Hammeroj said:Well, they do all get their 'moral' teachings from the same books. The fact that followers of islam in general are more violent and intolerant than the followers of christianity, for instance, speaks volumes for the reason of xenophobia towards muslims.Killerowl said:Yes, it is. But that was not my point.Hammeroj said:An extremist muslim is still a muslim. So, if a muslim extremist group did this, the people saying "muslims did it" are, in fact, factually correct.Killerowl said:Something I don't like about this is all the people jumping on the "muslims did it" bandwagon.
Just check the comments on the youtube video and see what I mean.
Yes, this was probably done by an EXTREMIST muslim group. Don't judge all of them because what very few of them does.
It pisses me off!
I don't like that they try to put all muslims in the same group!
Racism is just going to get worse in this country after this.
Look at me, railing on muslims like that. If I say much more, I'm likely to get warned, so enough about them.
And that's exactly why what I said is a jab at the idiotic airport security in the US.Vampire cat said:It's not like they flew to the building... As long as they do a proper job in the aftermath. We don't even know if the attackers ARE from outside, and most terrorist attacks are by people well integrated into the society of the country in question.
You don't need a reason better than "it's a developed western democratic country".lacktheknack said:I'm not asking for a justification... but the terrorists wouldn't attack, say, Zimbabwe, because there wouldn't be a point. They only sacrifice themselves for a cause, after all.
I'm just asking "for what cause?" They aren't entirely irrational, they DO follow some form of logic. They don't go blowing themselves up for fun.
I don't think anyone blew up here, but those that do, do in fact do it for fun. An eternity of bliss, so I'm told.
'Christian Peacefulness' and 'Muslim Violence' represent a false dichotomy. Remove the religious modifiers and we have two ends of a spectrum that is universal.Killerowl said:It's funny that you say that because throughout history, christianity has been a very violent religion. The Crusades, I'm looking at you.Hammeroj said:Well, they do all get their 'moral' teachings from the same books. The fact that followers of islam in general are more violent and intolerant than the followers of christianity, for instance, speaks volumes for the reason of xenophobia towards muslims.Killerowl said:Yes, it is. But that was not my point.Hammeroj said:An extremist muslim is still a muslim. So, if a muslim extremist group did this, the people saying "muslims did it" are, in fact, factually correct.Killerowl said:Something I don't like about this is all the people jumping on the "muslims did it" bandwagon.
Just check the comments on the youtube video and see what I mean.
Yes, this was probably done by an EXTREMIST muslim group. Don't judge all of them because what very few of them does.
It pisses me off!
I don't like that they try to put all muslims in the same group!
Racism is just going to get worse in this country after this.
Look at me, railing on muslims like that. If I say much more, I'm likely to get warned, so enough about them.
And the Bible is full of bad morals, and so is the Quran, mainly because they both are old outdated books. But both books also contain good morals.
And christians being more tolerant and less violent; there's no truth in that, unless you can show me proof. Don't try to blame all the muslims for what very few of them does.
Christianity is centred on the 1st World and as such has inherited the sociopolitical aspects of that world - stability, personal freedom, excess, etc.
Islam is centred on the 3rd and 2nd Worlds and thus inherits their instability, corruption, poverty and sociopolitical turmoil.
Religion is a product of society and thus it only reflects it, not forms it. When a culture changes, so too does its religiosity, as with all its other systems.
The same atrocities that Isalmaphobes equate directly with Islamic faith, were perpetrated in the Sri Lankan the civil war, yet 70% of the population are Buddhist. 8% are Muslim. The rest are Hindu and Christian. In terms of the Tamil people (the other side of the war), 88% Hindu, and 5.5% are Muslim and rest are Christian. Yet, Buddhists and Hindus are seen as pacifists.
Incongruous to logic then, that they would commit such atrocities as car and suicide bombings, rape, beheadings and torture.
In Africa, some Christians also commit terrible crimes, of torture, misogynistic abuse. Incidentally, in the affluent West, 'good Christians' oppress the poor by legislating their health care away and moving their jobs overseas to Hindu and Buddhist nations. They also advocate 'enhanced interrogation techniques' and go to church the next day.
Religion is entirely a correlative factor. Sociopolitical, economic and resource factors are the true contributors.