If it's euthanasia for something like cancer, then sure. If it's depression and the likes, help is needed or they make the biggest mistake, everything can always get better.
I figured it might have been hypothetical, still, had to be sureLongshot said:No, I wasn't, but I suppose it could be read that way. It was more of a hypothetical sittuation. Why, supposing I was sucidal, would I have to carry my suffering, just for the sake of others? Surely, it is my choice whether I live or not.ZeroMachine said:snip
The problem with the example is that it is too hypothetical. There's no way I could ever know that for sure.ZeroMachine said:I figured it might have been hypothetical, still, had to be sureLongshot said:No, I wasn't, but I suppose it could be read that way. It was more of a hypothetical sittuation. Why, supposing I was sucidal, would I have to carry my suffering, just for the sake of others? Surely, it is my choice whether I live or not.ZeroMachine said:snip
And yes, it really is your choice, but every choice has consequences. Another hypothetical situation (that is fairly depressing): Let's say you were married and had a son, and you caught a glimpse of a possible future where if you killed yourself your son would soon follow. If you were in that situation, would you still go through with it?
I think I've thought of something like that before, but I didn't know that was an actual scientific theory.BallPtPenTheif said:Actually, I heard one theory that the afterlife experience might just be a hallucination that occurs when the brain degrades or deteorates at the rate of the golden ratio. Theoretically it could create an expansive hallucination that could seem to last for an eternity if not a very long time.cuddly_tomato said:If you don't mind me asking... why drowning? I mean... jeez that's got to be one of the worst ways to go out.
So drowning, bleeding to death, etc... would be ideal ways to go if you bought into that theory.