however Platos god was not a relevant part of his philosophy. Like Aristotle the god was just an explanation in their philosophy. Religious philosophy was hardly a relevant part of philosophy before Augustine.JBrasington said:This presumes that God is divinely perfect. Plato's 'god' was more of an imperfect molder of matter.dark-amon said:sorry, missed the -button. pre-socratic (that wich was before Socrates) there was three premises presented in the definition of divine perfection power, knowledge and goodnes. They have been used in presenting arguments on both sides of the god-argument since.Falseprophet said:What the hell does that even mean?dark-amon said:goodness presented presocratic.
I do however when re-reading my first post see that I did a poor job writing it. It does seem like I say that the perception of gods where neverchanging. Tp be more precise: There was a lot of different views on how the world existed in pre-socratic times. They became more non-changing with Augustine and the ending of the ancient period. However Augustine and those after did take alot of inspiration from the greek philosophers, on one part the three parts of Gods perfection wich is highly relevant in Augustines defence of the free will