Sports games. They usually have pretty dodgy physics, and If I wanted to play football(Soccer) id go outside and play it. The only kind that is MILDLY appealing, is the manager type games
What?Cry Wolf said:I'd go as far as saying I loathe fighting games. A genre of games that are purely about violence and particularly shallow game play. Seriously, guys? Why do these still exist?
Right, because you can now give me an example of a fighting game that is deeper than its mechanics. Simply taking a position to the contrary does not make me wrong. As for shooters, those that are purely about the glorification of violence I still oppose. The difference is I can think of shooters that aren't about the glorification of violence. As for fighting games...-Seraph- said:I have pretty broad tastes and willing to try any genre really. I can find a game I enjoy from almost any genre, though there are a few I just have little interest in. I don't care for sim games, sports games, and any racing game that isn't Wipeout....everything else is fine with me.
What?Cry Wolf said:I'd go as far as saying I loathe fighting games. A genre of games that are purely about violence and particularly shallow game play. Seriously, guys? Why do these still exist?
OK I got no problem with people not liking fighting games, fine; they ain't for everyone. But to call the genre shallow is so horribly and factually WRONG it leaves me damn near speechless. Fighting games are one of the deepest game genres to exist up there with strategy games. It's a whole lot more then two dudes punching each other until one of their health bars is depleted.
Purely about violence? how's that different from say...shooters? That is merely a surface level thing that is not the primary focus of the game funny enough, just a means to an end. But I'll let that pass, because that is more semantics than anything.
The depth of a fighting game lies entirely in its mechanics, just like strategy games, and hell even sports games. Not every game or genre for that matter needs to have an expressed depth in its story or characters and all that jazz because that is not the purpose of the game. These are games purely about 1 on 1 challenge, everything else is merely a secondary focus, because really...why are you playing a fighting game for the story? Those are nothing more than glorified tutorials and flavor text to give characters some personality.Cry Wolf said:Right, because you can now give me an example of a fighting game that is deeper than its mechanics. Simply taking a position to the contrary does not make me wrong. As for shooters, those that are purely about the glorification of violence I still oppose. The difference is I can think of shooters that aren't about the glorification of violence. As for fighting games...-Seraph- said:I have pretty broad tastes and willing to try any genre really. I can find a game I enjoy from almost any genre, though there are a few I just have little interest in. I don't care for sim games, sports games, and any racing game that isn't Wipeout....everything else is fine with me.
What?Cry Wolf said:I'd go as far as saying I loathe fighting games. A genre of games that are purely about violence and particularly shallow game play. Seriously, guys? Why do these still exist?
OK I got no problem with people not liking fighting games, fine; they ain't for everyone. But to call the genre shallow is so horribly and factually WRONG it leaves me damn near speechless. Fighting games are one of the deepest game genres to exist up there with strategy games. It's a whole lot more then two dudes punching each other until one of their health bars is depleted.
Purely about violence? how's that different from say...shooters? That is merely a surface level thing that is not the primary focus of the game funny enough, just a means to an end. But I'll let that pass, because that is more semantics than anything.
Yeah, no.
I think the last Military shooter with swimmable water would be Battlefield 3. But I couldn't say for sure.xPixelatedx said:First person Shooters. Don't get me wrong I still play them from time to time, but umm, yeah, not the biggest fan, at all. They've become far too simplistic in this day and age, and just not my coup of tea. I used to absolutely love games like Turok, Duke Nukem, Doom, and Golden eye, but all for reasons outside of the fact that you were in FPS view and shooting a gun. Now that's the selling point, and aside form running in hallways and shooting other people, there isn't much going on. Hell, even putting aside the retardedly simplistic level design and lack of puzzles, I don't remember the last new FPS that had swim-able water! That's how simple and boring these games have gotten, water is too advanced and colorful for them now.
And yeah, I blame CoD since most developers admit they are just trying to copy that formula, even if they aren't making FPS games! *CoughRE6Cough*