Suicide Squad reviews are in and it sounds like they should of stayed locked up

Recommended Videos

Dizchu

...brutal
Sep 23, 2014
1,277
0
0
I was expecting this to be another mediocre mess from DC. They just can't seem to do it right, probably because they've been so humourless about it while Marvel's had self-awareness. Christopher Nolan's Batman films weren't goofy, but they made up for the lack of "fun" with raw talent and excitement. People like Zack Snyder can never hope to replicate that success, yet they try to do it over and over again. It's embarrassing.
 

Zontar

Mad Max 2019
Feb 18, 2013
4,931
0
0
Xsjadoblayde said:
Never trust the editors. Or the editor overseers. Or review embargos. Or me.
Zeconte said:
None of which causes Fox to release crappy movies no one wants to watch, nor prevents them from making good movies that people will actually go out and see, so to act like any of this is at all relevant to how poorly Fox has handled the Fantastic 4 movie rights is pretty ridiculous.
Well then Fox screwed the pouch on that one.
why wouldn't they focus on the properties they're actually making money from rather than FF? That's not sabotage, that's just a sound business decision.
Because as it stands in the comics very few lines are doing well, and FF was one of them before it got cancelled. That's to say nothing of the fact merchandise isn't as much of a zero sum game as many think for a company like Marvel in its current Disney owned state. Making a few hundred thousand Fantastic Four toys to sell along side their Spider-Man and Avengers ones wouldn't be likely to detract from those other ones. Removing them from shelves was pure spite towards Fox.
 

MatParker116

New member
Feb 4, 2009
2,430
0
0
Zontar said:
Xsjadoblayde said:
Never trust the editors. Or the editor overseers. Or review embargos. Or me.
Zeconte said:
None of which causes Fox to release crappy movies no one wants to watch, nor prevents them from making good movies that people will actually go out and see, so to act like any of this is at all relevant to how poorly Fox has handled the Fantastic 4 movie rights is pretty ridiculous.
Well then Fox screwed the pouch on that one.
why wouldn't they focus on the properties they're actually making money from rather than FF? That's not sabotage, that's just a sound business decision.
Because as it stands in the comics very few lines are doing well, and FF was one of them before it got cancelled. That's to say nothing of the fact merchandise isn't as much of a zero sum game as many think for a company like Marvel in its current Disney owned state. Making a few hundred thousand Fantastic Four toys to sell along side their Spider-Man and Avengers ones wouldn't be likely to detract from those other ones. Removing them from shelves was pure spite towards Fox.
Marvel was pissed about how the film was made so Ike Perlmutter ordered the IP trashed.
 

Zontar

Mad Max 2019
Feb 18, 2013
4,931
0
0
MatParker116 said:
Marvel was pissed about how the film was made so Ike Perlmutter ordered the IP trashed.
A rare instance of Perlmutter not actively making the MCU worst. Seriously after the shit he pulled leaving to Feige going straight to Disney and demanding he answer to them directly or he'd quit to get Marvel Studios out from under him, I have no idea how he continues to operate Marvel Television and Marvel Incorporated. He's the only reason the Netflix series, AoS and the movies aren't having more cameos and cross overs, the ones everyone and their dog have been demanding since the movies stopped being the only MCU properties.
 

Saltyk

Sane among the insane.
Sep 12, 2010
16,755
0
0
Scarim Coral said:
DudeistBelieve said:
whatever, I'm still gonna see it.
Same, just to spite Superman Vs Batman.
Honestly, I was doing the opposite. BvS was so God awful that it killed my interest in Suicide Squad, which I was actually looking forward to as opposed to BvS.

undeadsuitor said:
Dc needs to learn some better editing. It would help if they stopped shoving flashbacks into everything
Flashbacks and dream sequences. We can't forget the dream sequences. Every movie needs 12 dream sequences!
 

DefunctTheory

Not So Defunct Now
Mar 30, 2010
6,438
0
0
Scarim Coral said:
DudeistBelieve said:
whatever, I'm still gonna see it.
Same, just to spite Superman Vs Batman.
...How are you spiting Dawn of Justice... by proving to WB that you'll buy a ticket to a DC movie no matter what the hell they shovel into it the franchise?
 

Samtemdo8_v1legacy

New member
Aug 2, 2015
7,915
0
0
Saltyk said:
Scarim Coral said:
DudeistBelieve said:
whatever, I'm still gonna see it.
Same, just to spite Superman Vs Batman.
Honestly, I was doing the opposite. BvS was so God awful that it killed my interest in Suicide Squad, which I was actually looking forward to as opposed to BvS.

undeadsuitor said:
Dc needs to learn some better editing. It would help if they stopped shoving flashbacks into everything

Flashbacks and dream sequences. We can't forget the dream sequences. Every movie needs 12 dream sequences!
Alright blind DC fanboy side mode on.

You have not seen many movies if you think BvS was the worst thing ever :p

And I come from the opinion that BvS is at worst a 3/5 "meh I've seen worse, but it could have been better"

I am just flabbergasted that it's being treated as bad on the level of the Room, Gigli, Birdemic, and Food Fight.

Unbelievably unfair and overly high standards
 

Evonisia

Your sinner, in secret
Jun 24, 2013
3,257
0
0
Samtemdo8 said:
Saltyk said:
Alright blind DC fanboy side mode on.

You have not seen many movies if you think BvS was the worst thing ever :p

And I come from the opinion that BvS is at worst a 3/5 "meh I've seen worse, but it could have been better"

I am just flabbergasted that it's being treated as bad on the level of the Room, Gigli, Birdemic, and Food Fight.

Unbelievably unfair and overly high standards
Wait aren't most of those films[footnote]Besides "Gigli" I guess[/footnote] you listed regarded as so-bad-it's-good ludicrously enjoyable watches despite reaching new levels of awful?

The hate for BvS, at least most of what I've seen of course, was just that it sucked. A lot.

OT: Well that's a shame. Given how editing was one of the big complaints about BvS as well I'm getting the impression these films are either trying to do way too much and/or are just being stepped on from the higher-ups to compensate for the middling commercial performance of the DCCU thus far.
 

MatParker116

New member
Feb 4, 2009
2,430
0
0
Evonisia said:
Samtemdo8 said:
Saltyk said:
Alright blind DC fanboy side mode on.

You have not seen many movies if you think BvS was the worst thing ever :p

And I come from the opinion that BvS is at worst a 3/5 "meh I've seen worse, but it could have been better"

I am just flabbergasted that it's being treated as bad on the level of the Room, Gigli, Birdemic, and Food Fight.

Unbelievably unfair and overly high standards
Wait aren't most of those films[footnote]Besides "Gigli" I guess[/footnote] you listed regarded as so-bad-it's-good ludicrously enjoyable watches despite reaching new levels of awful?

The hate for BvS, at least most of what I've seen of course, was just that it sucked. A lot.

OT: Well that's a shame. Given how editing was one of the big complaints about BvS as well I'm getting the impression these films are either trying to do way too much and/or are just being stepped on from the higher-ups to compensate for the middling commercial performance of the DCCU thus far.
To use Marvel as an example Carol Danvers was moments from appearing at the end of AOU in place of Scarlett Witch, one of the many reasons she was cut was that Civil War would have had to dance around the fact that here is a woman who is a Hulk you can reason with. On top of that if you hit her hard enough she turns into a cosmic force, who ever gives her the successful pitch would win easily.
 

Zenja

New member
Jan 16, 2013
192
0
0
Zontar said:
Andy Shandy said:
Marvel looking at reviews like
Actually they aren't. Contrary to what people believe, Marvel wants DC to succeed. When a movie fails, it harms those around it, and this is double for movies in the same genre (or, as is the case with superheroes, a perceived genre that isn't actually a genre). Suicide Squad failing isn't good for Marvel, and if it happens hard enough could be financially detrimental to them.
This. The rivalry is only from fans. I was a Marvel fanboy growing up but nowadays, I am just too old to care. I still love Batman and Flash and Superman. I still want them to have good movies. I would rather have a movie shelf with both good Marvel and DC movies on it than care about some pissing match.

My take away from all the "editing" comments is that this movie suffered from them wanting to re-imagine the film so late. On top of the fact that it was built on a sour premise. Super Hero movies are popular right now. It is still a huge gamble to make a super villain movie and try to make them super heroes that are still villains. Even if you do use Batman's villains. (Though that could just be my tastes.) I was never interested in this movie and was shocked other people were.

Samtemdo8 said:
Alright blind DC fanboy side mode on.

You have not seen many movies if you think BvS was the worst thing ever :p

And I come from the opinion that BvS is at worst a 3/5 "meh I've seen worse, but it could have been better"

I am just flabbergasted that it's being treated as bad on the level of the Room, Gigli, Birdemic, and Food Fight.

Unbelievably unfair and overly high standards
I think the reason BvS is so flabbergasting is that the movie didn't have to be great, it just had to be good and fun. Many of us grew up watching Keaton and Reeve's in theatres. These were fun super hero movies. We all went into BvS wanting to like it, and willing to grade it on a curve. Wanting to see the long overdue Batman and Superman in the same movie having friendly cometition, duke it out, then work together. We were not expecting some long winded mope fest of Super hypocrit vs. Hypocrit man. I could go on and on about this movie but the big thing to take away is this, even a generic movie with both Batman and Superman that was focused on fun would have went over better. This emo movie we got was a huge drag. You come out of the movie feeling depressed. The whole movie is depressing scene after depressing scene with an occasional brutal action sequence and ends with a death.

Not saying Gal Gadot did a bad job (I have actually been stoked about her movie since it was announced, moreso since the trailer) but I think the reason people really loved her in BvS despite not being there much is she is the only person who had an upbeat feel to her. Whenever she showed up, the movie lightened the hell up and we got a break from all the sulking and pessimism that just drowns that movie. Because apparently that's what they think people want in superhero movies, sulking and pessimism. It didn't have to be great "meh" would have let people love it.

Was it the worst writing ever? No, but that isn't to its credit. (And it was pretty bad) But it made a bigger mistake. It had no idea why the crowds came out to see the movie. It misunderstood its audience's draw. That is why it gets so much hate. I don't believe standards were too high, maybe in some cases, but rather that standards were fair and that movie is pretentious as fuck. I say that because it feels like it is trying for an Oscar with its "depth" but it's writing never gets past shallow interpretation of a deeper idea. It does the thing where it throws out ideas with possible depth but then never explores them and what I can only guess just hopes the audience will see a potentially deep concept and embrace the movie as deep because of it. But any deep analysis of the movie just shows a bunch of problems with the writing.
 

sniddy_v1legacy

New member
Jul 10, 2010
265
0
0
BvS was bad, the pacing was bad, the plot was bad, Lex was oh-so bad (and not in a good way)

the way the fight was 'made' bad, the whole dream sequence bad, the flash cut in, bad (and trying too hard don the whole foreshadow thing)

Wonder Women, good, the cheeky Aquaman etc teasers, I liked I know others though it forced...but tha'st me. Final Fight, awesome in part because Wonder Women...but some annoying parts

Moving on

I don't think I'll bother seeing SS - it looks like another confused mess to throw some IPs at a wall and go 'ohhh edgy' and yeh Joker...no, no,no I also kinda hate seeing HQ being turned into a damaged sex kitten, and not a lot else....

I'll catch it when it comes up on the movie channel or something, maybe borrow the DVD off someone, but the initial reviews are what I expected - Did go to see Beyond, after the last 2 I was dubious but the reviews did make me give it a shot....

So in short - Looks like a poorly plotted mess, using a little Sex sales and big name appeal to try and churn a popcorn action flick with big actors, famous characters and try to gloss over that it doesn't gel at all and is just a loud colourful mess
 

Saltyk

Sane among the insane.
Sep 12, 2010
16,755
0
0
Samtemdo8 said:
Saltyk said:
Scarim Coral said:
DudeistBelieve said:
whatever, I'm still gonna see it.
Same, just to spite Superman Vs Batman.
Honestly, I was doing the opposite. BvS was so God awful that it killed my interest in Suicide Squad, which I was actually looking forward to as opposed to BvS.

undeadsuitor said:
Dc needs to learn some better editing. It would help if they stopped shoving flashbacks into everything

Flashbacks and dream sequences. We can't forget the dream sequences. Every movie needs 12 dream sequences!
Alright blind DC fanboy side mode on.

You have not seen many movies if you think BvS was the worst thing ever :p

And I come from the opinion that BvS is at worst a 3/5 "meh I've seen worse, but it could have been better"

I am just flabbergasted that it's being treated as bad on the level of the Room, Gigli, Birdemic, and Food Fight.

Unbelievably unfair and overly high standards
Here's the problem. Those movies are bad. Objectively worse than BvS. However, they are entertainingly bad. They are so bad that you can laugh at them and enjoy that.

BvS was just plain bad. Boring bad. Bad in a way that you just didn't care about or enjoy it. The Room may be a 1/10 while BvS is a 3/10, but that's almost a bigger sin. I can't even laugh at how incompetently it was put together.
 

Samtemdo8_v1legacy

New member
Aug 2, 2015
7,915
0
0
Evonisia said:
Samtemdo8 said:
Saltyk said:
Alright blind DC fanboy side mode on.

You have not seen many movies if you think BvS was the worst thing ever :p

And I come from the opinion that BvS is at worst a 3/5 "meh I've seen worse, but it could have been better"

I am just flabbergasted that it's being treated as bad on the level of the Room, Gigli, Birdemic, and Food Fight.

Unbelievably unfair and overly high standards
Wait aren't most of those films[footnote]Besides "Gigli" I guess[/footnote] you listed regarded as so-bad-it's-good ludicrously enjoyable watches despite reaching new levels of awful?

The hate for BvS, at least most of what I've seen of course, was just that it sucked. A lot.

OT: Well that's a shame. Given how editing was one of the big complaints about BvS as well I'm getting the impression these films are either trying to do way too much and/or are just being stepped on from the higher-ups to compensate for the middling commercial performance of the DCCU thus far.
No No No the "Its so bad its good" arguement is just giving these shit movies a pass.

It would only work if you watch it through a comedic video review ala Nostalgia Critic, etc.

Watching them as in on there own is a miserable experiance, I mean I still wonder why would anyone watch these movies.

Saltyk said:
Samtemdo8 said:
Saltyk said:
Scarim Coral said:
DudeistBelieve said:
whatever, I'm still gonna see it.
Same, just to spite Superman Vs Batman.
Honestly, I was doing the opposite. BvS was so God awful that it killed my interest in Suicide Squad, which I was actually looking forward to as opposed to BvS.

undeadsuitor said:
Dc needs to learn some better editing. It would help if they stopped shoving flashbacks into everything

Flashbacks and dream sequences. We can't forget the dream sequences. Every movie needs 12 dream sequences!
Alright blind DC fanboy side mode on.

You have not seen many movies if you think BvS was the worst thing ever :p

And I come from the opinion that BvS is at worst a 3/5 "meh I've seen worse, but it could have been better"

I am just flabbergasted that it's being treated as bad on the level of the Room, Gigli, Birdemic, and Food Fight.

Unbelievably unfair and overly high standards
Here's the problem. Those movies are bad. Objectively worse than BvS. However, they are entertainingly bad. They are so bad that you can laugh at them and enjoy that.

BvS was just plain bad. Boring bad. Bad in a way that you just didn't care about or enjoy it. The Room may be a 1/10 while BvS is a 3/10, but that's almost a bigger sin. I can't even laugh at how incompetently it was put together.
What I said.
 

FPLOON

Your #1 Source for the Dino Porn
Jul 10, 2013
12,531
0
0
Fuck it! I'm watching this shit! Like fuck am I going to let my apparent hype not take over my choice of movie-watching in theaters! It's Anchorman 2 all over again!!

Other than that, "poor editing"? Does that mean that the trailers really did have the "better editing"??
 

JemothSkarii

Thanks!
Nov 9, 2010
1,169
0
0
Jokes on them: I wasn't seeing it anyway! HAH!

But then I don't know the last time I got interested in a superhero movie. I've been pleasantly surprised (got dragged to Guardians of the Galaxy and Deadpool, so for free movies they were alright) but nothing that's like 'THE MCU IS SOMETHING I AM HYPE FOR'.

I'm gonna end this on the fact that I've really only loved the Hellblazer comics (and that's only because I just started reading them). We got a constantine show but that was cancelled, as good as it was. Take it as a seperate entity and I even find the Keanu film watchable (mostly out of a love for Keanu).

Besides, this movie will end up like a whole bunch where the critics hate it but the audience loved it.
 

bastardofmelbourne

New member
Dec 11, 2012
1,038
0
0
Well that's...disappointing. I mean, I didn't expect it to turn out well, but at this point I was hoping it would succeed just for the sake of the greater film franchise.

I'll have to see it for myself. I lost all faith in critics after I read some of the reviews for Batman v Superman. People can't tell a bad movie from an okay one, these days. And don't put out that "it wasn't bad enough to be good" garbage. That's basically saying that it was so good that it was bad, and if we're at that stage semantically speaking, we may as well retire the English language.

What the hell is wrong with critics accepting mediocrity? I think they just need the attention/page views that comes with accentuating the negative.

(I blame Yahtzee.)