Haha, I should specify. I'm from Illinois and they had just linked to the Associated Press article in our paper. I've never even been to Baltimore.xmetatr0nx said:Wow, crappy way to go, too much blood. Im staying away from your sword carrying baltimor neighborhood.
That doesn't say enough. Though for all of you who say he's done and jailed, He can claim self-defence if the guy attacked him first, and thus he's safe.BigDragun987 said:Crazy Supreme Awesome Win.
It was in America.Reuq said:Was this UK, or America, or what? If its UK then thats him gone for life. Shame really, he is clearly made of win(I feel dirty for talking like that)
Yeah but I hope he can prove it and what-not. I've seen plenty of cases where self defence should have over-ruled but didn't and those cases had much more evidence than I believe this one willdstryfe said:That doesn't say enough. Though for all of you who say he's done and jailed, He can claim self-defence if the guy attacked him first, and thus he's safe.BigDragun987 said:Crazy Supreme Awesome Win.
Ain't that the truth. He might be able to get away with self defence, but a sharpened katana isn't to be sniffed at. Though that being said, what if it were a butcher knife from the kitchen instead?VanityGirl said:Haven't heard of that one.
That kid's going to prison though.
Take away the "again" and that's pretty much me. I have two swords, and while if forced I would use them, I certainly wouldn't want to. That would have been a grisly end.SharPhoe said:*Looks at the katana lying under his bed*
...Let's hope that kind of thing doesn't happen again, huh?
Were they in their own homes? Dealing with B&Es? I sure hope not, or the juries in question just shafted them.BigDragun987 said:I've seen plenty of cases where self defence should have over-ruled but didn't and those cases had much more evidence than I believe this one will