The art of reading Books

Recommended Videos

The 5th Hour

New member
Oct 2, 2010
12
0
0
Gudday-

Change is the order of nature, and culture is no exception to the rule; yet it saddens me that books have found themselves replaced in our world of gadgets and games. Games can do things that books never could, they can provide us with powerful forms of interactive entertainment and allow us to explore entire new universes from our own perspective. But we aren't here to talk about games, we need to discover the place of the humble paperback novel (or in some cases the e-book) in our new world of tangible un-realities.

In my opinion books are just as interactive as any game - except a book requires you to indulge the imagination in order to visualise the story. You might say that that games are to books what contemporary movies are to black and white stop motion cinema. Nowadays books just don't compare to the stunning visuals and audio that games can provide, and the effort we need to put in to start up our imagination we would much rather just put into playing a game.

So when a picture says a thousand words, where does that leave books?

Well for starters book are the link to our past in the same sense that we need them in order to relate to the way we are now. For example, Crime and Punishment by Fyodor D is a stunning psychological crime thriller that is a direct reflection of the state of St Petersburg at the time. Without the books of that era all we have are facts and histories, but through the books we can live the time and place. Games can try but they came from our society, any historical comment by a game can only be authentic as a retrospective view of those events or places.

Can I just say - I've read The Divine Comedy: Inferno by Dante and I was not amused at the crude interpretation into the game Dante. If you're going to develop a game influenced by a book at least do it in the spirit the book was written in (so to speak).

Today however books must compete with interactive and visual media for a place in our future. And it seems as though fewer people care to pick up a book and indulge their imaginations in worlds painted by words alone. I sometimes fear that book are becoming a niche culture, reserved only for those who are hardcore enough to concentrate past the opening paragraph where books should be openly enjoyed by everyone. Maybe the art of reading books is being lost...

The art of reading is like the art of gaming - no one is good at first. But is is easy to see why some people get frustrated at reading because it is deceptively hard; I mean what could be easier than reading words off a page? Well in the world of reading nothing is given, everything is there to be interpreted by the reader and the best experience is founds by delving for the meanings behind the words (yes I know this all reminds you of studying Shakespeare in school). But that is all just fun, the really hard part is slowing down your mind to the pace of reading.

We live in a world where information comes thick and fast, and by fast I mean break-neck speed. In order to read a book we need to be able to divorce ourselves from this, stop, and smell the roses offered by the books. And this, in my opinion is the way of the future; it's why we need books in our lives.

Games are great, but no one want to sit around for hours playing a slow paced game with no excitement. Books here do something that games can't do, they provide us with a way to be entertained as a pace that just requires a little relaxation. It's the meditation of the future, it allows us to step outside our busy lives and take some time to exercise our imagination and flush out all that unnecessary information that plagues us for most waking hours.


But I think now I've written far too much and you've all probably gotten bored with me. But for those of you who love the art of reading, I hope I've given you some food for thought.

-Sam
 

BonsaiK

Music Industry Corporate Whore
Nov 14, 2007
5,635
0
0
What's the point of this post - that books are good? If so, you're probably correct, but my response would be "well, okay... and...?"

Remember that when books first appeared as popular mass-market items they were vilified as damaging new media, and many people complained that they would take away the public's imagination, ability to think freely, and ability to remember. Sounds familiar, hey.
 

Dark Knifer

New member
May 12, 2009
4,468
0
0
Reading is still pretty popular. The problem is you can't really use reading as a social form of entertainment like you can with a movie or game. Reading is something that people have to do on their own, and people tend not to like this. I doubt it would die out though, atleast not for a while.

Also, welcome to the escapist. Enjoy the laughs and don't go to the basement.
 

Lullabye

New member
Oct 23, 2008
4,425
0
0
Lots of assumptions made here.

Simply put, I say Dungeons and Dragons is perhaps the most imaginative, and interactive story telling experience I will ever have.

Games are great.
Books are great.
Neither have anything to do with each other.
Comparing the two is pointless and will only start a pointless flame war

Can I not enjoy the non-interactive, imaginary based experience that literature gives, just as much as the interactive, visually laid out experience games offer?
I love both, and both have much to offer in terms of entertainment and artistic worth.

-my two cents
 

The 5th Hour

New member
Oct 2, 2010
12
0
0
Lullabye said:
Lots of assumptions made here.

Simply put, I say Dungeons and Dragons is perhaps the most imaginative, and interactive story telling experience I will ever have.

Games are great.
Books are great.
Neither have anything to do with each other.
Comparing the two is pointless and will only start a pointless flame war
I've never played D&D but it's definitely on my to-do list simply because it looks like a game that requires such an immersion of imagination.

I'm sorry I tried not to compare games and books in the sense that one is/isn't better than other other. I just wanted to point out that books have a different role now that we have different forms of media and entertainment.
 

Lullabye

New member
Oct 23, 2008
4,425
0
0
The 5th Hour said:
Lullabye said:
Lots of assumptions made here.

Simply put, I say Dungeons and Dragons is perhaps the most imaginative, and interactive story telling experience I will ever have.

Games are great.
Books are great.
Neither have anything to do with each other.
Comparing the two is pointless and will only start a pointless flame war
I've never played D&D but it's definitely on my to-do list simply because it looks like a game that requires such an immersion of imagination.

I'm sorry I tried not to compare games and books in the sense that one is/isn't better than other other. I just wanted to point out that books have a different role now that we have different forms of media and entertainment.
No, they have the same role as always. to entertain us and/or to inform us. Same as with every other form of communication.
Also, seriously check out D&D. I was very skeptical at first, but once you start, you find it's amazing.
Actually, I think people who read more as opposed to play VG's all teh time are better suited, as you need ot visualize everything all the time. it's all in your head.(plus a hell of a lot of reading anyway. Honestly, days worth of material you need to study just to get started.)
I think what clearly indicated to me that gaming and books were two totally seperate things that can't be compared, was when I played Elder Scrolls IV, Oblivion.
I ended up collecting every book in the game and reading them all.
I spent time(hours worth), in a video game, to read books.
(also, in The Darkness, I watched "To kill a Mocking Bird".)
I think Games have the most potential, in that they can incorporate the other mediums so well. But by no means do they make books obsolete, or change their meaning.
 

Blair Bennett

New member
Jan 25, 2008
595
0
0
As much as I love gaming, literature is a passion of mine. As sad as it is, (and it's probably at least moderately inaccurate), but I'm probably one of only the handful of people in my age group who even know who wrote Crime and Punishment, let alone have read it. It kind of sucks, but we're faced with the fact that literature, and texted entertainment, is on the verge of becoming a dying breed. Also, it's more than a little depressing when you consider that we're almost literally ignoring the very basis of our culture today.

I agree with you when you say that certain games are an absolute affront to the texts that they claim to honor, as was definitely the case with Dante's Inferno. I will admit, I've only ever read the Inferno section, as I'm yet to find copies of either Paradiso or Purgatorio. However, the entire idea of the book was the fact that Dante Alighieri was a meek, and wary poet, not some bloodthirsty titan among men who would cast the damned in twain with nary a bat of the eye. The entire concept of the journey through Hell, in my opinion at least, was the one brave the elements, regardless of how frightening and threatening the denizens of Hell may be.

However, in terms of an engaging, interactive medium of storytelling, people nowadays definitely seem much more attuned to gaming. That's not necessarily a bad thing, provided that people keep an interest in where story telling really got a foothold in the recreational market (though a step after verbally passed knowledge).

Truth be told, I see even less similarity between the two mediums each time I look, and that's not necessarily bad. Theoretically, keeping the two separate keeps one from being overshadowed by the other. I love both, and I love them equally. Like children...like conjoined twins...who are undergoing surgery in order to separate themselves from each other...

Let's just hope that one doesn't get the majority of the liver, and that both can live in cold, unfeeling, but tolerate coexistence.
 

Yoshisummons

New member
Aug 10, 2010
191
0
0
Books were massive(to the people that enjoyed forms of media) in the good 'old days' because that was the only form of media to enjoy. Now we have radios/TV/movies/video games/everything possible on the internet and much more! I think its in fact not in a declining state of popularity but that it merely has competition, and if all the little buggers only take interest in forms of media that does not interact with them then their loss.