Indeed. The man himself may have passed, but his contributions have shaped and advanced his scientific field for many years, and will most likely continue to do so for many years to come.Pallindromemordnillap said:On the plus side, for a dude who was originally told he'd die before he turned thirty, 76 years spent mostly progressing the world's knowledge of time and space is a damn fine showing
I would not overestimate his contribution.Chimpzy said:Indeed. The man himself may have passed, but his contributions have shaped and advanced his scientific field for many years, and will most likely continue to do so for many years to come.Pallindromemordnillap said:On the plus side, for a dude who was originally told he'd die before he turned thirty, 76 years spent mostly progressing the world's knowledge of time and space is a damn fine showing
I thought his achievements were pretty massive. Did he not demonstrate that Einstein's general theory of relativity implies space and time would have a beginning in the Big Bang and an end in black holes. Thats pretty revolutionary for physics isn't it?Satinavian said:I would not overestimate his contribution.Chimpzy said:Indeed. The man himself may have passed, but his contributions have shaped and advanced his scientific field for many years, and will most likely continue to do so for many years to come.Pallindromemordnillap said:On the plus side, for a dude who was originally told he'd die before he turned thirty, 76 years spent mostly progressing the world's knowledge of time and space is a damn fine showing
He was a good scientists with some important discoveries but he was not some spectacular genius. Just one of many many other good scientists.
The ways he differed from them was that he achieved what he did despite his sickness which is impressive. And that he was also a celebrity who engaged a lot with people outside the scientific community and wrote some books for the general public.
I'm not overestimating him. His contribution to his field is a significant one. His work has advanced science and will likely be taught and used in further research, today and in the future. That there are many others who have also done so doesn't change that.Satinavian said:I would not overestimate his contribution.
He was a good scientists with some important discoveries but he was not some spectacular genius. Just one of many many other good scientists.
The ways he differed from them was that he achieved what he did despite his sickness which is impressive. And that he was also a celebrity who engaged a lot with people outside the scientific community and wrote some books for the general public.
Second that, people talk about him like the second coming of Einstein. There's plenty of room for someone to be a good scientist without reaching that level. By comparison, the Beatles were a massively influential band, but not actually bigger than Jesus.Satinavian said:I would not overestimate his contribution.
He was a good scientists with some important discoveries but he was not some spectacular genius. Just one of many many other good scientists.
The ways he differed from them was that he achieved what he did despite his sickness which is impressive. And that he was also a celebrity who engaged a lot with people outside the scientific community and wrote some books for the general public.
I am willing to listen. I never heard about this kid.Arnoxthe1 said:This is bad news but people, this isn't a tragedy. There can and will be other geniuses.
In fact, I know of one kid who utterly REVOLUTIONIZED nuclear energy but nobody wants to talk about him.
Here ya' go: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taylor_WilsonCoCage said:I am willing to listen. I never heard about this kid.