Exactly what I was thinking.zauxz said:No way. But what will they blame everything on now?
I'm not sure I understood that sentence, Switzerland doesn't use euros.LunaticFringe said:You know what Swiss government, I'll be making sure not to spend any tourist Euros in your country the next time I'm in Europe.
Ah sorry, I was still in the process of reading the rest of the topic when I replied.LunaticFringe said:I know, I was corrected a few pages ago haha. [..]wildpeaks said:I'm not sure I understood that sentence, Switzerland doesn't use euros.LunaticFringe said:You know what Swiss government, I'll be making sure not to spend any tourist Euros in your country the next time I'm in Europe.
Their standing army is purely defensive. As a matter-of-fact, it is a method to slow down wars between neighbors. It comes from a long history of playing doormat to European empires. Switzerland is a very useful through-way for Europe, by remaining neutral, and having an army to make sure armies don't walk through anyway, they help keep wars from progressing. They don't like violence, but they understand unarmed "peacekeepers" will find themselves in it anyway, on the receiving end.theultimateend said:So no violent video games but...killing people in the real world is fine?Nuke_em_05 said:Essentially every male over 21 in their country is an active (and armed) reservist... if that helps.KillerMidget said:And that gives me the clawing and incorrigible impression that people there are boring, no matter what might be the contrary.Nuke_em_05 said:It seems that they (as a nation) have decided that they don't want it in their country.
Stupidity is the biggest epidemic ever.crimsonshrouds said:WOW the stupid virus is spreading
So...they understand that a defensive army is required in reality. But they don't understand that there are no credible studies that show any long term negative effects from playing video games violent or not?Nuke_em_05 said:Their standing army is purely defensive. As a matter-of-fact, it is a method to slow down wars between neighbors. It comes from a long history of playing doormat to European empires. Switzerland is a very useful through-way for Europe, by remaining neutral, and having an army to make sure armies don't walk through anyway, they help keep wars from progressing. They don't like violence, but they understand unarmed "peacekeepers" will find themselves in it anyway, on the receiving end.theultimateend said:So no violent video games but...killing people in the real world is fine?Nuke_em_05 said:Essentially every male over 21 in their country is an active (and armed) reservist... if that helps.KillerMidget said:And that gives me the clawing and incorrigible impression that people there are boring, no matter what might be the contrary.Nuke_em_05 said:It seems that they (as a nation) have decided that they don't want it in their country.
Maybe they don't understand why violence of extreme gore is necessary in a videogame?theultimateend said:So...they understand that a defensive army is required in reality. But they don't understand that there are no credible studies that show any long term negative effects from playing video games violent or not?Nuke_em_05 said:Their standing army is purely defensive. As a matter-of-fact, it is a method to slow down wars between neighbors. It comes from a long history of playing doormat to European empires. Switzerland is a very useful through-way for Europe, by remaining neutral, and having an army to make sure armies don't walk through anyway, they help keep wars from progressing. They don't like violence, but they understand unarmed "peacekeepers" will find themselves in it anyway, on the receiving end.theultimateend said:So no violent video games but...killing people in the real world is fine?Nuke_em_05 said:Essentially every male over 21 in their country is an active (and armed) reservist... if that helps.KillerMidget said:And that gives me the clawing and incorrigible impression that people there are boring, no matter what might be the contrary.Nuke_em_05 said:It seems that they (as a nation) have decided that they don't want it in their country.
They do realize there is far more crime related to sports and sports fans than ever in the history of video gaming (or even board gaming, surprised right, I figured ;D).
So perhaps they should ban any sports in their country first? They'd be safer that way.
Especially if Soccer(football) happens to be popular there.
Well steam wont sell Final Fantasy XI to people in sweden so im guessing they can put the law on steam.Onyx Oblivion said:I'll mail them to you!
DON'T WORRY SWISS GAMERS!
What about downloadable violent games? Like on XBLA, PSN, and Steam? Will this affect them, too?
Souplex said:Only Switzerland could do something so horribly netural!
And to you too.Twilight_guy said:What happened to you Switzerland? You used to be cool man.
I think people will just illegally import the games if they really want them. On top of that, I doubt if the police have the time to crack down on illegal game ownership so I'm sure there will be a black market. Oh well, I feel bad for ya Swiss gamers.
Actually, it would be hard to find a game that didn't show violence to humans or quasi humans. Seriously, someone name one good game where nothing violent happens to people (of any species) at all.Sworm said:Thank you,Furburt said:Hell, you could easily count Zelda games in that!Sworm said:(note that "violent" games are defined as those who show "scenes of cruelty towards humans or quasi-humans". In short this would count most PEGI 16 - 18 games)
Oh, and welcome to The Escapist!
Enjoy your stay.
And yes you can include Zelda, probably along with Mario, Kirby, heck even Sonic or Pokemon, And don't get me started on 360 and PS3 games.
Getting the 40'000 signatures for a Referendum shouldn't be to difficult I guess. But we'll still have to see how this turns out.Galad said:I wouldn't be worried for this for too long. Switzerland is known for its frequent referendums, so with an appropriate amount of negative response to that and one or two of these I'm sure a compromise solution would be reached.
Anyway the "Restrict sale to minors" motion passed with a crushing 27 to 1 votes in favor or something along those lines and the "ban violent games" motion has a more even 19 vs 12 in favor of it.
So it looks like a ban isn't the most probable outcome.
Wait & See
Nuke_em_05 said:...FiveSpeedf150 said:...
It seems that they (as a nation) have decided that they don't want it in their country.
Maybe it is just something that they don't want in their society? Because they don't see a need or point to it?
KillerMidget said:Don't they have some form of direct democracy? If that's true, wouldn't that also imply that Swiss citizens have been given a say in this?
To all of the above, Allow me to state that the people had no say in these motions, I still don't have a total grasp on Politics here but I'm pretty sure that IF they want to implant this law in the constitution, It will have to come down to popular vote.KillerMidget said:And that gives me the clawing and incorrigible impression that people there are boring, no matter what might be the contrary.
Not exactly no, the recently instated a choice where we could either do the military service, or do the civil service which is longer but more flexible, many people opt for that now, so many in fact that they are considering removing the choice. (earlier we could only do the civil service after writing a letter of conflict in conscience and a psych evaluation)Nuke_em_05 said:Essentially every male over 21 in their country is an active (and armed) reservist... if that helps.