yeah it,s a bit of a double standard I bet if it was the dad alien reacting to that about Hannah Montana the ad wouldn't have passed.
No, I'd prefer to deal with the double standard from the other end - have grown women who fantasize about under 18 boys called perverted and creepy as well.AugustFall said:Vegosiux said:Yes, men are also called bastards and perverts for it.bdcjacko said:Why can't women have fantasies of 18 year old boys? They are of concenting age here in the states. Men do the same thing.
So do you want to fantasize under 18 girls without people calling you a pervert? I know you don't but I just wanted you to hear that.
It's a double standard, they exist. This is not a bad one. Men who fantasize about girls under 18 are perverts.
Britney's target demographic was never middle-aged men, or even males at all, at least not in her early days. (That's not to say males never appreciated her costumes, but you seldom saw them queueing up to buy her CDs). I'm pretty sure the sexual content here is more a "self-empowerment, statement of maturity and womanhood" kind of thing - in much the same way that male comic-book superheroes have rippling muscles not for the benefit of female readers, but as an aspirational wish-fulfilment image for the male readership.DracoSuave said:I mean, we'd [sarcasm]never sexualize under age girls in popular culture [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C-u5WLJ9Yk4&feature=relmfu] now would we?[/sarcasm]
Yes, because nothing says 'Healthy teenage girl sexual empowerment' more than 'tarted up sexy school girl imagery.'Batou667 said:Britney's target demographic was never middle-aged men, or even males at all, at least not in her early days. (That's not to say males never appreciated her costumes, but you seldom saw them queueing up to buy her CDs). I'm pretty sure the sexual content here is more a "self-empowerment, statement of maturity and womanhood" kind of thing - in much the same way that male comic-book superheroes have rippling muscles not for the benefit of female readers, but as an aspirational wish-fulfilment image for the male readership.DracoSuave said:I mean, we'd [sarcasm]never sexualize under age girls in popular culture [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C-u5WLJ9Yk4&feature=relmfu] now would we?[/sarcasm]
It neither makes logical sense, nor should it be the case, but sadly it's true. Hence the success of Barbie, Bratz Dolls, and the fact that British schoolgirls are more likely to aspire to be a singer, actress or model rather than a doctor or politician. Hell, I'm pretty sure some survey found that young girl's most commonly identified role model is Katie Price (I'm not sure if she's achieved cross-Atlantic penetration (but I wouldn't put any kind of penetration past her, the massive slut) but about five seconds in Google Image Search should tell you everything you need to know about her - and then some, if you have Safesearch off).DracoSuave said:Yes, because nothing says 'Healthy teenage girl sexual empowerment' more than 'tarted up sexy school girl imagery.'
Oh no, it's extremely common. That's my point... a lot of teenage sexual 'empowerment' isn't to pander to teenage males but the older adults who market it.Batou667 said:tl;dr: It's not wholesome, but it's more common than you think.