I'm a war film Buff. I grew up watching films like Apocalypse Now and Full Metal Jacket. I can quote nearly every single line Gunnery Sergeant Hartman speaks. However, I was disappointed with the quality of the films about Iraq such as Stop Loss and Jarhead (to be fair Jarhead was about the First Gulf War), but still, it was lower than my expectations. That was until the Hurt Locker came. My father, who serves in the military, thought the movie was 99% realistic. True, the bomb squad soldiers would normally never act alone without backup and sneaking off the FOB and running after terrorists in the dark without backup and the fact that a soldier plays Gears of War two years before its released aren't realistic. But hey, it's a movie, it needs to have some dramatic tension. I think the movie rather accurately depicted the soldier's emotions and personal agonies in a without having a raging political/patriotic message riveted to it. *cough*avatar*cough. Oh, and one last thing people keep getting wrong: THERE ARE NO FUCKING SAS IN THE MOVIE! BEING BRITISH AND HAVING GUNS DOESN'T MAKE YOU SAS! THEY ARE CONTRACTORS! THEY DIED BECAUSE THEY GOT AMBUSHED, NOT BECAUSE THEY SUCK MORE THAN AMERICANS! So, what did you think about the movie?