I dunno...on the one hand, it's annoying that you can't talk your way out of it, but on the other hand, it's kind of realistic that there are groups whose agendas are simply 100% incompatible.MiracleOfSound said:Because I know someone is going to neglect to read the title, I shall spoiler box the following.
Refusing to help me anymore until I kill Parrthurnax? Really?
I can completely understand why they would bear a grudge against him due to his history. But to suddenly turn around and alienate Dovahkiin unless he kills him is just flat out retarded.
I thought the Blades were about honour and morals, not petty revenge that, in its short sightedness, potentially endangers the entire world by way of their inaction - alienating and wishing destruction on what is probably their greatest ally and asset in the struggle.
There really should have been another choice here. Dovahkiin should have been able to explain to Delphine and Old Wrinkly Neck how it is wrong to judge a beast on its primal nature, especially one who has spent thousands of years overcoming its nature in order to transcend it and improve itself ethically. The moral question is there, I'm not attempting to answer it here, just suggesting that Delphine is an idiot for posing it at the time she did.
What did you guys think? were the Blades right here or was it a really dumb request?
EDIT:
Then again, riffing on the idea of "dragons just want power"...who was the last Dragonborn everyone's talking about? Tiber Septim -- the guy who conquered all of Tamriel with a Dwemer robot and crowned himself emperor! Sounds pretty power-hungry to me. So if the Blades are really set on serving the Dragonborn, then they'll probably assume that said Dragonborn will realize his/her power-hungry nature sooner or later, and thus the best way to serve him is to wipe out all competition, and every dragon is a potential challenger to the Dragonborn.