Oh really? Britian made the internet, Television, and radar. We have also created that guy who plays House, whoes name I forget.Lonan said:LOL! That's what my dad said when Mitt Romney said the British never created anything the world wants!Patrick Buck said:I'm british. We helped create America.
Yay. More vikings.Naeras said:Norwegian.
Vikings.
Actually a far more harmless gang than most people imagine. They actually only got infamous for being "fierce badass warriors" because they were raiding monasteries and raping everything inside.
I take issue with that.The Tibballs said:One mans terrorist is an others freedom fighter.Helmholtz Watson said:I'm going to catch shit for this, but it could be argued that the past IRA were freedom fighters, not terrorist
Yeeeaaaaaa. We did kinda do that didn't we. Entire countries dedicated to making Tea and all that.Doclector said:Well, I'm english, and we kind of did the whole evil empire thing at one point. Y'know, we took hold of pretty much the entire world. Turned one of the countries into a damn prison, we had that many countries. Think about that, at what point have you reached the megalomaniac level of "Turn entire country into a prison".
Yeah, that's pretty damn awful. Sowwy...
To be honest the Dutch did kick the crap out of the Belgian rebels. The Belgians only succeeded because they ran to the French to get help. And to be honest, sometimes I Belgium never had seperated from the Kingdom of the Netherlands. But then again, I don't think I would like to be a Dutchman.talker said:i can't think of anything terrible the dutch did besides flood half the country during an invasion and not building dams until it was too late. oh and not kicking the crap out of the belgian rebels. \we should have done that
Suggesting that the stolen generation was morally unconscionable is in no way unrealistic. By any measure it was an atrocity, and to simply pass it off as some kind of... inevitability that 'could have been handled better' is pretty short-sighted and revisionist.The Tibballs said:The problem with that thinking is that it's unrealistic. You can't colonise an area and leave the existing culture 100% intact, it just can't be done and those countries that have tried to do so almost always end up with severe oppression from one side or the other or multi-generational civil wars. Both of which I'm sure you will agree would have been worse than what happened here in Australia.
But I will concede that it could've been handled better, but only if we knew then what we know now, hindsight being 20/20 and all that.
We call Osama bin Laden a terrorist, but al-Qaeda supporters call him a freedom fighter. In the end it all comes down to which side of the fence you sit on.Darkmantle said:I take issue with that.The Tibballs said:One mans terrorist is an others freedom fighter.Helmholtz Watson said:I'm going to catch shit for this, but it could be argued that the past IRA were freedom fighters, not terrorist
I think the difference falls in who you target. If you target civilians, you are a terrorist, if you only target military/government assets, you could be considered a freedom fighter.
Surely scalping was introduced by the colonists for bounties.LadyTiamat said:Im American/British but even more interesting on my american side I have some Cherokee lineage.
empires,genocide, nukes and scalping!