The Dark Knight Rises - Full Review

Recommended Videos

bobmus

Full Frontal Nerdity
May 25, 2010
2,285
0
41
<color=black>The Dark Knight Rises - A Review

Disclaimer: I have never read the comics and am by no means a professional reviewer. Opinions are subjective, but this is my one.

http://www.movieblogbuster.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/The-Dark-Knight-Rises-2.jpg

My girlfriend secured tickets for the two of us to a free preview screening of The Dark Knight Rises, which turned out to be in an almost-empty IMAX screen. I was pumped, though a little wary of the legacy the movie had to live up to. Got to say, I really liked that I could watch this in IMAX without having to suffer through 3D - better in every way, for me.

To put it simply, I bloody loved this movie. Perhaps even better than The Dark Knight, for me, though a fairer assessment of that will come with a re-watch of the two. To help you out, I'll put even the mildest of spoilers in spoiler tags (I won't comment on any specific plot points, but I might comment on say, how the ending felt).
Now come on, let's get started!

<color=black>The VillainI'll start off with this one, as it's probably the biggest worry most people have in terms of the film living up to its predecessor. Heath Ledger's Joker was incredible, a great villain that you'll remember for a long time after you've seen the movie. Bane is not. In full credit to Tom Hardy, he does a brilliant job here - he is unrecognisable from his other stuff, and the pure menace of the character is told brilliantly. The flamboyant and deranged nature of Joker is just fundamentally more interesting as a villain, but I felt the film did a good job of not attempting to rival that dynamic.
<spoiler=Mild Spoilers>Bane acts more as a plot device here - a menace who is stronger than Batman, and who forces him to grow stronger in order to overcome him. He makes his mark through his violence - he kills people with zero fuss, and carries on as though these things had never happened.
<spoiler=Slightly Bigger Spoiler>I personally felt his end was extremely anticlimactic, and almost worryingly so. He is dealt with, and then forgotten in the same minute.
NB: I could hear Bane's voice just fine - whatever trickery they did with getting his voice out worked pretty darn well.

<color=black>The StoryMy gut feeling is that this plot will be divisive, for reasons I will discuss in slightly more depth in the spoiler tags. The central plotline of Bane and his crew is excellent, but has been almost entirely spoiled through trailers. That's almost all I can say without spoilers, so to the boxes!
<spoiler=Spoilers>Bane's takeover of Gotham feels very similar to what Joker attempted to do with his two ferries, though on a much wider scale. However, I felt it was no longer attempting to show that the people were a force for good - in fact, at one point the words 'Innocent is a strong word to use for Gotham' are said - which makes this film possibly an even darker Batman than the previous one!
<spoiler=The End - Big Spoilers Inside><spoiler=Do Not Click Without Watching The Movie First>The end left me feeling ridiculously elated. Though some might have wished for a darker ending, and one a little less phoned-in, I was personally thrilled at what they went with. There were nods to most of our favourite characters (although I missed anything more about Fox, might just have been me), and a satisfying conclusion to almost all of the various plot-threads.

<color=black>BatmanBatman manages to be a slightly more interesting part of the story this time - his development arc is his own, and his care for his life, and those around him, is of a slightly more interesting depth than simply being about 'that one girl I like'.
<spoiler=Small Spoilers>There's a bit of confusion over the fact that some people can identify Bruce Wayne as the man behind the mask, and others can't without being explicitly told it.

<color=black>CatwomanI don't predict too many people having an issue with Anne Hathaway's portrayal of Catwoman. She's sassy, smart and surprisingly flexible - and she's got the looks of Anne Hathaway.

http://www.flicksandbits.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/anne-hathaway-catwoman-the-dark-knight-rises-selina-kyle-suit.jpg

<color=black>Other CharactersAll our old favourites - Alfred, Gordon and Fox - are back, though Alfred and Fox take more of a backseat in this story. Plus, we also get a new character, policeman John Blake, portrayed by Joseph Gordon-Levitt - JGL is as like-able as ever, and gives us an alternative perspective of the little man trying to make a difference. There's clearly an absolutely massive support cast, and all do a fantastic job towards creating the image of Gotham through the bad times.
(Note: I feel like Scarecrow was there, or at least the actor who played him. Bit confusing.)

<color=black>MusicI wouldn't be at all surprised to see Hans Zimmer get another Oscar nomination for this, perhaps even win it. It's a suitably epic soundtrack, and the drum-beat/chant he created (you've heard it in the trailers, again) will get your heart pounding and adds to the tension.

<color=black>Cinematics Things that should have felt big felt big. Action felt fast-paced without feeling sickeningly jerky. All-but-one of the scene changes were very smoothly done. Not a great deal more I can say here.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This film has a lot to stand up against - its predecessor, Avengers Assemble and its own hype train - so how does it compare? Personally, I felt it more than beat its own hype, that it stands up well to The Dark Knight, and is equally as good as Avengers Assemble - the two evoke a very different feel. The Dark Knight Rises is a dark and tense storyline, with a plot full of emotion and suspense; Avengers Assemble is much lighter, funnier and more character-driven than it is about the plot.

Go and see this movie.

Opinions, disagreements, corrections? Post them below! In fact, if you liked my review at all, please say so!
 
Dec 14, 2009
15,526
0
0
Fuck you Bobmus.

Fuck you and your stupid fucking early tickets.

I hate you.

[sub][sub]Good review, I suppose.[/sub][/sub]
 

Ryan Hughes

New member
Jul 10, 2012
557
0
0
Dark Knight Rises Mini-Review: 7/10.

Better than Spider Man 3. Ideological narrative confusion causes you to wonder if Christopher Nolan is sane. Predictable plot "twists." Though the editing is choppy at times, it is still much better than the hack-and-slash of "The Dark Knight" act II. Great acting, though Morgan Freeman and Michael Caine have diminished roles. The actor portraying Bane is solid, though no Heath Ledger. Some logical cause-and-effect failures within the plot, which cause the aforementioned plot twists to become apparent.

The diminished role of David Goyer -the screenwriter for the first two- can be felt, especially because we see the return of several cheesy one-liners throughout the film. This is not wholly unwelcome, but it is inconsistent with the previous two films.

Overall, a good movie, perhaps the best of the summer, but it falls short compared to the previous two entries.
 

shrekfan246

Not actually a Japanese pop star
May 26, 2011
6,374
0
0
TheBobmus said:
(Note: I feel like Scarecrow was there, or at least the actor who played him. Bit confusing.)


Opinions, disagreements, corrections? Post them below! In fact, if you liked my review at all, please say so!
He was, as Dr. Crane outside of his Scarecrow persona. It was a small cameo, like his appearance in The Dark Knight at the start of the film.

Another thing to note is the "Villain" section, because I know you didn't want to spoil too much -

[HEADING=2]I will warn people who read this that everything marked in the spoiler tags of my post is a rather large spoiler for this film.[/HEADING]

Bane comes across as a plot device because he is - Talia al Ghul (daughter of Ra's al Ghul from the first film) is the mastermind behind the operation. She is pulling the strings behind Bane for the entirety of the plot, which is also incidentally the twist. I imagine that it falls a bit flat to people who don't know much about the Batman universe outside of the Nolan movies, though, because her character essentially appears out of nowhere.

His personal end was very anti-climactic though.

Batman felt incredibly absent from his own film. There was very little time actually spent around Batman as Batman, and I agree with MovieBob that it almost feels like there was two movies which were being created in tandem and ended up being smashed together. Especially the final fight scene between Batman and Bane, the two characters surrounded by all of these police officers and normal thugs felt very out-of-place.

The implications at the end of the film with Joseph Gordon-Levitt's character finding the Batcave left me feeling very excited for the possibilities of maybe having the Nolan-verse being tied together like Marvel has done with the Avengers. It is heavily implied that Gordon-Levitt will pick up the mantle of Batman, and my mind immediately leaped to assumptions of a Batman Beyond-style film that ties in with a possible Justice League conglomeration, especially given the Man of Steel trailer, done by Christopher Nolan as well.

Selina Kyle was done very well, and I take no issues with any part of her character - Especially since she is never referred to as Catwoman at any part during the film.

[HEADING=2]I will again warn people who read this that everything marked in the spoiler tags of my post is a rather large spoiler for this film.[/HEADING]
 

shrekfan246

Not actually a Japanese pop star
May 26, 2011
6,374
0
0
Ghostwise said:
While the kid from 3rd rock from the sun would make a decent Batman Beyond character I am more hopeful that he will become Nightwing and be his own man(which he very much was in the movie) and not try and mimic Batman. Also....Nightwing would fit rather well in the grand scheme of the Nolan vision of Batman imo. :D
I can see your point, but if DC did decide to try making a Justice League continuity, more people are familiar with Batman and he is an actual member of the Justice League. Considering the end of Rises heavily implies that Bruce Wayne, if in fact still alive and not just a figment of Alfred's imagination, has left the mantle of Batman to Gordon-Levitt's character, it would make sense to me for them to lead that into a Batman Beyond origin story.

He would play a stellar Nightwing, but I don't think it would make sense within the already established Nolan-verse, assuming they use that for a Justice League series of films. I suppose they could break established continuity even more than they already have, making Nightwing a member of the Justice League in Batman's place, but I would be surprised by that turn of events. DC isn't exactly known for taking huge risks. :D
 

Hazy992

Why does this place still exist
Aug 1, 2010
5,265
0
0
Good review, I'd say I agree for the most part. I don't think it's as good as The Dark Knight or The Avengers (I refuse to call it Avengers Assemble :p) but for me those movies are on such a high level of epicness they're hard to beat. This was still a great movie :D
Ghostwise said:
While the kid from 3rd rock from the sun would make a decent Batman Beyond character I am more hopeful that he will become Nightwing and be his own man(which he very much was in the movie) and not try and mimic Batman. Also....Nightwing would fit rather well in the grand scheme of the Nolan vision of Batman imo. :D
shrekfan246 said:
I can see your point, but if DC did decide to try making a Justice League continuity, more people are familiar with Batman and he is an actual member of the Justice League. Considering the end of Rises heavily implies that Bruce Wayne, if in fact still alive and not just a figment of Alfred's imagination, has left the mantle of Batman to Gordon-Levitt's character, it would make sense to me for them to lead that into a Batman Beyond origin story.

He would play a stellar Nightwing, but I don't think it would make sense within the already established Nolan-verse, assuming they use that for a Justice League series of films. I suppose they could break established continuity even more than they already have, making Nightwing a member of the Justice League in Batman's place, but I would be surprised by that turn of events. DC isn't exactly known for taking huge risks. :D
Yeah obviously it looks like Jonathan Blake is going to take over from Batman, but I don't think he'll actually be Batman, not even Batman Beyond style. I know it's a bit contrived but he says his real name is Robin so I think that's what it's gonna lean more to but done in a different way to the comics. He could even be a version of Red Robin. I agree Nightwing would go well in that universe though.
 

Hazy992

Why does this place still exist
Aug 1, 2010
5,265
0
0
I did find the ending a bit cheesy though. I mean he wasn't just a figment of Alfred's imagination was he? That was Selina Kyle with him, right?

It's still a decent ending though, because if it is real then it's good Bruce Wayne finally gets to settle down and lead a normal life. Having him die would probably be a bit of a downer
 

tehweave

Gaming Wildlife
Apr 5, 2009
1,942
0
0
Minor but vague spoiler:

The first 90 minutes is a complete mess. Horrible pacing, rushed story/plot points, scenes that dart in and out too quickly. The last 74 minutes are really freaking amazing.

Meduim spoiler:

The true turning point was when Batman and Bane face off. There's a couple of badly paced scenes afterward, but it mostly becomes a huge rising action when Bane takes over Gotham, leading to a great climax. Yes, he's kind of swiftly dealt with and forgotten, but his turn was over at that point.

Maximum spoiler:

The reason he was forgotten was because we learned who the true villain of the movie was. Bane was no longer necessary, and like all true mercenaries (in cinema), once you're not needed, you're removed.

Overall problem with the movie:

What the hell happened up until the Bane/Batman fight? It's like Nolan and his brother decided to do an extremely rushed "here's all the ideas we wanted to do in the movie but didn't have time for" hack/slash job when it came to editing? It felt like half of each scene was cut out for time purposes.

I'd be willing to watch a 4 hour Batman movie if it meant we took a little more time with the first part. It's too damn quick as it stands. I hope they release a better version onto DVD/BluRay.
 

imnot

New member
Apr 23, 2010
3,916
0
0
TheBobmus said:
(Note: I feel like Scarecrow was there, or at least the actor who played him. Bit confusing.)
he was there, Gordon calls him by his name (Crane)

OT: I saw it yesterday, it was brilliant, I think as a film the dark knight was better, but as an ending to a trilogy this was better (If you made the dark knight the ending I mean)
 

Fappy

\[T]/
Jan 4, 2010
12,010
0
41
Country
United States
Good review man. I have similar feelings about pretty much everything you mentioned. Though, I wish Alfred was in it more :(