The Gaming World would be a better place without....

Recommended Videos

GiglameshSoulEater

New member
Jun 30, 2010
582
0
0
Fabian Stetter said:
1) most sequels
2) QTEs!!!
3) X-Box Live !!!!!
Multiple exclamation marks.

DLC released simulatiusly with the main game - just add it in and dont be so desperate to scrape out those last pennies....
 

thedevilscousin

New member
Nov 14, 2010
193
0
0
I'll be honest, Xbox live.
And no i'm not a ps3 fag, i own an Xbox and am on Xbox live and i don't exactly dislike the store but the people on Xbox live.... actually i've heard PSN is no better but i only use that on the PS store so... yeah.
 

RuralGamer

New member
Jan 1, 2011
953
0
0
Soveru said:
The need for games to turn a profit.
This, although I would say;
"The need to for games to turn a profit NOW!" There are far too many games out there that could have been twice as good had their publishers been patient enough to give the developers another six months.

OT:
The need for games to reach as wide an audience as possible.
Killstreaks that unbalance the game further
Grenade spam
Awful movie tie-ins, aka £££££!!!!!!!
Predictable cliches, betrayals, villains and plot-twists
Excessive scripting
America having to be the good guys/allies of the good guys in every game (could they not sit it out for just once?)
Crappy internet connections that ruin multiplayer for more rural people (like myself)
User-throttling DRM
Shallow characters, who are sometimes deliberately designed to be controversial

That's all I have
 

Squilookle

New member
Nov 6, 2008
3,584
0
0
Halo Fanboy said:
The problem with doing away with exclusive development would that it would end up wasting a lot of dev money on unecessary or just bad (by either inability to work with the platform or the platform's own limitations) ports. I don't mind seeing a game on a single platform as long as it's well optimised for that platform.
That's true, however the problem could be avoided simply by staggering your console releases. GTA3-San Andreas comes to mind as games that were ported from one console to another perfectly- specifically because time was spent to do it properly long after the original had been released.
 

Michelle Weiss

New member
Jan 5, 2011
79
0
0
games based on movies

Bad dubbing {looking at you FFX}

games/upgrades/story you can only get online (all gamers don't have internet you know)

more cutscenes than gameplay (i want to PLAY not watch a movie)
 

Uber Evil

New member
Mar 4, 2009
1,108
0
0
rabidmidget said:
Activision, it buys out smaller publishers and then cancels their products if they can't exploited to death with sequels, heck, they even treat their leading devs like crap.
DAMN NINJAS!!!! Ummm, GFWL. That piece of crap is, well, a piece of crap.
Don said:
America having to be the good guys/allies of the good guys in every game (could they not sit it out for just once?)
I think America gets too much of a war-boner to sit wars out. Where else would we spend all our monies?
 

CardinalPiggles

New member
Jun 24, 2010
3,226
0
0
Wondermint13 said:
This can save us alot of time. Just fill in the blank.

The Gaming World would be a better place without ...... !

- Online Achievements
i knew this was going to be a bit stupid. your just asking for argument here arent you.
 

gabe12301

New member
Jun 30, 2010
1,371
0
0
SentryGun said:
PureAussieGamer said:
DAM CAMPERS!!!! you no who you are.
It's a legitimate strategy!!! *flees*
You will probably be hiding in the closet with the shotgun when I catch you.

On Topic: Montages. When your whole team is trying to get material for their 1337 lul 5n1pz0rz Montage they are no help at all. once my whole team got killed trying to stop one guy because they were trying to 360 no scope him.
 

Spartan448

New member
Apr 2, 2011
539
0
0
Cpl. Dunn.

"AIM DOWN YOUR SIGHTS!"
"SWITCH TO YOUR PISTOL, IT'S FASTER THAN RELOADING!"
"NAG NAG NAG NAG NAG!"

I am not a big CoD fan, especially not of the Modern Warefare subseries, but I would've really liked MW2, had it not been for Dunn yelling at me the whole time during that STUPID F****** TUTORIAL! I KNOW HOW TO PRESS RT AND LT AT THE SAME TIME!

(eventually I just chucked a grenade up there, but I missed. :( )
 

drh1975

New member
Dec 8, 2010
168
0
0
QTEs, overly-vocal fanboys/fangirls, MMOs, RTSs, and haters. Can't we gamers all just try to get along? I've had it with ignorant people saying one console manufacturer is better than the others. And would the God of War franchise suffered without QTEs breaking up the hacking and slashing? One other thing the gaming world could do without is critics who won't shut the fuck up about their favorite franchises. And yes, I am talking about G4's Morgan Webb. We get it, princess, you love World of Warcraft, Call of Duty and Halo. Find something else to talk about.
 

hexFrank202

New member
Mar 21, 2010
303
0
0
I don't need a better excuse. Taking two months to come up with a reply is a poor effort no matter how you look at it.
Oh, I guess you didn't realize that I had read your post like, one hour or so before replying. The thing is that this thread has been going on for two months, and I hadn't read it until yesterday.

And yet, it's still heaps better than Apple. Interesting, eh?
=|

Okay, I'm not even going to get into the AppleMicrosoft battle. I'll let you have that one.



Um, yes they do- Competing companies make DVD and Blu Ray players, but every one of them must be able to play the same dvds and blu ray disks.
Right, but my point wasn't that "they make different hardware", the point was that they all own their own stuff. That's what my point was. It doesn't matter whether or not the hardware is different, it's that everyone is in control of their own hardware/software/intellectual property.


TV networks compete to own broadcasting rights, but do they need to port a film reel when they want to show it on another channel? Of course not.
You're still taking it too literally. A channel would LIKE to have every show in the world on it, but they can't, because the people who produce the shows want to be viewed by a wider audience. You're getting so nitpicky, so particular, so "makes it sound logical" that it's actually getting really hard to argue against. You're misunderstanding the point so horribly that all I could hope to do was copy and paste my previous post all over again.

So no, it really is you who can't see it.


you're assuming that if one company owns the console, suddenly they are also the only company making games for it.
I never said that.


I'm not sure what bizarro land your logic originates from,
Speaking of which, I believe you talk to a bizarro, alternate reality version of me and respond to him. That would explain why you keep doing all these straw-man fallacies with all the things I say.


Nobody ever said it'd be one company overlooking every aspect of every game made.
Including myself.


It doesn't work like that.
No, it wouldn't. Also, Z is the last letter of the alphabet, and I'm going to pretend you didn't know that and give you a big lecture on it.


The console makers would be only too happy to receive their former competitors' new games on their console- the existing fanbase for those companies would ensure continued support for their games.
Yeah, any business would like to eliminate their competition. But it just doesn't work like that. There'd still be a monopoly on hardware, which would be big and powerful enough to do whatever it wants. Possibly a better example than Microsoft would be Wal-Mart; they're like the console that all the products are stored in. But because they're so powerful, they can bully the products into doing stuff that they might not want to do. Don't get that confused with the product companies not being able to compete (because they still do), they just can be given a rough time by the department store. As it is, Wal-Mart is decent enough to the point I wouldn't call them evil, or even super-mean, but imagine if one store was the only one you ever bought stuff from. Then it'd be a problem.


Fair point, but you have to wonder how far they really need to go from here. It's not like progress would stop, anyway.
Oh I'm pretty confident it'll keep going for the foreseeable future.


...Only under your assumption that all other companies stop making games.
The assumption I never made.


I still can't work out how you arrived at that conclusion...
Because I didn't.


I disagree. Competing consoles split the resources of multiplatform game development,
That IS one downside to it, yeah.

and denies the majority of player bases from even experiencing an exclusive game.
Now you've dug into what I think most people think to themselves when they decide that the one-console thing is a good idea: "I'll get to play all the games that come out!" But listen, that may be annoying for you, but it really won't help the industry all that much. Maybe in a small level, for a short time, the console would see more game sales because everyone has the same console, but in the long run, the sepp--

Okay you know, I'm tired of this conversation. It doesn't really matter whether or not you think it's a good idea, of if you feel like you're right, or anything, because it won't ever happen. AND, if--as you said--it theoretically did happen, I definitely wouldn't have to argue about it; I'd only have to wait a few years and let the reality of what happens speak for itself.
 

Aetera

New member
Jan 19, 2011
760
0
0
It's probably been said a million times, but quick time events. Also, random stealth levels in non-stealth games.
 

LordSnakeEyes

New member
Mar 9, 2009
274
0
0
- The Words: N00b (or any derivative), Basement Dweller and any minority aimed accusation.

- Online players who go apeshit on that one female gamer/gay kid/any other minority

- Ignorant Non-Gamers who judge from ignorance (Fox News.)

- Gaming Companies not willing to invest in/ risk it with innovation for AAA titles

- The *Massive* sexism most women in games are portrayed with (which as of late is being called out more and more thank you very much Escapist readers :) and game developpers)

- First Person Shooters (Don't get me wrong, great genre. But the games industry is cashing into it too much. Quality control would be nice, so we might get more Halo/CoD/Crysis 2 in the world... *prays Brink will kick as much ass as it forebodes*)

- Morality Meters (Again, a nuanced statement. In fairytale games like Fable; Awesome idea, in more... "realistic" games, like Fallout, Mass Effect and so on, I argue that few choices in life are black and white... But I'm pretty sure someone mentionned this somewhere before...)

- Bad Games (I'm looking at YOU; Too Human.)