The Gaming Review process is a Failure

Recommended Videos

HyenaThePirate

New member
Jan 8, 2009
1,412
0
0
As I see it, gaming reviews can be very helpful in telling you if you should or shouldn't spend your hard earned dollars on yet another poo-coaster of a game. It can even turn you on to games you hadn't considered before or explain aspects of a game that seemed confusing at first.
But the problem is, reviews seem to be under the control of the Game Makers, and I'll tell you how the industry screws us, the consumer.

First of all, Not every system plays every game the same. Ghostbusters for the PS3 might as well have been a different game entirely from the Xbox 360 version. Yet gaming reviewers of late have taken less and less time to differentiate between versions, often having a preferred console anyway that seems to always have the superior version in the review (and in many cases, the only reviewed version at all) resulting in games like Star Wars Unleashed getting similar ratings on the PS2 version as the PS3 version! How is that even possible? With Batman Arkham Asylum looming on the immediate horizon, while gaming sites have had NO PROBLEM telling me how I'll get an exclusive Joker gameplay option if I get the PS3 version, they seem awfully quiet on which console has the tighter gameplay. Being able to play as the Joker means bantha poodoo to me if the game is BROKEN. Worse, over the years I've become suspicious to little gimmicks like that, which always seem to work their bait and switch so that you end up taking it in the shorts with the crappier version. This is what happened to me with Assassin's Creed.
I got distracted by the hype, but the xbox version, and realized that it was the inferior version in every way, RUINING my gaming experience. Not to mention getting away with my hard earned cash in an economic recession.

Secondly, the system reams you by simply circumventing it's only regulator right from the start. Honestly, I was going to make it a personal policy to boycott buying any newly released game until the reviews come in, but then I realized I do that already. But that doesn't excuse this sneaky industry tactic of holding test-copies or worse, demanding reviewers "hold" their reviews until well AFTER the game's release date. Then to add to it, they offer everything and anything upfront to get you to PRE-ORDER the game and pick it up on release day, hoping to make most of their "idiot" money all at once. This is douchebaggery as I see it, because these companies KNOW when they are sloughing off an inferior product. Games are too expensive for me to be casually tossing $60+ at a half-assed title that I didn't know was half-assed because they held the game review process hostage until AFTER the game has "gone gold".

So whenever I see game makers lamenting companies like Game Stop, I just have a good hearty belly laugh, wipe my tears, and keep going. Buying and trading games for cheaper (although gamestop themselves are just pirates capitolizing on an already brutal system) is really the only answer us gamers have to combat the industry's dishonest practices. I really do want Batman Arkham Asylum, but then again I want a really good Superman game too, and lessons from the past have taught me that it's best to hold on and wait for a really long time until every last review comes in before getting my hopes up. Sure it's eye candy now, but how does it run? On the PS3 or the Xbox 360? There's often a difference and I want the best version.

/rant
Discuss.
 

Emphraim

New member
Mar 27, 2009
831
0
0
I'm pretty sure IGN has separate reviews for a game for each of its platforms. You also should never depend on reviews to tell you if a game is good. Check game play clips from fansites(not review sites), read comments and so on. Most importantly, hold off on buying a game for at least week after it comes out and read the game's forums for the reaction to the game. If it's operwhelmingly positive, get it. If it has more than 2 pages of rant threads then I don't get it. This saved me from Empire: Total War.
 

Powerman88

New member
Dec 24, 2008
272
0
0
I like reading game reviews for the same reason I like reading my horoscope. Entertainment; not a way to make decisions.
 

Baby Tea

Just Ask Frankie
Sep 18, 2008
4,687
0
0
HyenaThePirate said:
This is what happened to me with Assassin's Creed.
I got distracted by the hype, but the xbox version, and realized that it was the inferior version in every way, RUINING my gaming experience. Not to mention getting away with my hard earned cash in an economic recession.
The 360 version is bad? Man, I had no problems with that game.
And it was a blast! I love that game (Can't wait for the second one)!

Most game sites whose reviews I read offer insights as to the differences betwixt the 360 and PS3 versions, but only if they are noticeable. IF the game plays the same on both, then why review them separately? Or have two separate reviews? It would just be a placebo.
If there are game-breaking differences or changes, then it should certainly be mentioned, but I've always seen that in any reviews I read (unless I'm reading a console specific publication).

The changes or differences in most modern games between the 360 and PS3 is minimal, if there at all. People will always ***** or try to point out 'better' graphics or load times ("My 360 loads it 15 milliseconds faster! It adds up, baby!"..."Shuttup."), but I've seen little to no difference in modern games on these two systems.
It's another hype machine, but it's run by the customer base rather then the companies.
 

bluepilot

New member
Jul 10, 2009
1,150
0
0
I watch game review because they are funny.

Buying a game is always a hit or miss gamble on whether you will like it or not.
 

Blazing Steel

New member
Sep 22, 2008
646
0
0
Reviews are like advice your friend gives to you. It's what they think not what you think. It is impossible for someone to be completely biased when writing a reveiw. So for example Zero Punctuation will always reveiw a PC games for softly and a Wii games more hatefuly. All the systems are different and there is no way you can judge them all by the same standards so they judge them on other games of the same gener. If they do compare the platforms they will give which ever platform they like the most the best score. NEVER relile or reviews.
 

Julianking93

New member
May 16, 2009
14,715
0
0
I hardly ever trust game reviews. Especially from IGN.

[small/]Biased motherfuckers.[/small]
 

syndicated44

New member
Apr 25, 2009
1,009
0
0
I love reading reviews probably one of my favorite things to do when I am bored. What is important in reviews is to read a lot because their not all written by the same person. Overall they are just fun things to look at and experiance a different perspective from the game or have a basic overview if you are considering getting it.

I really like IGN's reviews even if they usually are not really reviews and just a guy who really likes the game spewing endless praise for it.
 

Kuchinawa212

New member
Apr 23, 2009
5,408
0
0
Well, A review is a review and that's just the reviewer opinion. Not mine. So I buy the game anyway. Only if I think I'd like it
 

SovietSecrets

iDrink, iSmoke, iPill
Nov 16, 2008
3,975
0
0
A review should just be something to check out once in a while if you are having serious doubts about a game you want to buy, otherwise get the demo. Play it for yourself rather then trusting a person you dont know.
 

Zallest

New member
Sep 25, 2008
393
0
0
... is this serious? reviews are just a opinion and entertainment
Who read/watches a game review and makes that the sole purpose on their game buying a game? Every game i've bought i have done my own indipendant research and looked at carefully before considering to buy it. Never pay attention to hype, anyone can create hype about a product.

Kuchinawa212 said:
Well, A review is a review and that's just the reviewer opinion. Not mine. So I buy the game anyway. Only if I think I'd like it
/agree
 

Flagcapper2k9

New member
May 6, 2009
17
0
0
Personally I stopped going to a lot of sites with game reviews. That is until I came across http://www.crispygamer.com/ , which to me differentiates from the gamespots and the IGN's both of which, to me have changed over the years.

I like their reviews(by system btw) and I haven't had a bad experience yet. When I can pull myself away from WoW I use their site for game recommendations, the latest being my purchase of Fat Princes(awesome!).
 

Superhyperactiveman

New member
Jul 23, 2009
396
0
0
This is why God created rental stores. "Try it, before you buy it!"

Now if only the only rental store within driving distance of my home had updated their selection in the past 60 years.
 

Spaceman_Spiff

New member
Apr 16, 2009
876
0
0
Emphraim said:
I'm pretty sure IGN has separate reviews for a game for each of its platforms. You also should never depend on reviews to tell you if a game is good. Check game play clips from fansites(not review sites), read comments and so on. Most importantly, hold off on buying a game for at least week after it comes out and read the game's forums for the reaction to the game. If it's operwhelmingly positive, get it. If it has more than 2 pages of rant threads then I don't get it. This saved me from Empire: Total War.
I wish I was a clever as you, what a waste of money that game was.
 

Bigeyez

New member
Apr 26, 2009
1,135
0
0
Zallest said:
... is this serious? reviews are just a opinion and entertainment
Who read/watches a game review and makes that the sole purpose on their game buying a game? Every game i've bought i have done my own indipendant research and looked at carefully before considering to buy it. Never pay attention to hype, anyone can create hype about a product.

Kuchinawa212 said:
Well, A review is a review and that's just the reviewer opinion. Not mine. So I buy the game anyway. Only if I think I'd like it
/agree
*Gaps!* Someone with common sense! ZOMGZ!!! But yeah it's up to the buyer to make sure what your buying is worth it. If you rely ONLY one or two reviews to buy your games don't be all pissy when you buy something that you don't like. After all game reviews are just some persons opinion and *dun dun duuuun* they might not always like the same things you do.
 

saintchristopher

Goes "Ding" When There's Stuff.
Aug 14, 2009
759
0
0
You honestly can only take a review so far.

Listen, art and artistic creations are inherently subjective experiences, which is why it's so hard to put a number or an amount of stars on something and take it seriously. You can quantify how well something is put together technically, sure. But to really be able to tell someone else with a straight face whether or not they will enjoy something based on YOUR experience is a fallacy.

There's no accounting for peoples' tastes; take the inexplicable Twilight phenomenon for example. I can review the entire series in two words for you: "Toilet paper." Yet there are obviously millions of people out there who swear by these books and love them to death!

So don't take a review (or even every review) as the last word on a game's quality. The only real thing that will determine whether or not you enjoy a game is your experience playing it.
 

HyenaThePirate

New member
Jan 8, 2009
1,412
0
0
Maybe I should explain it this way...

Of course one would be a fool to base his game purchasing on a review or even a handful of them.

But I use reviews as a way of researching a game before I purchase it. I could care less about some dude's opinions, but rather I'm seeking insight that might not be readily apparent from reading the back of the box and watching a gameplay trailer. For example, one can LOOK at ghostbusters the game and draw a general conclusion about how it plays, or an even better example is Iron Man the game... it looked great, seemed fun, and then... you actually had to play it, and thats when it all fell apart.

My major problem however is when there are absolutely NO reviews or anything else on which to try to get a feel for how a game's presentation or controls work or if there are game-breaking bugs that need serious patching. Without reviews or reviewers you'd have no choice but to go in completely blind (even renting games costs money and time and perhaps a trip to the store or at least post office if you are game fly'n). Once your money is gone it's gone, no tap backs.

I just despise how the entire industry conspires delaying game reviews until the last possible moment in order to disguise how crappy their work might have been. It's like a kid who is turning in his book report he had 3 months to work on, trying to slide a half-finished version in under the other kids who did theirs so that he wont be called out by the teacher immediately in shame.