Hee hee Nice! Reminds me of playing Marvel Vs. Capcom 3 and then grinding through a couple of more chapters of the Fountainhead! (thanks heaps for that by the way bob, seriously. Tough but good read, and definitely shows me where Ms. Rands head was.)aquaman839 said:Comics are lost to me, I never really go into them past the funny pages of the sunday news.. If it were not for cartoons then I would know nothing about the Xmen, Superman or Batman. That being said why does every one feel the need to squeeze everything to fit a certain mold or market. Varrying tastes with different maturity levels are fine. Hell last night I watched some MLP, then finished the night off reading a novel about the fall of the Roman Republic.
I think with comic books and a lot of other intellectual property there is no need for a solid linear chronology. Not all batmans are the same. Darknight batman is not Arkham Asylum and I like that. Different takes on the same great source material.
I also couldn't agree with you more about just tossing chronology as WELL as continuity, I love DC but if I have to hear them call their own work (Crisis on Infinite Earths) genius just ONE more time.... man I hate it when people blow their own horns (a lot) and expect it to have some credibility. It was a dodge. Plain and simple. It didn't even solve the problem of continuity or we wouldn't have Countdown, Infinite Crisis, 54 (named after the number of times they've used this dodge OR number of retcons per month take your pick) and who can forget the masterful compilation: No, really we mean it this time and we aren't laughing at you! It makes me glad that I learn about all of this stuff in second hand conversation and loans rather than spending my own cash on it, god I'd feel stupid! That can (and does) go for games!!