Urgh, I far preferred the new look. I liked Old Cole's voice and yellow attire, but I hated his baldy-ness. I thought it was so much better that he had hair and tattoos. Disappointed now.
Ahahahahahaha! Nice joke Sucker Punch.Sucker Punch has said it wants Uncharted 2 [http://www.escapistmagazine.com/news/view/101172-Sucker-Punch-inFamous-2-Will-Induce-A-Heart-Attack], so maybe it doesn't want there to be any hitches.
Umm, they successfully ended the Sly Cooper series after 3 great games. Just because a game (and a story-based game especially) was good is no reason to make a sequel. Unless they have a really important story to tell in that universe, or a new take on the gameplay, I don't see any reason to continue a story which received a satisfactory and fulfilling conclusion.benbenthegamerman said:Well, as much as i like this change (huge infamous fan), i have something to say to sucker punch.
BRING BACK SLY COOPER! GOD DAMMIT! STOP WITH THE INFAMOUS AND GET BACK TO MAKING MY FAVORITE GAME SERIES OF ALL TIME YOU DAMN FANTASTIC GAME COMPANY!!!
Indeed.
I agree. Everything was fine except the voice and face... Well, and the pants looked ridiculous, but that's not important. You just cant replace your main character with someone else (different voice/face) and give him the same name and think no one will notice. It doesn't work in movie sequels, why would it work in games?elcamino41383 said:Many have probably said it, I just don't feel like reading more at the moment. Yay for being lazy! Anyway, I didn't mind the hair, or the tattoos. Who knows, maybe he had tattoos the whole time? We just couldn't see them because of his attire. For me it was mostly the voice and the fact that facially he just didn't look like Cole to me at all.
Indeed but I could have dealt with the crappy pants if he was still the same/remotely the same, Cole. HahaBrokenSanity said:I agree. Everything was fine except the voice and face... Well, and the pants looked ridiculous, but that's not important. You just cant replace your main character with someone else (different voice/face) and give him the same name and think no one will notice. It doesn't work in movie sequels, why would it work in games?elcamino41383 said:Many have probably said it, I just don't feel like reading more at the moment. Yay for being lazy! Anyway, I didn't mind the hair, or the tattoos. Who knows, maybe he had tattoos the whole time? We just couldn't see them because of his attire. For me it was mostly the voice and the fact that facially he just didn't look like Cole to me at all.
Haha! Exactly, witch is why I said it wasn't important. I agree completelyelcamino41383 said:Indeed but I could have dealt with the crappy pants if he was still the same/remotely the same, Cole. HahaBrokenSanity said:I agree. Everything was fine except the voice and face... Well, and the pants looked ridiculous, but that's not important. You just cant replace your main character with someone else (different voice/face) and give him the same name and think no one will notice. It doesn't work in movie sequels, why would it work in games?elcamino41383 said:Many have probably said it, I just don't feel like reading more at the moment. Yay for being lazy! Anyway, I didn't mind the hair, or the tattoos. Who knows, maybe he had tattoos the whole time? We just couldn't see them because of his attire. For me it was mostly the voice and the fact that facially he just didn't look like Cole to me at all.
Well, neither alternative was really that original. The original Cole was akin to a bald space-marine and the new Cole was a teen Nathan Drake.saintchristopher said:Oh good, now their character can go back to looking like EVERYONE ELSE IN VIDEOGAMES TODAY.
It would't have been so bad if they'd just given him hair. They made him like a complete twat.Tom Goldman said:Still, can't a guy grow his hair out and get a few tattoos without getting criticized?