Ah, my mistake then.Daystar Clarion said:Theory has grounding in fact, these are more akin to a hypothesis.KarumaK said:That's what a theory is?Daystar Clarion said:SNIP*
I have nothing against real psychology, the stuff that actually makes perfect sense and is proved by repetitive correlation. But alot of the the other 'theories' are completely buried in nonsense and speculation.
LIAR! Good guys, psh. I've seen what those you consider good do. My brother saw as well, last thing he ever did see... random mook #2473 do you remember him! DO YOU ASSHOLE! No, you don't even have a clue.brandon237 said:The good guys are genuinely good, the evil ones just greedy. If the evil one were true evil, like prototype evil, then the results may differ.Jaredin said:Really dont see how this can be measured so easilly, so im going to take it with a pinch of salt.
But, if this is true then goes to prove why goodguy always wins in the end, lol
People have different muscle strengths and staminas, I don't think making an average of peoples strengths would really be that accurate.Logan Westbrook said:Strong Morals Make Strong Bodies
The team found that those who were charitable could keep the weight up for an average of ten seconds longer than those who kept the money.
Permalink
Thank you for saying this so I don't have to. Statements like "I'm not about to second guess a bunch of Harvard psychologists" are exactly why they can get away with this kind of research, no matter how crazy the outcome. "Never mind the confusion between correlation and causation - we went to Harvard, goddammit!"experiment0789 said:Why not Question them, a bunch of Harvard psychologists can make mistakes too!Logan Westbrook said:As weird as the methodology sounds, I'm not about to second guess a bunch of Harvard psychologists.
I would have to know more about these experiments before I can believe this, not just because it's hard to believe, but on how they ran the experiments.
They may be Researchers at Harvard, but it still seems.......like they're missing something.
Nothing, it's more equivalent to the neutral aspect of the second test.KushinLos said:What exactly is immoral in keeping a dollar you've been given?
Captain NefariousLogan Westbrook said:nefarious
Well I will. It's a pretty basic fallacy: correlation does not imply causation.I'm not about to second guess a bunch of Harvard psychologists.