Little Duck said:
Megacherv said:
To the US:-
Imagine the Daily Mail as the British newspaper equivalent to Fox News
There we go
Except fewer people read it. I'm pretty sure not even it's readers take it seriously any more.
The Daily Mail, monstrous as it is, has a circulation of 2.1m. Its only real competitor is
The Sun - which has a UK circulation of around 3m (and a truly horrifying worldwide circulation of 7.7m).
The Sun is owned by News International aka Rupert 'Fox News' Murdoch. So is
The Times (500,000 readers), which is our most successful broadsheet (although it's tabloid-size nowadays, isn't it? Never mind).
There's no getting away from the fact that the most successful 'newspapers' in the UK are all heavily Conservative (they're selling to 'middle England', remember) - so it's not necessarily bad reporting to pick one of those when you want a UK perspective.
Even if picking the
Mail is rather a lot like picking
Fox News (which is part of the point, really; their insane, over-the-top right-wing nonsense makes for a more entertaining article)
hudsonzero said:
ok for the last time escapist, stop using the daily mail as your source of news from over here, use a paper like the independent or even the guardian (say what you want about it, but i like my wall-charts)
That would just be shifting from a right-wing tabloid to a left-wing tabloid.
While I quite often enjoy pieces from
The Independent (especially Johann Hari) and
The Guardian (I've even written for them), they are just the left-wing equivalents of the Daily Mail - there's still considerable bias present in the reporting, it's just more palatable to those of us who aren't Tories.
(although the Grauniad and the Independent do tend to make up stories a bit less than the Mail, I hope)