Kirkby said:
Hey everyone, to catch up none UK residents and people not watching the news....
First of all in the UK the government is raising the annual fee of £3000 to £9000 for university students, this has caused a lot of anger and today a protest turned a little violent today.
Students stormed the Millbank tower and began protesting there. Windows were smashed and bonfires lit but no one was seriously hurt. The media is up in arms about it and everyone is calling it a disgrace. But is it?
I mean as far as i know no ones been hurt and the most violent thing i saw was window smashing and its gotten the nations attention, unlike every other "peaceful" protest so maybe something will now be done.
So topic for discussion.. If youv been following this on the news are you for or against this protest? If you dont live in the UK/dont know wtf is going on, do you think peaceful protests are effective? Or is it sometimes good to cause a stir to raise awareness for an important cause
p.s just to state its important to remember there have been no serious injuries, obviously very violent protests are always wrong
I assume you're referring to the Demolition protest today? My university union, here in Leeds, actually had coaches prepared to take students and staff (yes, here in Leeds even the lecturers and staff are protesting against the government's plans to raise tuition fee caps) down to London to take part. In our student paper on Friday I'm expecting heavy coverage of the event and the response by the government, since it is something that affects a lot of people.
Personally, I'm lucky, as I'm in my final year now. My brother is in Sixth Form and he'll be going to university next year, so it won't affect him in first year but I don't know if he'll have to pay the higher rate in his second year, from 2012. Our VC (Vice Chancellor, the guy in charge) went on record when the Browne Report was published as saying he wants to raise the Leeds tuition fees to £9000, to much controversy on campus. The stupid thing is, he still advocates things like new buildings and stuff, and stupid things like having University Council meet in fancy hotels when there are perfectly good spaces on campus, and decides to make cuts like getting rid of the School of English Library, when there are plenty of other things he could cut instead to save costs. Oh, and the Leeds budget was reported last year as being about £20 million in deficit, latest figures show that was overestimated (deliberately) and we're only about £2 million in deficit, a very manageable amount. As I say, the 'mistake' has also been found to have been deliberate to try and justify some of the more extreme cuts like making a lot of 'non-essential' staff redundant.
Protestors at our university, in a group called LUAC (Leeds University Against Cuts) actually sent letters to the PM, Deputy PM, and our own VC last week, containing bills that the recipients are supposed to pay, since they didn't have to pay for their education (when they went to university it was government-sponsored, no tuition fees whatsoever), so they have no experience of being in debt like we do. I'm expecting to leave university with around £30,000 of debt. Luckily I live fairly frugally anyway, so by the time I'm earning above the threshold to start paying that back I'll be able to manage, but many others won't. Hell, I'd even be happy to pay graduate tax, like the Lib Dems (who I voted for) suggested. The MP I voted for, in my constituency, is a Lib Dem, Greg Mulholland. He met with students and he's come out as saying, since before the election, and even now, that he supports graduate tax rather than tuition fee increases, and that if it comes to a vote in Parliament he'll vote against the Browne reccomendations. Let's just hope the rest of the government sees sense and follows suit, before it's too late.