.e. You need to have spent money on your Steam account first. So creating loads of fake accounts could get expensive.
The original release I saw on Greenlight emphasised that it's still the responsibility of the
developer to promote their game. So if they want to prove to Steam that they can get enough "traction" for their game to be a success, they're going to need to drum up some enthusiasm. "Popularity contest" is perhaps a mean way of putting it, but if no one cares about a game, then no one will buy it.