The Big Picture: PC Gaming Is Dead - Long Live PC Gaming!

Recommended Videos

resemb

New member
Nov 18, 2009
1
0
0
i woud strongly disagree with bob here. I don't think it's dead or eaven dying but that's becouse i like PC games a lot. But most likely PC will be cept on life support by Blizzard for a little while longer or by other companys.
 

Notsomuch

New member
Apr 22, 2009
239
0
0
I am an avid PC gamer. I have not seen your video in it's entirety, but I disagree with everything You may or may not have said and the possibility of said things being said or not said offends my senses. I am at work right now, but I am going to start programming a simple game on my TI - 91 Graphing Calculator ridiculing you!
 

qeinar

New member
Jul 14, 2009
562
0
0
Thing is i would probably play more on my xbox if it came with a mouse and keyboard for the fps games. I do prefer fps and strategy games on the pc. Some people might think that is because my aim sucks and that i just suck at gaming on console, well that is simply not true: My Kd on cod games are waaay higher on the xbox. But i'm thinking.. a xbox with a mouse and keyboard would more or less be a bader version of a pc.
 

Astalano

New member
Nov 24, 2009
286
0
0
Darkauthor81 said:
Astalano said:
Darkauthor81 said:
If there's anything that's killing PC gaming, it's piracy. Just for giggles I look up Dragon Age 2 on Pirate Bay. 500+ seeders 10,000+ leechers. That's 10,000 people that are getting this game for free and that's only on that one day that I looked. Even if 1/4 of those people would have bought that game if they couldn't get it for free, that's a more money than I feel like calculating that the developer is losing out on. World of Goo creator, 2D Boy, released a statement that they compared their pc sales to the number of people logging onto their World of Goo servers and determined that 95% of the people playing had stolen the game.

95%!

I was tempted to do it myself for Dragon Age 2 since I refuse to give EA a dime of my money. But then I realized I'd be boycotting the company for hurting gaming's future while doing something myself that is hurting gaming's future. That's too much hypocrisy even for a jaded angry twenty something like myself.
Piracy isn't a problem sorry. Not when we have 19% growth to 16.2 billion market worth for PC gaming.
Yes I'm sure 2D boy is going to be very eager to develop another game for the PC and watch 95% of their potential profits fly out the window when their WII version had an insignificant piracy rate.
If you can't handle piracy and can't focus on selling the game then you shouldn't be making games. Stop bitching about piracy and make great games and sell them to actual PC gamers who buy their games.
 

DaBozz

New member
May 27, 2009
351
0
0
ZombieGenesis said:
dakorok said:
You're an idiot. PC gaming has been "dying" for years now, and I, along with many other PC gamers, are getting sick of seeing it pop up at least a few times every month.

Furthermore, I doubt the console gaming community would "be fine with it" if Bob had said that the console market was dying. I can't provide any proof, since it's a hypothetical situation, so we'll just leave that alone.

Finally, in regards to your comment about the maturity of PC gamers. I'm just going to look at your horrible grammar, chuckle to myself and move on.
See ZombieGenesis...even though I just retracted my comment and said sorry, people on the thread are flaming...just goes to show you.

@dakorok Well done you know what grammar is I am SOOOO impressed, you must be like really smart or something for picking out my horrid grammar do you have like a degree or something because your amazing!
 

Stickfigure

New member
Oct 31, 2007
100
0
0
Hmmmm.... no.

This rant is so confused I'm not sure Bob knows what he's ranting about.

I guess it boils down to: "The days of people buying $5000 rigs to play with the highest possible framerate are over."

To which I say: "No, you're probably wrong about this."

Yes, this will become a less popular option in the future. Except that it was not a particularly popular option to begin with. Most people just go to Best Buy, grab the $200 computer, and let that be the end of it. Some might go a little higher in cost, but for the most part an ubergaming rig was a fairly hobbyist move.

Of course that's not what we're talking about, because Bob has decided to define PCs as Desktops. And yeah, desktops are quickly falling out of favor with plenty of people. A laptop is simply more mobile than it's fixed-location competitor, never mind the other options listed. A laptop is also a personal computer, or PC. That people have gone to great lengths to willfully confuse PCs as Windows desktops does little to actually define it as such. Just like saying "supposably" over and over doesn't actually make it a word.

But let's address his statement directly, and see why it doesn't hold water:

1. Ubiquity

I have pretty much every console in the current generation. I like my consoles. But, for the most part, people are generally limited to one, maybe two consoles. Never mind that these consoles are massively incompatible with each other. Everyone and their grandmother has a PC, however. Not all of them are graphical powerhouses(hell, probably some don't even have a GUI), but the general omnipresence of a Personal Computer in every household makes it a pretty difficult market to ignore. Most of the Greatest Generation, Baby Boomers, even a hearty dose of Gen-Xers may not be a target. But they have kids and grandkids, and such progeny may not be able to sway the hearts and minds of their breadwinners into buying them a whole new vidja game console. So they have to make do with the one outlet they have: the computer.

What's more is these supposedly dying vessels of entertainment pretty much all share a common hardware architecture. Developers are more comfortable developing on them, a lot of the APIs are the same, and there's just an awful lot of inertia to overcome. Throw that in with distribution channels that not only allow people to easily purchase and acquire such games, but allow them to make multiple installs without multiple purchases(hey there, steam!), and you've created a pretty attractive platform for development and distribution.


2. Upgrades

Yes, most people don't like doing this still. However, take a look at GDC this year. Crytek engines, Unigines, whatever B:BC 3 uses. Developers have reached pretty close to the end of what the consoles can do, and yet it's years before the development cycle is over. Meanwhile, other tech is scrambling to establish dominance. And the easiest(and often most effective) way to do this is by proudly touting graphical superiority. That's pretty damn hard to do when everyone already uses the Unreal 3 engine. And granted, most of these engines scale downward, but there are gamers out there that still are bubbling with desire to purchase the latest and greatest, visually speaking.

That isn't to say that consoles don't receive upgrades. I don't see many NES games in Gamestop anymore. But each upgrade involves a radical change in architecture, APIs, often the spurning of backwards compatibility, and so on. While they do make steps towards allowing the systems to perform more tasks, they don't multitask, and their interfaces are TERRIBLE when it comes to conveniently accomplishing day-to-day tasks. Computers are simply better at doing these things, all while playing video games.


All right, enough with the listing, I hate replying by numbers. The point is that there's very little evidence to back your claim. There's evidence that handheld devices are becoming more popular. There's proof that casual gaming is a much bigger cash cow that hardcore gaming. And some publishing execs have even extolled the virtues of smaller, more convenient platforms, such as consoles, handhelds, and smartphones. But these are largely arguments against the hardcore games in general, not PC gaming. Meanwhile, let's look at what PCs are up to...

Blizzard is still kicking ass, taking names, and making sales, all the while supporting that extremely costly blister that is Activision, who's recently lost control of Infinity Ward, canned Guitar Hero, brought the Tony Hawk franchise to utter and complete ruin, while pouring more money into the bottomless pit that is DJ Hero. All while wasting tons in their various litigious actions.

Valve runs Steam, which is fast making them one of the highest profit-per-employee company in the software industry.

Dice is making Battlefield: Bad Company 3 with the PC in mind, secondarily porting over to other consoles.

Unigine is not only making its mark in the graphical world, but also doing a fair job encouraging cross-platform compatibility, further cementing its place in the gaming world.

The point is that PC gaming may not be the juggernaut anymore that it once was in hardcore gamers' heads. But that's a far cry from "the writing's on the wall."


I guess a faster way to respond to your statement is: [citation needed].
 

Soviet Steve

New member
May 23, 2009
1,511
0
0
I agree that the PC as we know it is evolving into a number of different things, though I don't think that stating 'PC gaming' accurately reflects the situation.

Plus I'm a sucker for strategy games so I'll probably be clinging like a fanatic to my desktop for quite some time. >_>
 

Wolfenbarg

Terrible Person
Oct 18, 2010
682
0
0
I dunno about this. Laptop sales are still running incredibly strong, so the games we know and love for the PC pretty much directly translate to that sort of gaming experience. Phones and tablets will not be to the level of user friendliness of a laptop for many years to come. I know I sure as hell won't be writing a report or a script on an ipad anytime soon.
 

ZombieGenesis

New member
Apr 15, 2009
1,909
0
0
DaBozz said:
ZombieGenesis said:
DaBozz said:
ZombieGenesis said:
DaBozz said:
if moviebob had said "Console gaming as we know it is dead" everyone (Even console gamers) would be fine with it
You're wrong and you know you are wrong.
This thread has yet to indulge in merely throwing insults back and forward, so please take that kind of mentality out of this. The PC audience has made valid points here, and it's long been established that the matter is less GAMING as it is FUNCTION.
Maybe read past page 2...?
And bob has made valid points too but no one is listening to them.
and chill out dude...your post comes over far to angry for my liking.
I enjoy PC gaming as much as most of you, but I'll still admit the medium is evolving.
I never denied the evolution of the medium, or that Bob's (albiet badly expressed) views on PC's being reinvented (as opposed to 'dying off') has a lot of reasonable ground. You weren't saying that though were you?
You were saying how PC gamers are immature and goading many people in this thread- not to mention the statement I quoted, which is either a vast misunderstanding or you really don't understand what you're saying.

As a proof example, I put it to you to write a brief "why consoles will be dead soon" thread and see just how much everyone loves you for it.
No, I was saying how some of the people on this tread need to be mature, I did not mean it at all PC gamers...I guess its my own fault for the wording, for that I am sorry.
but some of the replies I have seen make me ashamed to be a gamer, I thought we where beyond this...I been reading the Extra Credits threads and people seem to take the points they make well, but Bob gets no such nice treatment.
That's alright, no harm done.
I think the reason Bob is getting such a reaction, as he does in a few 'certain' topics he covers, is that deny it though he might my beloved Bobby does like to stir up the controversy pot. After all it was what made his shows get noticed in the first place, being one of the only game culture commentators to stand against the next gen consoles in favour of the retro.

But why so much scorn here? Possibly because the problems that are being addressed by PC gamers are the ones that console gamers don't even SEE in this video. People who own and play on PC's can recognise faults in Bob's logic that console players wouldn't be familiar with, and it seems quite obvious that Bob doesn't know all that much about PCs.
Understandable, as he said he only uses it for video editing.
But since that's the case I personally feel his opinion wasn't dead on the facts as he believed them to be- perhaps it would have been better had he been more careful with his words? (Insinuating that PC gamers were bitter old men who never got bought consoles as kids was a DREADFUL way of relating to that audience).
 

Esspytood

no Yabou
Dec 15, 2008
70
0
0
i'd happily except a future in which we can do everything we do on a PC anywhere, you know, not just a place you do everything at thats always the same place i.e. your bedroom... or a basement.

and i can't see any reason why the game we have can't be handled on a mobile device once the hardware can handle it.

a game like... Supreme Commander on something like... a tablet device would be the sweetest experience i'd ever have. even having mates over for a local multiplayer sesh. they could just get comfortable and go to war!

you can't deny how awesome that sounds right? makes me all tingly!

also, my GTX 580 would like me to remind you guys that i do game on the PC... but then again not as hardcore as most people. unless you could somehow play Garry's mod, in a hardcore sense... then again the only thing i do in gmod is build and abuse ULX's ragdoll command on myself.
 

Mrsoupcup

New member
Jan 13, 2009
3,487
0
0
Why do people fight over this? Technology changes all the time, thing become obsolete. It's just how it is. This whole thing reminds me of these two guys in the Air force fighting over weather the Raptor was better than the new JSF-35. Of course the JSF-35 is better, it's newer and more efficient.
 

Smooth Operator

New member
Oct 5, 2010
8,162
0
0
I will gladly accept anything that can replace my PC (preferably the Matrix).

But at this point you are saying spoons will replace knives... I guess if you really try hard enough you can cut everything with a spoon, but I for one like to have the right tool for the right job.
 

Darkauthor81

New member
Feb 10, 2007
571
0
0
Astalano said:
Darkauthor81 said:
Astalano said:
Darkauthor81 said:
If there's anything that's killing PC gaming, it's piracy. Just for giggles I look up Dragon Age 2 on Pirate Bay. 500+ seeders 10,000+ leechers. That's 10,000 people that are getting this game for free and that's only on that one day that I looked. Even if 1/4 of those people would have bought that game if they couldn't get it for free, that's a more money than I feel like calculating that the developer is losing out on. World of Goo creator, 2D Boy, released a statement that they compared their pc sales to the number of people logging onto their World of Goo servers and determined that 95% of the people playing had stolen the game.

95%!

I was tempted to do it myself for Dragon Age 2 since I refuse to give EA a dime of my money. But then I realized I'd be boycotting the company for hurting gaming's future while doing something myself that is hurting gaming's future. That's too much hypocrisy even for a jaded angry twenty something like myself.
Piracy isn't a problem sorry. Not when we have 19% growth to 16.2 billion market worth for PC gaming.
Yes I'm sure 2D boy is going to be very eager to develop another game for the PC and watch 95% of their potential profits fly out the window when their WII version had an insignificant piracy rate.
If you can't handle piracy and can't focus on selling the game then you shouldn't be making games. Stop bitching about piracy and make great games and sell them to actual PC gamers who buy their games.
Wait, so, you flip from "Piracy isn't a problem, the industry is still growing despite the massive losses" to "Thousands of people stole and played the game because it was... crappy... And they should make better games because people don't steal good games." Because, you know, people only steal and play bad games. Riiiight. I think I'm done here. Have a nice day pal.
 

Daveman

has tits and is on fire
Jan 8, 2009
4,202
0
0
This is more or less what I've been saying for ages. That consoles are only getting to the point of competing with PCs by becoming like them. They now have loads of extra functionality like BluRay and internet access and streaming video. The only reason a modern console is anywhere near as good as a PC is because it's nicking it's ideas. Hell, they even have bloody HARD DRIVES now. Rather than say PC gaming is dying though, we should say that all gaming specific devices are dying. Just like you can't get a phone now that isn't also a camera, a music player and whatever else you want it to be the same will be true of all devices in the coming years.

However Bob, I disagree with one point. Future kids laughing at the idea of a desktop and a specific area set aside for it. After all, the desk predates the desktop by a long way. People have always set aside specific areas for working in and that's more because that's the way our brain works. It's why people who play games and do a lot of other stuff in their bedrooms other than sleeping are more likely to suffer insomnia.

Also, cybernetic implant gaming... DO WANT!
 

Dango

New member
Feb 11, 2010
21,066
0
0
That was... horrid.

I'll skip a lot of the rage people have already covered and just point out that while ranting he said that the normal functions of PCs are moving to other (non-PC gaming) devices, and among that list he mentioned laptops. This of course means that according to Bob, laptops aren't PCs, and therefore you can't play PC games on a laptop. I will now disprove this by opening up Steam and double clicking S.T.A.L.E.R.: Shadow of Chernobyl, an FPS exclusive to PC.
 

Astalano

New member
Nov 24, 2009
286
0
0
Darkauthor81 said:
Astalano said:
Darkauthor81 said:
Astalano said:
Darkauthor81 said:
If there's anything that's killing PC gaming, it's piracy. Just for giggles I look up Dragon Age 2 on Pirate Bay. 500+ seeders 10,000+ leechers. That's 10,000 people that are getting this game for free and that's only on that one day that I looked. Even if 1/4 of those people would have bought that game if they couldn't get it for free, that's a more money than I feel like calculating that the developer is losing out on. World of Goo creator, 2D Boy, released a statement that they compared their pc sales to the number of people logging onto their World of Goo servers and determined that 95% of the people playing had stolen the game.

95%!

I was tempted to do it myself for Dragon Age 2 since I refuse to give EA a dime of my money. But then I realized I'd be boycotting the company for hurting gaming's future while doing something myself that is hurting gaming's future. That's too much hypocrisy even for a jaded angry twenty something like myself.
Piracy isn't a problem sorry. Not when we have 19% growth to 16.2 billion market worth for PC gaming.
Yes I'm sure 2D boy is going to be very eager to develop another game for the PC and watch 95% of their potential profits fly out the window when their WII version had an insignificant piracy rate.
If you can't handle piracy and can't focus on selling the game then you shouldn't be making games. Stop bitching about piracy and make great games and sell them to actual PC gamers who buy their games.
Wait, so, you flip from "Piracy isn't a problem, the industry is still growing despite the massive losses" to "Thousands of people stole and played the game because it was... crappy... And they should make better games because people don't steal good games." Because, you know, people only steal and play bad games. Riiiight. I think I'm done here. Have a nice day pal.
You misunderstood. I said piracy is irrelevantl; it's going to happen and you can't stop it. You can only keep making better games in the hope of increased sales.

Starcraft is the most pirated game of all time but one of the most lucrative games of all time.

Again, stop whining about piracy, it's getting old.
 

Darkons

New member
Jul 16, 2009
5
0
0
rage rage rage *add insults here* <3 pc gaming there done my job for today now I can sleep well.
 

Plurralbles

New member
Jan 12, 2010
4,611
0
0
I find it kind of sick. THe way that they market these seperate little parts make it so that each part becomes obsolete within a year of coming out. A gaming computer can last5 years. 2020's cloud-based stuff will last into 2022 and then completely be of no use with drivers specifically made to make them not work with the new shit.

I guarantee that without a powerful, flexible behemoth in your living room that will last you five years, you will see your wallet getting gouged for subpar garbage every other year.

The month I got my Core 2 Duo laptop was the day the i's were announced. $700 down the drain for something that can't do anything I want it to do.There is no way to upgrade this machine. THis shit is what will save the desktop.
 

Ian Lutz

New member
Jan 23, 2011
53
0
0
NEVER FORGET THE DREAMCAST!...What? it's hard not to get emotional when talking about that device.