The 40 Year Old Virgin Who Knocked Up Sarah Marshall and Felt Superbad About It....*throws up*

Recommended Videos

Enigmers

New member
Dec 14, 2008
1,745
0
0
I thought that Seth Rogen movies were bad enough to begin with and didn't need to be parodied. I guess someone out there disagrees with me.
 

SUPA FRANKY

New member
Aug 18, 2009
1,889
0
0
I ONLY laughed at the virgin part and the " That's some nasty shit!" Part. AFter that, just...no...
 

Sion_Barzahd

New member
Jul 2, 2008
1,384
0
0
Well that was truely fucked up. I'm off to go get seriously drunk now, perhaps the alcohol can get the memory of that trailer out.

Also if you want to see clips of a film as fucked up if not worse than that one, go to youtube my friends and search for a film called

"Don't be a menace to south central while drinking your juice."

yes the film is as stupid as it's title and is devoted to ripping off black sterotypes.
 

axelspitfire

New member
Jun 21, 2009
55
0
0
I did feel like laughing AT the trailer for how crap it was, but... what the hell did i just watch! it looks so bad, and cheaply made. I do hope thats a parody of parody making!
 

Balaxe

New member
Mar 24, 2009
502
0
0
Fox242 said:
My faith in humanity just dropped by 45%.
The fact that you still have faith in humanity is amazing, this made me lose complete faith in humanity for the 6th time this year.
 

RyVal

New member
May 19, 2009
156
0
0
See, I thought it was an alright trailer...until I realised that it was advertising a genuine film.
 

Jzolr0708

New member
Apr 6, 2009
312
0
0
Normally, Im fairly ok with this parodies. Not love em, but not bash em.

That.Was.The.Worst.Trailer.Ever.

See, making comedy about serious things, such as the original scary movie, is hilarious. Making funny things about funny things cancels out all hilarity. That, and the whole parody thing has been overdone. That, and the director must be the stupidest person in the universe.


Love of god, I liked the crappy pre mission WC3 intros more than this. Yeah they were pixelated, but atleast they were the tiniest bit INTERESTING!
 

RyVal

New member
May 19, 2009
156
0
0
I've just realised that director Craig Moss was also responsible for "Saving Ryan's Privates".

It all makes sense now.
 

Ghadente

White Rabbit
Mar 21, 2009
537
0
0
This movie is an abomination of film.

a spoof movie mocking comedies... just doesn't make sense.

the only part of that i remotely chuckled at was the end, "can you hear me now" guy.

Who would think this is a good movie? all the actors, the producer and the directer should all be fired and barred from the film industry for life.

just plain old NOT FUNNY
 

Infallible Fail

New member
Sep 10, 2009
46
0
0
i think i laughed like four times, OBVIOUSLY if you didn't appreciate the original movies then you aren't going to appreciate these kind, but come on. "That's some nasty shit, MA!!!"
good stuff ;)
 

Hamster at Dawn

It's Hazard Time!
Mar 19, 2008
1,650
0
0
Wtf? You can't make a parody of comedy movies. This isn't even a good attempt, it's just copying the jokes from those movies and throwing in a load of lame pop culture references. They haven't even bothered to come up with a half decent title. I envy third world countries because they will never be subjected to this horrific trash.
 

Snowalker

New member
Nov 8, 2008
1,937
0
0
Wait the superbad like movies, I.E. the ones being paraody are not parodies? I could have sworn they were... wow.
 

Shoggoth2588

New member
Aug 31, 2009
10,250
0
0
Not bad for a fan-made trailer ... the only thing is, the fat kid from Superbad should have been spewing [literally spewing] dick/cock jokes. Otherwise, it was really convincing.

I know Hollywood hasn't sunk low enough to actually be making a movie this bad
 

Gladion

New member
Jan 19, 2009
1,470
0
0
TheTygerfire said:
In fact, let's make this trailer a stupid test. The more times you laugh, the stupider you are.
I didn't laugh at all, so try to match the score!
I always thought every person had a different taste. Thank you for teaching me that humour is actually based on intelligence.

Look, I, for myself, love hilariously bad jokes - preferrably so bad I feel pain. The ones in the trailer weren't this bad (unfortunately), but at least they made me grin. That does not mean I am dumber than you. Please accept this fact.

Of course, there are jokes you only get if you feature a certain point of smartness (is that even an existing word?), but that does not mean you cannot rejoice in stupid ones.

Also, I'm not saying that "it's okay to be stupid" or just go for cheap laughs (I often catch myself facepalming at myself for laughing at stupid jokes).

PS: I don't know why I put so much effort into this post. You were probably just joking anyways.
 

ohgodalex

New member
May 21, 2009
1,094
0
0
Jesus fucking Christ.
Not only am I angry that these people have more money than I am, I'm angry at them for taking jokes and inserting them into their movie wherever the fuck they feel like it, as though their movie was the pincushion to the needles of pop cultures references.

I love the Dos Equis guy, but now those commercials will forever be ruined for me, because some asshole decided that pandering to slobbering idiots was more important than integrity.
 

lwm3398

New member
Apr 15, 2009
2,896
0
0
Laughed twice, once at the "That is some NASTY SHIT!" and the next time at the "Dude, if those are your nipples, I'm gonna pass out." But I will never see this. It looks, er, to put it lightly, FUCKING RETARDED.

And that's lightly.
 

Gildan Bladeborn

New member
Aug 11, 2009
3,044
0
0
xDarc said:
Gildan Bladeborn said:
...you've created the cinematic equivalent of all the idiots who were running around saying "I'm Rick James, *****!" when they are A) Not Chappelle and B) Not funny, because they are not bloody Chappelle [http://www.thebestpageintheuniverse.net/c.cgi?u=chappelle].
I already said as much. It's regurgitation. People have been doing it for years. Mel Brooks has done it. The Zuckermans have done it. Tons of people are constantly repackaging and retelling jokes they saw or heard somewhere else. People still do it, because it's still funny, cheap as it may be. Get over it.
I can't, because the difference between a Mel Brooks repackaging of a joke and the Epic Movie variety is quite staggering really - it's the difference between watching a skilled comedian re-use a joke from another comedian and watching a parrot imitate a joke it overheard a comedian tell. The first is a competent new spin on something familiar, the second is unfeeling repetition because the parrot does not understand the concept of humor and is simply repeating what somebody laughed at before, but quite badly because it's a bloody parrot - they don't have a sense of humor, let alone the knack for proper comedic timing!.

Laughing with your friends when they stupidly repeat pop-culture catch phrases is, despite Maddox's overblown rhetoric, not really a big deal. Making feature films where the actors do nothing but clumsily repeat pop-culture catch phrases? Please don't ever do this - some things just aren't worth doing no matter how much money you could make from it.

Nobody in their right minds should be defending these films - they are objectively terrible in every way. Telling us that they made a lot of money only proves that a sizeable portion of the population will pay money to watch terrible things - popularity is not an indicator of quality! If the internet hasn't taught you that there is a market for just about anything, no matter how horrible, disgusting, incomprehensible, or stupid it might be, then you have not been paying attention.

We're not film snobs assaulting the notion of stupid parody comedies because they violate our artistic principles, we're (rightly) complaining about the recent trend of terrible parody movies because they are terrible, not because they are parody movies - I challenge anyone to watch Scary Movie 3 and then tell me that say... 2001: A Space Travesty [http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0157262/] is equally funny (or funny at all really). Both films are parodies, both use many of the same comedic devices, and they both have Leslie Nielson in them, but the second one is staggeringly awful and almost completely devoid of genuine humor.

If you can watch A Space Travesty and be laughing throughout, then I submit you will pretty much laugh at anything because everyone with a functional sense of humor will be wondering why the hell they are watching that terrible terrible film before 10 minutes are up. The same holds true for Epic/Disaster/Etc Movie films (the only funny ones were (some) of the Scary Movie ones). Those films are unfunny abominations, the places where humor goes to die. If you think they are hilarious, then your sense of humor is broken and you're part of the reason Hollywood keeps inflicting those... things on a world that has done nothing to deserve them, for which you should really be ashamed.
 

Caligulove

New member
Sep 25, 2008
3,029
0
0
theyre not even trying! honestly! theres no writing in this shit

and since when has the Verizon guy been funny? thats an incredibly dated joke- they dont even have that guy say anything anymore.