A bit late, but...
And this really doesn't fall under the umbrella problem of Net Neutrality. It would be a problem if it was taking away from other services, or otherwise took something away from a competing service. Like if Microsoft payed to have Bing traffic sped up. Pokemon Go is in no direct competition with anyone. I'm struggling to think of how a data exemption for Pokemon Go is competitive to any other service.
There's a fundamental difference between actively spying on your data, and special routing. Which isn't to say T-Mobile isn't spying on you, only that it's not really necessary.Denamic said:This is as bad as throttling down bandwidth for certain applications or websites. Worse even, because it tricks consumers into thinking it's a good thing.
This is bad in several levels. For one, it means your internet usage is being spied on and analysed. Secondly, it's anti-competitive, because it provides a special advantage to only one product over others. It's like making your car insurance free, but only if your car is a toyota.
Don't support this shit.
And this really doesn't fall under the umbrella problem of Net Neutrality. It would be a problem if it was taking away from other services, or otherwise took something away from a competing service. Like if Microsoft payed to have Bing traffic sped up. Pokemon Go is in no direct competition with anyone. I'm struggling to think of how a data exemption for Pokemon Go is competitive to any other service.