Multiple exclamation marks.Fabian Stetter said:1) most sequels
2) QTEs!!!
3) X-Box Live !!!!!
DLC released simulatiusly with the main game - just add it in and dont be so desperate to scrape out those last pennies....
Multiple exclamation marks.Fabian Stetter said:1) most sequels
2) QTEs!!!
3) X-Box Live !!!!!
This, although I would say;Soveru said:The need for games to turn a profit.
That's true, however the problem could be avoided simply by staggering your console releases. GTA3-San Andreas comes to mind as games that were ported from one console to another perfectly- specifically because time was spent to do it properly long after the original had been released.Halo Fanboy said:The problem with doing away with exclusive development would that it would end up wasting a lot of dev money on unecessary or just bad (by either inability to work with the platform or the platform's own limitations) ports. I don't mind seeing a game on a single platform as long as it's well optimised for that platform.
DAMN NINJAS!!!! Ummm, GFWL. That piece of crap is, well, a piece of crap.rabidmidget said:Activision, it buys out smaller publishers and then cancels their products if they can't exploited to death with sequels, heck, they even treat their leading devs like crap.
I think America gets too much of a war-boner to sit wars out. Where else would we spend all our monies?Don said:America having to be the good guys/allies of the good guys in every game (could they not sit it out for just once?)
i knew this was going to be a bit stupid. your just asking for argument here arent you.Wondermint13 said:This can save us alot of time. Just fill in the blank.
The Gaming World would be a better place without ...... !
- Online Achievements
You will probably be hiding in the closet with the shotgun when I catch you.SentryGun said:It's a legitimate strategy!!! *flees*PureAussieGamer said:DAM CAMPERS!!!! you no who you are.
darkzero344 said:Quick Time Events
Torrasque said:Quick time events
Grouchy Imp said:QTEs, as a few people have said.
Wow...I really am the only one who like QTEs, aren't I?Fabian Stetter said:2) QTEs!!!
Oh, I guess you didn't realize that I had read your post like, one hour or so before replying. The thing is that this thread has been going on for two months, and I hadn't read it until yesterday.I don't need a better excuse. Taking two months to come up with a reply is a poor effort no matter how you look at it.
=|And yet, it's still heaps better than Apple. Interesting, eh?
Right, but my point wasn't that "they make different hardware", the point was that they all own their own stuff. That's what my point was. It doesn't matter whether or not the hardware is different, it's that everyone is in control of their own hardware/software/intellectual property.Um, yes they do- Competing companies make DVD and Blu Ray players, but every one of them must be able to play the same dvds and blu ray disks.
You're still taking it too literally. A channel would LIKE to have every show in the world on it, but they can't, because the people who produce the shows want to be viewed by a wider audience. You're getting so nitpicky, so particular, so "makes it sound logical" that it's actually getting really hard to argue against. You're misunderstanding the point so horribly that all I could hope to do was copy and paste my previous post all over again.TV networks compete to own broadcasting rights, but do they need to port a film reel when they want to show it on another channel? Of course not.
I never said that.you're assuming that if one company owns the console, suddenly they are also the only company making games for it.
Speaking of which, I believe you talk to a bizarro, alternate reality version of me and respond to him. That would explain why you keep doing all these straw-man fallacies with all the things I say.I'm not sure what bizarro land your logic originates from,
Including myself.Nobody ever said it'd be one company overlooking every aspect of every game made.
No, it wouldn't. Also, Z is the last letter of the alphabet, and I'm going to pretend you didn't know that and give you a big lecture on it.It doesn't work like that.
Yeah, any business would like to eliminate their competition. But it just doesn't work like that. There'd still be a monopoly on hardware, which would be big and powerful enough to do whatever it wants. Possibly a better example than Microsoft would be Wal-Mart; they're like the console that all the products are stored in. But because they're so powerful, they can bully the products into doing stuff that they might not want to do. Don't get that confused with the product companies not being able to compete (because they still do), they just can be given a rough time by the department store. As it is, Wal-Mart is decent enough to the point I wouldn't call them evil, or even super-mean, but imagine if one store was the only one you ever bought stuff from. Then it'd be a problem.The console makers would be only too happy to receive their former competitors' new games on their console- the existing fanbase for those companies would ensure continued support for their games.
Oh I'm pretty confident it'll keep going for the foreseeable future.Fair point, but you have to wonder how far they really need to go from here. It's not like progress would stop, anyway.
The assumption I never made....Only under your assumption that all other companies stop making games.
Because I didn't.I still can't work out how you arrived at that conclusion...
That IS one downside to it, yeah.I disagree. Competing consoles split the resources of multiplatform game development,
Now you've dug into what I think most people think to themselves when they decide that the one-console thing is a good idea: "I'll get to play all the games that come out!" But listen, that may be annoying for you, but it really won't help the industry all that much. Maybe in a small level, for a short time, the console would see more game sales because everyone has the same console, but in the long run, the sepp--and denies the majority of player bases from even experiencing an exclusive game.