The 9001st Halo 3: ODST Review

Recommended Videos

skywalkerlion

New member
Jun 21, 2009
1,259
0
0
Hello. I recently played through Bungie's most recent game in the Halo Franchise, also known as Halo 3: ODST. This is my first review and Ima break this up into a few topics, which is pretty unoriginal but it does the job :D

BASIC OVERVIEW

ODST takes place in a city known as New Mombassa, which is basically the pinnacle of civilization in 2552, the year the game take's place. The game is ALSO taking place right in between the games Halo 2 and 3. The game is supposed to be centered mostly around stealthy tactical and small co ordinated strikes, unlike the games in which you play the Spartan Master Chief, in games Halo 1-3. The game introduces a new campaign in which most of it consists of finding small objects that initiate flashbacks, which lets you play another fellow ODST after your team is scattered throughout the wasted city. It also features 3 new multiplayer maps, a new mode called 'Firefight', and a disc that contains all of the previous map packs of all the Halo games.

STORY PROGRESSION: 6/10

Personally, I think giving this a six is pushing it a little far, because normally the flashbacks are very unrelated to eachother and sometimes it has me wondering when and where the events are taking place, and how they are all connected. Most of the characters are pretty damn annoying, especially Buck, the douche that
gets the weird 40 year old looking 20 something year old chick.
But, it didn't really suck too much to rate it down any farther.

GAMEPLAY: 5/10

A 5 goes for this one. I thought the game was pretty fun at parts but sometimes it got waayyy too tedious. Like trying to find the objects that trigger the flashbacks. It got really stupid walking around and running into brute patrols and stuff, it just feels really repetitive most of the time, and the only level that offers any diversity is when you fly the banshees around the Phantom, which is somehow controlled by the good guys -.-

However, in co-op when you have a guy you can tell how to plan out your attacks so you don't stand there shooting shielded brutes for 10 seconds while being blown to pieces, it get's alot better, and much more rewarding.

FEATURES: 4/10

Firefight is a pretty good addition, I'll give it that, but it was basically a copy paste of the campaign mixed with GoW Horde Mode, however instead of rounds it has nothing but non stop bombardment of troops (I think, I ragequit after dying like 10 times XD). The reason I rate this so low is mostly because, it's the campaign mode..except it's on the same map over and over..and it's longer. I didn't like it too much and find Horde mode much better, but I'd be called a fanboi for that, but believe me, I hated GoW ;) I overall didn't find it that great.

It also comes with the second disk which gives you the entire halo 3 multiplayer experience. It looks good on paper, but let's think about this..

1. Anyone who buys ODST almost positively has Halo 3 anyway

2. You're basically paying 60$ for a campaign worth about 20, and Halo 3 multiplayer, worth about maybe 20 more, mostly because both suck.

And the last feature are the 3 new maps which I haven't tested. They look pretty cluttered, and don't seem very good to play a game on IMO.

FINAL IMPRESSIONS

This game made me lose faith, and love, for the ODSTs whom I used to cherish. Since I played it for 5 hours straight with a buddy of mine, not to say it was long, I think it shoulda ended about 3 levels sooner. Cos hearing 'IT'S A PATROL! :O' over and over again makes my ears bleed ;(



~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

OVERALL: 3/5 ***

I suggest renting the game, but 60 dollars is overkill, and you should really save it for MW2 which I can almost guarantee will be better :p


Thanks for reading, tell me how you like it! :D
 

GreyWolf257

New member
Oct 1, 2009
1,379
0
0
Good review, but I think firefight would probably bring the game up to a 4. The new maps aren't that great, but the big, sand covered one has three different levels that you can play on, so I guess that helps some.
 

oliveira8

New member
Feb 2, 2009
4,726
0
0
Could have been much longer and in depth, instead of giving a number and give a half explanation of why it got such number.

Develop the points much more, and just don't mention 3 parts of the game. Sound, voice acting, graphics, flow of the game, everything that makes up for the game, no need to give 500 words for each part. Review the game as a whole, not just sections of it.

And finally get rid of the scores. They tacky.
 

skywalkerlion

New member
Jun 21, 2009
1,259
0
0
oliveira8 said:
Could have been much longer and in depth, instead of giving a number and give a half explanation of why it got such number.

Develop the points much more, and just don't mention 3 parts of the game. Sound, voice acting, graphics, flow of the game, everything that makes up for the game, no need to give 500 words for each part. Review the game as a whole, not just sections of it.

And finally get rid of the scores. They tacky.
Thank you a bunch for giving me some critical and constructive criticism, it's much appreciated :D
 

The Rockerfly

New member
Dec 31, 2008
4,649
0
0
Really? A 3 out of 10
I know the campaign is short but you are paying for a few hours of campaign, firefight, 3 maps and personally the campaign was brilliantly action packed
The story was awful I will admit but it's a perfectly functional game

Surely a 3 is deserved for a game which is unfinished and bug filled. While I will admit it was short and a bit expensive, it's not deserving of a 3
 

skywalkerlion

New member
Jun 21, 2009
1,259
0
0
The Rockerfly said:
Really? A 3 out of 10
I know the campaign is short but you are paying for a few hours of campaign, firefight, 3 maps and personally the campaign was brilliantly action packed
The story was awful I will admit but it's a perfectly functional game

Surely a 3 is deserved for a game which is unfinished and bug filled. While I will admit it was short and a bit expensive, it's not deserving of a 3
Shoulda evaluated. 3/5 stars.

And Cubikill, I don't play it anymore, and I was reviewing, not trying to bash the game at all. Just stating my opinions on it. It would be different if I went off like 'THIS GAME IS SUCK, SCREW HALO!' but I tried to be more civilized than that.
 

happysock

New member
Jul 26, 2009
2,565
0
0
skywalkerlion said:
It got really stupid walking around and running into brute patrols and stuff, it just feels really repetitive most of the time, and the only level that offers any diversity is when you fly the banshees around the Phantom, which is somehow controlled by the good guys -.-

you should really save it for MW2 which I can almost guarantee will be better :p

Thanks for reading, tell me how you like it! :D
A few criticisms, it didn't seem to me like you actually played the game through as you seem to be getting the story all mixed up, either that or you skipped through the cut scenes or just couldn't be bothered to follow it.

You seem to be a cod fanboy in which it is pretty obvious you are not going to enjoy the game which has been found with a lot of others on this site, namely one who likes to come back and get banned alot.

Your maths don't add up either you scored it a 6 then a 5 then a 4 which gives it a 3 :S unless you mean 3 out of 5 which is a bit retarded because your mixing up the numbers (just read post number 8 in which case ignore that bit)

And finally firefight, you made it clear that your not the best at it, but try playing it with a friend on normal or something and you'll find it challenging but not overly hard untill the later levels, it just came off as I can't do it so i'll rate it low

Anyhow hope these comments help, the review itself is pretty good it's pretty basic but you covered everything that needs covering and it was to the point which was nice.
 

skywalkerlion

New member
Jun 21, 2009
1,259
0
0
happysock said:
skywalkerlion said:
It got really stupid walking around and running into brute patrols and stuff, it just feels really repetitive most of the time, and the only level that offers any diversity is when you fly the banshees around the Phantom, which is somehow controlled by the good guys -.-

you should really save it for MW2 which I can almost guarantee will be better :p

Thanks for reading, tell me how you like it! :D
A few criticisms, it didn't seem to me like you actually played the game through as you seem to be getting the story all mixed up, either that or you skipped through the cut scenes or just couldn't be bothered to follow it.

You seem to be a cod fanboy in which it is pretty obvious you are not going to enjoy the game which has been found with a lot of others on this site, namely one who likes to come back and get banned alot.

Your maths don't add up either you scored it a 6 then a 5 then a 4 which gives it a 3 :S unless you mean 3 out of 5 which is a bit retarded because your mixing up the numbers (just read post number 8 in which case ignore that bit)

And finally firefight, you made it clear that your not the best at it, but try playing it with a friend on normal or something and you'll find it challenging but not overly hard untill the later levels, it just came off as I can't do it so i'll rate it low

Anyhow hope these comments help, the review itself is pretty good it's pretty basic but you covered everything that needs covering and it was to the point which was nice.
I am not a CoD fanboy, at all. I love the series, but classifying me as a fanboi is pretty..rude.

And yeah, sometimes I didn't really get the story all that much (I finished it at 4 in the morning :p) And I thought I would love ODST, but I was disapointed.

And:

That was fairly factual indeed.
Would you call me retarded if I asked you if you were being serious? :)?
 

Jinmasa 8

New member
May 29, 2009
60
0
0
very good review. i agree with you for most of your points but here's the thing the extra disc is acctuly worth more then the game becuse the map packs are $15 for each one and there is 4 of them so effectively your getting ODST for free, but the fact that i bought all the map packs when they came out makes me mad that i just got all of them again.

but becuse people need clear numbers 4/5 IMO
 

The Rockerfly

New member
Dec 31, 2008
4,649
0
0
skywalkerlion said:
The Rockerfly said:
Really? A 3 out of 10
I know the campaign is short but you are paying for a few hours of campaign, firefight, 3 maps and personally the campaign was brilliantly action packed
The story was awful I will admit but it's a perfectly functional game

Surely a 3 is deserved for a game which is unfinished and bug filled. While I will admit it was short and a bit expensive, it's not deserving of a 3
Shoulda evaluated. 3/5 stars.

And Cubikill, I don't play it anymore, and I was reviewing, not trying to bash the game at all. Just stating my opinions on it. It would be different if I went off like 'THIS GAME IS SUCK, SCREW HALO!' but I tried to be more civilized than that.
Oops sorry. I agree for the price I think it's worth 3/5 and while I don't agree with you on the gameplay (because I love the engine) I respect your opinion and at least you explained yourself. Although it could have been a bit long and more in depth, just a word for the future
 

FriendlyPossum

New member
Oct 8, 2009
22
0
0
I have never liked halo. I find it bland and overrated, ppl only liked it because it was xboxs own franchise. But every game is exactly the same....kill some covenant, then kill some flood for the rest of the game.

I was hyped for odst because it sounded like it could be different but the reality is its boring and the servers are fucked.

dont buy this game
 
Jun 8, 2009
229
0
0
Pretty good review. I do agree that firefight wasn't all that great, and I think it could have been improved by doing it on different maps, instead of the campaign levels.
 

ohgodalex

New member
May 21, 2009
1,094
0
0
FriendlyPossum said:
I have never liked halo. I find it bland and overrated, ppl only liked it because it was xboxs own franchise. But every game is exactly the same....kill some covenant, then kill some flood for the rest of the game.

I was hyped for odst because it sounded like it could be different but the reality is its boring and the servers are fucked.

dont buy this game
There are, ah, no servers. Just throwing that out there.

Your review could use some extra thought. You switch ratings systems before giving the game as a whole a grade, which was a bit confusing. Additionally, I'd advise against numeric ratings in general, unless you can give an example of games on either end of the spectrum (I.E. "Halo is a 3/5, with a 1/5 game being Haze and a 5/5 game being Mass Effect). It also seems as though you didn't try very hard to understand the cutscenes, as I didn't find them disjointed or confusing in the least, despite playing them out of order my first time through.
I would avoid evaluating the difficulty of the game, because, from your description of Firefight, it sounds like you're just not so amazing at Halo, and therefore dislike the gameplay.

Other than that, it sounded like a fair evaluation of Halo.