How dare you Squid, how dare you believe the Earth is round, I mean thats blasphemy, is that what you will teach our next generation of children? the Earth is round.squid5580 said:Wow way to be an illiterate D-bag. If you had read the post you quoted you might have seen that I don't believe but just happened onto the site and out of a quest for knowledge actually read through it. I wouldn't expect someone like you to understand a concept like that though.Attack nun said:-snip on the rants of an idiot-squid5580 said:A few days ago I followed a link a fellow Escapist posted and found the Flat Earth forums. I read thier FAQ I was afraid. For those of you who may not know they believe the earth is flat and at the edges are big ice walls that prevent everything from falling off. And Nasa with the governments of the world have conspired against us regular folk by doctoring photos from space.
So here is my question. WHY? What would anyone have to gain from hiding this fact? Every other conspiracy theory has an end game. They are trying to accomplish something. Aliens have landed and the government is hiding it. Why? Because if the public knew there would be panic. Or the country with the alien could gain an upper hand in the technology race. Faking the moon landing so America could give Russia the finger. These all make sense. So what would anyone have to gain from this? Can anyone offer a logical explanation?
This. Actually, the whole "Flat Earth belief" thing was made up by the author of a 19th-century anti-catholic pamphlet called, if memory serves me right, "Beliefs of the Church Fathers". It basically contained a lot of malarkey about how the early Christians and medieval theologians were a bunch of idiots with no knowledge of the world around them. The "Flat Earth" thing then got popular with American journalists during a period of anti-Irish sentiments, and that's how it entered popular consciousness.Dam0 said:I don't think you'll ever find any written historic evidence that anyone thought the world was flat.
The belief people from ?olden times? thought the world was flat is a myth.
Remember Turnwise and Widdershins, mate.Clashero said:Frankly, if the Earth were round, then all the compasses in the world are bullshitting us, since there would be no North. Just Rimward and Hubward. (100 points if you get this reference)
Fixedsirbryghtside said:Nothing. It's A MADE-UP CRAZY THEORY FROM A TIME WHEN PEOPLE COULDN'T EXPLAIN THE WORLD..
Absolutely hilarious. Or how about this enlightening bit of info:Once again, picture in your mind a round world. Now imagine that there are two people on this world, one at each pole. For the person at the top of the world, (the North Pole), gravity is pulling him down, towards the South Pole. But for the person at the South Pole, shouldn't gravity pull him down as well? What keeps our person at the South Pole from falling completely off the face of the "globe"?
*sigh*In the Efimovich model, the planet Earth is supposed to be a large, spherical shaped ball of rock flying through space at hundreds of thousands of miles per hour. But how could the Earth continue to move at the same speed for as long a time as the "round Earthers" say that it has existed for; namely, several billion years. If outer space were a vacuum, then there would be no problem. But space is not a vacuum, it is instead filled with ether. The earth would have to have been pushing its way through the ether for all those billions of years. Shouldn't it have slowed somewhere along the line? What would keep the Earth from grinding down to a stop at some point on the Efimovichian timeline?
Wait, did these come from the forum itself? Now I just want to join to point out the hilariously bed science involved.Baby Tea said:I don't know if anyone else has really been to the site, but I found some gems of information.
Well... not so much 'information' as hilarious misunderstandings of science.
Check this one out:
Absolutely hilarious. Or how about this enlightening bit of info:Once again, picture in your mind a round world. Now imagine that there are two people on this world, one at each pole. For the person at the top of the world, (the North Pole), gravity is pulling him down, towards the South Pole. But for the person at the South Pole, shouldn't gravity pull him down as well? What keeps our person at the South Pole from falling completely off the face of the "globe"?
*sigh*In the Efimovich model, the planet Earth is supposed to be a large, spherical shaped ball of rock flying through space at hundreds of thousands of miles per hour. But how could the Earth continue to move at the same speed for as long a time as the "round Earthers" say that it has existed for; namely, several billion years. If outer space were a vacuum, then there would be no problem. But space is not a vacuum, it is instead filled with ether. The earth would have to have been pushing its way through the ether for all those billions of years. Shouldn't it have slowed somewhere along the line? What would keep the Earth from grinding down to a stop at some point on the Efimovichian timeline?
You know, some people are freaking crazy and hilarious all at the same time.
This is the link [http://theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?PHPSESSID=13012371429f2ee6358371c7ec92f2fd&] to the FAQs section of their forum. It's pretty crazy.knottingam said:Can you provide a link?