The Big Picture: One Day in November

Recommended Videos

Leftnt Sharpe

Nick Furry
Apr 2, 2009
560
0
0
SonOfVoorhees said:
In the UK the next election will be brutal. We have 3 main parties, America has 2 main parties. These are split into "party for the poor" and "party for the rich".....the 3rd party are losers in the middle. Being how fucked up the current "party for the rich" government is (as in raising tax for poor people, cutting benefits but lowering income tax for the rich....wtf!)I predict people will vote for marginal parties. Like UKIP and BNP.....the worrying thing is the BNP have a history comparable to the KKK and Neo Nazi parties.

Thing is, you push the people and they will push back.
Labour hasn't been the party for the working class since Neil Kinnock, New Labour is basically a cross between the Tories and the Lib Dems. At least thats how it seems to me. Although I won't be voting for any of them, they are all a bunch of 'brushed aluminium cyber-pricks'.

British elections are like Alien vs Predator: Whoever wins we lose.
 

aba1

New member
Mar 18, 2010
3,248
0
0
Mournblade94 said:
Mournblade94 said:
PsychedelicDiamond said:
You know... i think people who would rather play a video game instead of voting in one of the worlds most important political elections have no business voting anyway. I mean, dude, the game can wait.
And yet one vote is statistically insignificant. I am a registered voter, but I rarely go to the polls. It just doesn't matter if one CHOOSES to vote or not. I am VERY well informed. I often choose not to vote, because I know my one vote makes no difference. Your 1 vote could not even count as a significant digit unless we were molecular biologists working in the microliter range.

I will vote for a president when they can demonstrate they are not in league with Wall Street. Barak Obama I think is even more in league with wall street than Bush. Why would I vote for him? Maybe to keep someone that is MORE in league with Wall Street out like Mitt Romney? NO thankyou.

I'll play video games where I can make more of a difference.

Yes yes, I know. What if everyone felt that way? They don't so no harm no foul.
I never really understood this opinion if the system is so corrupt and is all the politicians are so awful why not do something about it. Don't sit on your ass and complain get out there and start your own campaign based around doing what is right for the people first and corporations second. There are enough people out there with the same feelings as you there is your votes and support right there hell you can use online support places like kickstart. You won't though because just like everyone else it is easier to complain and do nothing than to be bothered.
 

Lunar Templar

New member
Sep 20, 2009
8,225
0
0
DVS BSTrD said:
scotth266 said:
The conspiracy theory is just that: a conspiracy theory.

DVS BSTrD said:
Why couldn't you put this much effort into understanding ME3?
Seriously? Just drop it already. The ME3 thing is over. It's done. He had an unpopular opinion. Let. It. Go.
It's just insulting that he dismissed Retake Mass Effect out of hand, but goes to the trouble of calling the freaking president's campaign office over something as trivial as a Halo/Republican conspiracy theory. Does he REALLY have so little respect for gamers that he has to address the possibility that they might not be a capable of voting and buying a game on the same day?
right, cause the implications here are somehow less important then a bunch of butt hurt fanboys whining cause a video game didn't end to they're liking.

simple fact is if this was true, it would be a lot more important then the up roar over some ending, whats more, just because its false this time, doesn't mean it still can't happen.
 

newwiseman

New member
Aug 27, 2010
1,325
0
0
I'm in Oregon, I don't think an election has ever been decided by what side we vote for, regardless we vote my mail in ballots that may be dropped off at collection boxes. Basically I will have already voted by November 1st.

While we're talking about the election, why the F*#% are we still using the electoral college system?

somonels said:
I'm to lazy to even eVote or mVote. The biggest lie in local politics is that it matters.
If it comes down between two large corporation backed interchangeable yes men then you have a point, and yes that is ever increasingly the case in this country. Regardless the only power that the average citizenry have is their right to vote. If you don't vote you can't complain. Why else would both side spend so much money transporting people to the election offices to vote. Also why else would they spend so much time redistricting counties to that votes shift from one party to the other.

Personally I want a bill to be drafted into law requiring all new laws that pass through congress to have to be voted on in a general election, provided it is not directly tied to a time sensitive matter. Maybe then some shit would actually get passed or fixed.
 

disappointed

New member
Sep 14, 2011
97
0
0
I object to this "gaming is about fantasy" bit that snook in at the end. Fantasy is a part of gaming but not the whole of it. The whole simulation genre is devoted to having as much realism as possible. There have even been any number of political sims over the years and those are much more about exploring political issues than playing fantasy president.

There seems to be a subset of gamers who think gaming should be kept in a bubble, separate from the real world, so that they can be sure that burying themselves in a game will in no way force them to confront any facet of reality. Me no likey. More reality please. More politics, more culture, more society, more philosophy, more history, more humanity and, above all, more truth.

OT: When a conspiracy theory gets supporting evidence, it ceases to be a conspiracy and the conspiracy theorists get bored and wander off. Don't have that trouble here. Load of old cobblers. Poor showing by MS though. Have a bit more respect for your nation's traditions.
 

Twilight_guy

Sight, Sound, and Mind
Nov 24, 2008
7,131
0
0
These seems like it could all be summed up in two points:
Get your damn priorities straight (election > video games)
Don't be addicted to games (Good over-all advice but saying 'too busy, Halo' means you have a problem)
 

subtlefuge

Lord Cromulent
May 21, 2010
1,107
0
0
It makes more sense that the election day release is more intended to tie in with important events as a memory cue. "I need to go vote, and I guess I'll pick up the new Halo game while I'm out" seems a more likely response from young adults than "I could vote, but I'd rather play Halo".

I pass 3 areas that I could vote on the way to the nearest game store, and I'm sure that many people pass several game stores on their way to vote.
 

Invadergray

New member
Oct 17, 2011
93
0
0
AdamRBi said:
While it certainly is possible, as politics isn't the most straight of operations, it doesn't sound like a move a software company would make.

Does make me wonder WHY they did choose that dat as opposed to say November 7th or even the following weekend. What is it about that Tuesday that makes them want to release it?

Only reason I could think of is that a release in November gives stores time to restock the game for Black Friday after the initial launch. But middle of the week and corresponding to an important date in American politics... Unless there's a crafty ad campaign coming out of this I'll see little point to it.

An awesome ad campaign around this though would be cool. Vote and then pick up Halo 4.
As for 'why that Tuesday in particular,' I really can't say, but just to clear the air, the reason most big games are released on Tuesday is because sales charts come out on Monday, so if they release Tuesday they have 6 whole days to sell as many copies as possible and get good sales figues.
 

Grunt_Man11

New member
Mar 15, 2011
250
0
0
PsychedelicDiamond said:
You know... i think people who would rather play a video game instead of voting in one of the worlds most important political elections have no business voting anyway. I mean, dude, the game can wait.
Most definitely this.

If I can buy the game on that date I would simply do one of the following:

1) Go vote, then go buy the game, and then go home and play it.
2) Go buy the game, then go vote, and then go home and play it.

Chances are I'd do the first option. It's what the Forerunners would want and ask of me.

`

Kind of a side note: Ugh... both Democrat and Republican candidates are horrid. Anyone know the name of the Independent candidate?
 

LetalisK

New member
May 5, 2010
2,769
0
0
newwiseman said:
If it comes down between two large corporation backed interchangeable yes men then you have a point, and yes that is ever increasingly the case in this country. Regardless the only power that the average citizenry have is their right to vote. If you don't vote you can't complain. Why else would both side spend so much money transporting people to the election offices to vote. Also why else would they spend so much time redistricting counties to that votes shift from one party to the other.

Personally I want a bill to be drafted into law requiring all new laws that pass through congress to have to be voted on in a general election, provided it is not directly tied to a time sensitive matter. Maybe then some shit would actually get passed or fixed.
That makes absolutely no sense. Someone refuses to vote on the basis that either choice is essentially the same destructive person, but unless they perform a symbolic act they aren't allowed to complain about it? Unless they lend what little legitimacy they can to a person they don't like, they aren't allowed to talk about why they don't like them? Which is funny, because voting is not the only power the average citizenry has. Another big one we have is...*drum roll*...complaining! You know, writing to congress, protesting, etc. I dare say complaining is more effective at changing the system than voting.

Edit: fixed the quote
 

MowDownJoe

New member
Apr 8, 2009
464
0
0
subtlefuge said:
I pass 3 areas that I could vote on the way to the nearest game store, and I'm sure that many people pass several game stores on their way to vote.
Not for me. The building I do my voting at is in an entirely opposite direction from my nearest Gamestop or equivalent. Thankfully, when given the option between turning right (Halo) and turning left (voting), I turn left, easily. I don't care for Halo.

(Also, Escapist... ads in your captchas? Really? I thought you couldn't find a more intrusive form of advertising if you tried [http://imgur.com/qg7Qj], but I guess I was wrong.)
 

Something Amyss

Aswyng and Amyss
Dec 3, 2008
24,759
0
0
scotth266 said:
The conspiracy theory is just that: a conspiracy theory.

DVS BSTrD said:
Why couldn't you put this much effort into understanding ME3?
Seriously? Just drop it already. The ME3 thing is over. It's done. He had an unpopular opinion. Let. It. Go.
An opinion he's continued to passive-aggresively toss otu as recently as last week.
 

Aprilgold

New member
Apr 1, 2011
1,995
0
0
LordLundar said:
DVS BSTrD said:
It's just insulting that he dismissed Retake Mass Effect out of hand, but goes to the trouble of calling the freaking president over something as trivial as a Halo/Republican conspiracy theory. Does he REALLY have so little respect for gamers that he has to address the possibility that they might not be a capable of voting and buying a game on the same day?
He didn't call the president (doubt he'd get through anyway), he called the campaign office. Probably his local one which is one of several hundred in the country and are there for exactly that purpose.

Next, let's compare the two topics shall we?

- Electing the next 4 year leader of the country you live in in a time period of the country being the most divided it has been since the Civil War.

- Causing an uproar because a company didn't make an ending of a game precisely the way they wanted.

You are trying to say that the latter is CLEARLY more important than the former?

You need to look at your priorities.
Both are equally wacky if you think on it. Microsoft pays Romney very little to help him win the campaign by getting Halo 4 to release on the same date as the campaign to draw voters for Obama away so Romney can win, but then disguise it with it also being released universally so it looks like just a giant coincidence.

Honestly its low repect for people that play games that pisses me off. So your telling me that I can't walk down and place a pre-order on Halo then go vote, come back, get it and play for the next twenty hours? Honestly, voting takes about a hour at least where I'm currently at, and walking to the gamestop from there would be another hour, then a hour walk home, so I'd be home at about three in the afternoon.

We could very easily suppose that a movie released on Election Day that could be assumed that its goal is to net in their President-Of-Choice's foe away with said movie would be easily dismissed by Movie Bob as a Patriotic Film or that they would have time to do both, but gaming suddenly means that I can't do the blindingly obvious which is go here, buy Halo then go vote, come home and play?

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

As said above, if we switched Halo with a movie instead, Movie Bob would be excusing the theories with things like its just a Patriotic Movie and they can do both, watch it and vote.

From what I see, he has a very sterotyped version of Gamers which is that they can't stop playing or thinking about games all day long, and thats all they do and its harms those around them because they won't stop for anything which is utter bull shit if I have anything else to say.

Whats stopping me from simply buying Halo 4 before or after I go voting? Hell, if I pre-order it I can get it with no line so thats even smarter. Theres nothing stopping me from doing both, and simply thinking that Games take up one whole day is simply absurd. They can take up several hours, but you don't drop everything to go play Call of Halo Battle 72 for the XTREME!
 

Furrama

New member
Jul 24, 2008
295
0
0
You can do both things on the same day. You can't own a day.

I won't be buying Halo and I doubt I'll be voting (for president anyway) this year, so I don't exactly carry much weight.

I thought "the redneck republican gun lovers" were the ones that played Halo the most anyway?
 

newwiseman

New member
Aug 27, 2010
1,325
0
0
LetalisK said:
newwiseman said:
If it comes down between two large corporation backed interchangeable yes men then you have a point, and yes that is ever increasingly the case in this country. Regardless the only power that the average citizenry have is their right to vote. If you don't vote you can't complain. Why else would both side spend so much money transporting people to the election offices to vote. Also why else would they spend so much time redistricting counties to that votes shift from one party to the other.

Personally I want a bill to be drafted into law requiring all new laws that pass through congress to have to be voted on in a general election, provided it is not directly tied to a time sensitive matter. Maybe then some shit would actually get passed or fixed.
That makes absolutely no sense. Someone refuses to vote on the basis that either choice is essentially the same destructive person, but unless they perform a symbolic act they aren't allowed to complain about it? Unless they lend what little legitimacy they can to a person they don't like, they aren't allowed to talk about why they don't like them? Which is funny, because voting is not the only power the average citizenry has. Another big one we have is...*drum roll*...complaining! You know, writing to congress, protesting, etc. I dare say complaining is more effective at changing the system than voting.

Edit: fixed the quote
Except the whole reason that said congressman is going to do anything about the complaints is because they are banking on the idea of reelection. If you outright aren't voting then why should your congressman give a shit. Sure if your loud enough you may influence actual voters, but the crux is they're working for votes.

Your representatives wants to keep their $174,000 a year jobs that have 40-60,000 dollar pensions if they are over 50 and manage to serve for 5-20 years, or any age if they serve 25 years. They also get top notch free health care and over a month of vacation every year. Not to mention all the "Campaign Contributions". It's a damn good job to land.
 

Sovereignty

New member
Jan 25, 2010
584
0
0
Oh no, you should vote instead of buying/playing a video game! I mean your vote matters!!!!! At least on the news it does... For those spiffy popular vote graphs... That don't actually mean anything... That doesn't help your candidate get elected... That actually can't bring about any change...


Actually let's change that.

What I mean is,

If you're one of the 538 people who will be carted off to vote with purpose... Then yes, please by all means skip this release and vote, (Though you were bound to do it anyway.)


Otherwise, do you realllllly think your vote matters?
 

somonels

New member
Oct 12, 2010
1,209
0
0
newwiseman said:
somonels said:
I'm to lazy to even eVote or mVote. The biggest lie in local politics is that it matters.
*words*
If you don't vote you can't complain.
*more words*
And that is where you made your mistake, believing another common lie. I can, I should, I will.
Otherwise a good post.
 

Adam Jensen_v1legacy

I never asked for this
Sep 8, 2011
6,651
0
0
The biggest lie in the world is the belief that presidential elections mean anything. People vote for their favorite candidate, sure. But then other, more powerful people get to control the president. This isn't a conspiracy theory, it's how politics works. Politicians are being run by lobbyists. It's the sad reality. People get the illusion of democracy, and it's good enough for most of them. The problem is, people are waking up. The more you fuck with them the faster they're gonna wake up. Internet is the biggest contributor to that. No wonder corporations want it censored. I can say with 90% certainty that by the end of this decade people will be fed up with all this bullshit.