The Big Picture: Skin Deeper

Recommended Videos

Malisteen

New member
Mar 1, 2010
86
0
0
TheSchaef said:
No, it's not. IT'S THE ENTIRE POINT.

Dr. King stood in front of a crowd one day and said he dreamed of a place where people were judged not by the color of their skin, but by the content of their character.

And now you're saying that if people are judged not by the color of their skin, but by the content of their character, that's racist. America has a lot of reasons that it has not yet moved beyond race, but I submit that one of those reasons - and a significant one, at that - is that some people WON'T LET IT.
Ignoring the ongoing structural racism in this country won't make it go away, and that's what color blindness has become. It's no longer used as a vision for the future to motivate us to fix the injustice of the present, it's used as an excuse to ignore the injustice of the present and wallow in the status quo. As it has been done here. As it always is whenever the issue of racial injustice is raised, only for those comfortable in the status quo to shout it down with a message of "I don't need to do anything, I don't even need to think about or acknowledge any racial problem, it's enough for me to just choose to be blind to it". When the ongoing racial problems in society are pointed out, those who champion the color blind mantra don't say "hey, society isn't living up to our ideal, we should get off our butts and do something about it", no, instead they shout down the squeaky wheel for so much as mentioning race in the first place.

If you think that's what Dr. King's message was about, if you think that's what his Dream was, then I would posit that you don't know Dr. King very well.


You DO know that Donna Bae is not only of Asian descent, but was actually born IN South Korea, right?
First, the good does not wash out the bad. Casting a Korean actor in a Korean Role does not make it ok to cast a white actor in another Korean role. Likewise, casting colored actors in white roles doesn't make it ok to cast white actors in colored roles. And this is because context is important, and the real world context means these two things are not equivalent.

That Bae's role as Sonmi 451 fell well within Hollywood's accepted stereotypes for Asian women does not stand in the films favor in this issue either, even if the role was meant in part as a criticism of those stereotypes, because we end up an Asian woman playing a role that fits with Hollywood's accepted asian racial stereotypes, while the white actor is playing the typically white role of 'heroic male lead', even when the character in question is Asian.

Look, it's not that I don't understand the fictional context of the films narrative, and it's not that I don't appreciate a cast that is far more diverse than one typically sees out of a big budget production. But that still doesn't make the casting of white actors in Asian roles ok. Furthering the technology for and precedent of white actors playing Asian roles is a bad thing. The things the film does well don't change that. It's not about hating the film or insisting that this one thing makes it bad or even stops it from being good. If I didn't allow myself to like anything with problematic racial or sexual representation issues, there wouldn't be much coming out of popular culture that I could like. But you can appreciate the good qualities of a film or other media offering while still pointing out and acknowledging problems it may have or negative social issues it may be a part of or contribute to.
 

LiquidGrape

New member
Sep 10, 2008
1,336
0
0
I would also like to chime in with the people who decry "colour blindness" as an unwillingness of, let's face it, white people to acknowledge the systematic privilege they continue to enjoy at the expense of other groups.
 

Malisteen

New member
Mar 1, 2010
86
0
0
LiquidGrape said:
I would also like to chime in with the people who decry "colour blindness" as an unwillingness of, let's face it, white people to acknowledge the systematic privilege they continue to enjoy at the expense of other groups.
a couple comics I like to show the "color blind" crowd who reject any discussion of race based social injustice, as well as those who decry affirmative action as "reverse racism":

http://www.redbubble.com/people/barrydeutsch/works/5562735-how-bob-benefits-from-racism?p=poster

http://24.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m5rr52cAlU1r38c2ko1_1280.jpg
 

Malisteen

New member
Mar 1, 2010
86
0
0
Let's go back to my initial comment, which you were responding
Revolutionaryloser said:
Maybe I didn't ask clearly enough. How are the casting choices in this film racist? You should probably check the cast list before answering and note a lot of the actors in the film, especifically a lot of the protagonists, are not white.
Let's go back to my original original comment that your question was responding to:

"Why the hell should the fictional context of the films narrative trump the real life context of Hollywood's racist casting choices?"

Here "hollywood's racist casting choices" is referring to the pervasive trends in how colored actors in general, and actors of Asian descent in this case, are and are not cast in Studio productions. Cloud Atlas plays into this pattern by casting white actors in the roles of Asian characters - and the real world context of the Hollywood system that the film exists as a part of makes that decision not at all equivalent to its simultaneous casting of colored actors in white rolls. Doing the latter does not excuse the former, and developing new technology to make 'racebending' easier only makes it easier for the Hollywood system to further marginalize colored actors and minimize real colored representation in the future.

Yes, the cast is more diverse than is typical for a Hollywood production, and that's a good thing, but the primary protagonists in the majority of its segments are still played by white actors, and when the colored actors are playing colored characters, they still fall within the racial stereotypes that colored actors tend to be restricted to in the Hollywood system. Even if part of the point of the film is to criticize these stereotypes, it's still playing into them.

The mistake you're making here, the mistake Bob makes in this video, is pretending this film exists all on its own, an island isolated from the trends and patterns and habits of big budget studio blockbusters. That you can look at the casting of just this film, and ignore the wider context of the society and film making industry of which it is a part. In a world where Asian American actors could play any Hollywood role, in a Hollywood where colored actors weren't overwhelming relegated to racially stereotyped side roles, in a world where casting a white man in the role of an Asian character didn't mean that likely the only asian male protagonists moviegoers might see that year is being played by a white man, in that world there would be no problem with the casting of Cloud Atlas.

But that's not the America we live in, and those aren't the movies we watch. What was Bob's rule again? Context is Everything. And because context is everything, you can't just look at the one film on its own. You have to, if you'll pardon the pun, consider the 'big picture', which includes not just the internal context of the film and its individual production, but also the wider real world context that this film is a part of. And in that real world context, casting white actors in the role of non-white characters just isn't cool.
 

theultimateend

New member
Nov 1, 2007
3,621
0
0
The Tall Nerd said:
Father Time said:
So Bob since the past is unchangeable and that historical stigma and blackface will always be around in the past, isn't those double standard justifications going to be eternal?

Seriously how would we know when we can drop the double standard altogether? I really want to know.

The answer's probably going to be more non-white roles but roughly how many do we need?
its gonna be a while, slavery wasn't that long ago, i know that's like 200 or so years, but in comparison to the life span of the planet , and humans, 200 years isn't that long.

and then civil rights, those things still have effects on our culture, like in this case people not liking to cast people with color for lead roles.

until enough time has passed where as the cultural balances can be tipped in a way that non white male can get fair say, you gotta deal with the double standards
Are you seriously comparing human history to astronomical timeframes?

Or is this one of those subtle sarcasm deals that is lost on the internet?

aba1 said:
People want racism to go away yet everyone keeps insisting on labeling each other like this. Why does it matter what actors got chosen they were obviously the best for their parts. People just need to let this whole race thing drop or it will never go away.
I think the point is that its wonderful to not be racist, that race doesn't matter, that talent is the most important thing. Choosing people who are best for the roles or choosing the best people who audition for those roles is the only correct answer.

Unless they are white, then you obviously white washed the whole thing and are terribly racist, shame on you.
 
Sep 24, 2008
2,461
0
0
It seems everyone is so butthurt about race. If you all truly want to move on, shrug. Shrug when these things happen. If they shouldn't matter, don't argue and rant that it shouldn't matter. When your girlfriend or boyfriend does something that doesn't matter to you, you don't spend ten minutes crafting an argument on why it doesn't matter to you, shouldn't matter to them and why they should just stop doing that thing.

The more white heterosexual males (and there were enough here to classify themselves at that) wail and fight against the fact that, yeah, people do want to be respected and feel valued in their manner of choosing, the more the other sides are going to feel they need to fight harder to be valued. If you make it a big deal, you make it seem to others that you don't want to because you might not consider it.

A long time ago, I had a girlfriend with body issues. She didn't think she was womanly enough. Eventually, I knew that my words weren't reaching her and that she needed to do like me and find acceptance from within. So I stopped answering her and told her I wasn't going to play that game with her over and over. That I cared about her, and I wouldn't be with her if I wasn't attracted to her. That wasn't enough. She needed to hear the words. I tried to make a stand for her and me, knowing that she needed this validation from within.

I was right, but she still was unhappy. If it truly didn't matter to me, if I wanted the best outcome, I should have smartened up and gave her the temporary thing she needed WHILE working on her esteem from the beginning. Even though I was right and I admittedly did get tired of it, I was wrong by not validating someone I supposedly cared about. If you all want to get over these things, you have to work through it with others instead of just being 'done with it'. You'll create more barriers than break down, and that will leave you dealing with it forever.
 

sleeky01

New member
Jan 27, 2011
342
0
0
Malisteen said:
Revolutionaryloser said:
How are the casting choices racist?
The overwhelming majority of rolls in Hollywood are written explicitly for white people.
Now hang on for a moment. Can you give a specific example of a role that was specifically written for a white person? Not one that was specifically written for an actor.
 

Arcane Azmadi

New member
Jan 23, 2009
1,232
0
0
Man, I so wish I could see this movie. Why the FUCK am I being expected to wait until next fucking year?!

theSteamSupported said:
I'm getting what you're trying to say, but one has to ask the question: why was the context ignored in the first place?
Because people are stupid. Seriously, that's all there is to it. People LOVE to stir up trouble and kick up a fuss over nothing and they regularly don't even THINK about what they're complaining about.
 

TheSchaef

New member
Feb 1, 2008
430
0
0
Malisteen said:
As it always is whenever the issue of racial injustice is raised, only for those comfortable in the status quo to shout it down with a message of "I don't need to do anything, I don't even need to think about or acknowledge any racial problem, it's enough for me to just choose to be blind to it".
Or in this case, the message of "stop shouting at me as if I am the problem with the world, and not the person who is ACTUALLY being racist. You know, in the real world, and not in the perpetual-retroactive-butthurt theoretical world.

It's improper for a person to be a dick to another person, full stop. It is immoral to deprive another person of their rights and protections under law, full stop. You seem to think it's racist not to don the Extra-Pious Hat of Racial Indignation whenever someone is being a dick because of another person's skin color. How about if I just don't like the fact that they're being a dick in the first place?

Casting a Korean actor in a Korean Role does not make it ok to cast a white actor in another Korean role.
That's not how the casting of this movie works. People were cast to play a series of overlapping, ambivalent-slash-androgynous roles. In a movie designed to strip away the perceived boundaries of race, gender, status, etc., doesn't it seem like protesting that one sub-role in one sub-story because it is supposed to be a "Korean role"... make you the one peddling race in this situation?

How would you have cast the movie to accommodate your sensibilities? Would you have cast Korean actors for all the roles, so that they would be "properly Korean" when this story was being told? How then would that work when they were all asked to put on negroid makeup and you've suddenly deprived a host of black actors from having proper work in Hollywood?
 

Milkman

New member
Sep 16, 2012
24
0
0
Suddenly I'm reminded of all the people who think The Adventures of Tom Sawyer is racist.
 

bunji

New member
Nov 14, 2010
70
0
0
SonOfVoorhees said:
Did you say its ok for a black person to play a white character, but not the other way round? Look Bob, no one gave a crap that the guy in Thor was played by a black actor, what annoyed them was that the character in the comic was white. These same fans would also complain if you made a Blade movie with a white guy playing Blade.

To be honest, if its original content then who cares what colour the actor is and whom they are playing. Have a black guy made up to look Chinese or a white guy made up to look black. A man in female make up. No one cares. Its just the PC crowd that jump on this stuff and paint it as a racial thing when its not and as usual its aimed more at the white people than other races.

Also as Bob seems to really love the Cloud Atlus movie im guessing the next few Big Pictures will be all about how amazing it is.
Damn straight, saying that we all need to place different ruls on different races so that we can all be equal is retarded.