I don't think the situation was supposed to be as ambiguous as you described it, at least in Season 1 - Kirito's violence and anger, when it was showed, was showed in a positive light, or, at least not a negative one (the whole "Beater" speech, his offing of Kuradeel, his duel with Kayaba come to mind.) Granted, this was changed with Season 2, with Kirito acknowledging the Lauging Coffin excursion, and even questioning his own right to be this hero. It was an interesting direction to take. I actually really liked the beginning of Season 2, and not only because of the layout of GGO, which is why this feels so much like a throwback to me.mlbslugger06 said:I think it could be said that Kirito attacked Sugou and Sinon's friend for himself because his anger would be satisfied after doing so or because he wanted to see those men in pain. I never felt the writer's were making his actions out to be heroic. Kirito, despite his thoughtful, caring demeanor, has some real anger and he seems to always see his grudges out to the end. Asuna, Sinon, Klein and the others see him as a hero because he saves them and appears to act entirely out of loyalty to his friends. Is that the truth behind his actions? I don't know.
On this, we pretty much agree. I don't think having the hero saving a character from a threat of rape is inherently wrong, it's the execution that I find terrible. (nevermind the fact that two times is NOT the charm.) GGO has shown iteslf to be more self-aware than ALO, so there's still hope for the next episode, but I'd hate to see it having no consequence other that Sinon's eternal gratefulness to Kirito becoming her dominant trait, when the series spent so much time making her into a somewhat developed character)mlbslugger06 said:Back to rape though.
Do writers need to create better characters so that their identities aren't reliant on the same type of events and situations? Yes.
That being said, is it wrong for a would-be victim of rape, who has tried but cannot escape on his/her own, to be saved by a character who is meant to be portrayed as a hero? No.
Does saving a person from sexual assault make you a hero? To most people, not all.
Does it earn you the gratitude, respect or admiration of the would-be victim? Most likely.
Is gratitude, respect or admiration the same as being considered a hero? Not at all.
So, because most people enjoy Hero-Building 101, (which they do, you're right about that) we should ignore the reasons why we individually don't, and accept a poorly pieced-together rape scenario as being fictional necessity? I understand your reasoning, but, as a person, I cannot agree with that last part.mlbslugger06 said:Can that action reinforce his identity as a hero? If you are aiming at the "most people" demographic.
Can a character's reputation of hero allow him to do morally ambiguous things hoping the audience will let them slide in his case? Absolutely, that is human psychology 101.
If you dislike Kirito's actions being excused just because he saved Asuna or Sinon, get over it. People let those things slide because they think heroes "earn" that right.
Of course, that's ultimately not a big deal, it's just a shonen series that had a shot at popularity, but just because most people like something doesn't necessarily make that thing good.