Yes it is. Lots of their experiments are flawed or applied in stupid ways, which is a shame considering the work and resources they put into them. Their explanation and reasoning are not only dumbed-down but usually very inaccurate as well. Good examples are when they tried to make hammers more brittle by "case hardening," only proving that they have no idea how that's even done, or when they tried to simulate two bullets colliding in mid air by holding one stationary and shooting the other at it at HALF velocity instead of DOUBLE.Diamondback One said:The show is not crap, and they prove a lot more than you'd probably ever do in your entire life, bud. So chill out.
Yes you could, but a regular lens that big would be a hell of a lot heavier and harder to make than a parabolic mirror. A Fresnel lens would be better.BrownGaijin said:Um... Couldn't you do the same thing with a magnifying glass?
No if it killed him he would make a typical villain... learning safety would make him a very good(erm-evil?) villain.mad825 said:not really, all they disproved was the fable of Archimedes burning the Roman invasion fleet with mirrors.Agayek said:Didn't the Mythbusters prove this was impossible?
Still, this guy really needs to learn about safety. He would make a poor villain if it killed him.
It would be quite practical, using modern technology, to have the mirrors adjust themselves according to the position of the sun and the target. The reason why it isn't used as a weapon is that guns and missiles are just so much better. It would be huge, would need a line of sight, and would take quite a while to destroy armoured targets. It would almost always get destroyed by it's target before it destroyed it's target.Darkauthor81 said:Why this can't be used as a weapon is because if you move a foot in any direction you move out of the rig's focus.
Impossible? No. But ineffectual as a weapon? Yes.Agayek said:Didn't the Mythbusters prove this was impossible?
They're methods were so poor that it didn't prove much of anything. However, you would need a bigger dish than this, and the video is obviously faked.Agayek said:Didn't the Mythbusters prove this was impossible?
Yeah but when he meets girls he can tell them the story about how he lost his finger to a deathray. Score instant cool points.luvd1 said:That boy's got balls. Using pliers to hold the rock. One slip and that's his fingers gone.
That was using Archimedes' theoretical laser death ray. Archimedes didn't have the technology available to focus quite that much light to a single point - also, he was using lenses rather than mirrors.Baron Von Evil Satan said:I thought they did too. It looks like they need Death Ray building lessons.Agayek said:Didn't the Mythbusters prove this was impossible?
Mythbusters rarely "proves" anything.Agayek said:Didn't the Mythbusters prove this was impossible?