this is an unhealthy habit among gamers i think needs to stop, along with a lot of another things but this mostly
i speak of the unnecessary comparison of one game to another, were a person will shun a game because it does not do something
like another game they have liked and dub better than all others in its category.
i bring this up because in recent days a myth seems to have spread that God of War is the is all end all of hack and slash games,
and that any other game that even dares to venture its territory is nothing more than a rip of because what i had failed to realize was that
god of war was the first hack and slash ever and is a totally original idea (sarcastic laughter fenarr fenarr)
but i seem to be getting of topic here, and its not just god of war that has now become a bar to witch all games must reach or die trying, but
its thing like halo or modern warfare 2 being a bar for the FPS to strive towards, final fantasy being the pinnacle of RPG games, grand theft auto being the sandbox role model, these are just a few examples but you get the general point,
now while it is good times for all when a game that truly does stand out from others appears on the market, i do not then think it should
be used as a comparison for other games of that kind, because there is know such thing as an original game idea now a-days, every idea has been done, and probably done better to boot.
the point of this being is that while we should view all games as a singular thing, when a game is great, we leave it at that, when a game is bad, same thing, and scrap this whole "my game is better than your game for these reasons" business, because its not leading anywhere fast or good, it just creates arguments and overly pointless wars between gamers.
but am i just being naive in thinking this, personally i believe the eradication of comparison amongst most things would lead to a lot more happy people, i men its all the same, its the little differences that should be recognized and enjoyed, but again i do not know
i mean tell me what you think ?
i speak of the unnecessary comparison of one game to another, were a person will shun a game because it does not do something
like another game they have liked and dub better than all others in its category.
i bring this up because in recent days a myth seems to have spread that God of War is the is all end all of hack and slash games,
and that any other game that even dares to venture its territory is nothing more than a rip of because what i had failed to realize was that
god of war was the first hack and slash ever and is a totally original idea (sarcastic laughter fenarr fenarr)
but i seem to be getting of topic here, and its not just god of war that has now become a bar to witch all games must reach or die trying, but
its thing like halo or modern warfare 2 being a bar for the FPS to strive towards, final fantasy being the pinnacle of RPG games, grand theft auto being the sandbox role model, these are just a few examples but you get the general point,
now while it is good times for all when a game that truly does stand out from others appears on the market, i do not then think it should
be used as a comparison for other games of that kind, because there is know such thing as an original game idea now a-days, every idea has been done, and probably done better to boot.
the point of this being is that while we should view all games as a singular thing, when a game is great, we leave it at that, when a game is bad, same thing, and scrap this whole "my game is better than your game for these reasons" business, because its not leading anywhere fast or good, it just creates arguments and overly pointless wars between gamers.
but am i just being naive in thinking this, personally i believe the eradication of comparison amongst most things would lead to a lot more happy people, i men its all the same, its the little differences that should be recognized and enjoyed, but again i do not know
i mean tell me what you think ?