Matthew94 said:http://www.3dsbuzz.com/
3DS Buzz is already down in protest.
Yes, this is real and he actually said this.It is an irresponsible response and a disservice to people who rely on them for information and use their services. It is also an abuse of power given the freedoms these companies enjoy in the marketplace today. It's a dangerous and troubling development when the platforms that serve as gateways to information intentionally skew the facts to incite their users in order to further their corporate interests.
well tommorow would be a good time to black out because of zero punctuation and the traffic that bringsjustcallmeslow said:Why would the Escapist bother going down? Almost all its visitors know SOPA and PIPA are bad and it's not a big enough site to attract mainstream media attention. Wikipedia is probably the site which will cause the biggest shockwaves, unless Google joins in. It's all about causing disruption and mking more people aware of the issue.seraphy said:So I guess escapist isn't blacking out tomorrow?
Bit of shame actually I think. In my opinion it seems only sites which take part of this are taking the threat of sopa seriously.
But well as it usually is profits > giving a damn.
Sure. Now let me think of a song that isn't copyrighted.... oh yeah NONE.FalloutJack said:*Starts passing around candles*
Anyone care for a round of singing?
That would require faith in the MPAA and the like to use this bill only for enforcing copyright law. They will not. The constantly abuse the DMCA to take things down that break no laws, regardless of if they violate copyright or not.Regnes said:I just hate the whole thing because the anti-SOPA protests are so full of ignorance and misinformation that it just makes protesters look like a bunch of tools.
I agree that SOPA is a flawed piece of legislation and that it probably shouldn't be passed, but labeling it as a censorship bill makes you look like a supreme idiot. ENFORCING COPYRIGHT LAW IS NOT CENSORSHIP, the first amendment or any other free speech laws do not go hand in hand with general anarchy on the internet.
If I broke into your home, stole a bunch of your property, brought it over to my home and set up a shop selling your goods, would it make sense if I told you that you can't do anything about it because I have a right to freedom of speech?
"It is also an abuse of power given the freedoms these companies enjoy in the marketplace today"Irridium said:http://gizmodo.com/5876984/the-mpaa-says-blackout-protests-are-an-abuse-of-power?utm_medium=twitter&utm_source=twitterfeed
The MPAA are saying that these blackouts being done by big websites are an abuse of power, and are being done to further their own corporate interests.
No, you're right that it's not changing any of that. What it's changing is it's taking the power from the people who's job is to protect us (whether they do that or not is up for debate) and putting it in the hands of those who's job is to protect their bottom line. How this doesn't sound like lunacy to you is beyond me.Regnes said:I understand this is what is scaring a lot of people, but as far as I can gather, this bill isn't changing legal definitions of what constitutes copyright infringement, there will still be such a thing as fair use, and if they abuse it, they're going to lose it.Irridium said:Regnes said:I just hate the whole thing because the anti-SOPA protests are so full of ignorance and misinformation that it just makes protesters look like a bunch of tools.
I agree that SOPA is a flawed piece of legislation and that it probably shouldn't be passed, but labeling it as a censorship bill makes you look like a supreme idiot. ENFORCING COPYRIGHT LAW IS NOT CENSORSHIP, the first amendment or any other free speech laws do not go hand in hand with general anarchy on the internet.
If I broke into your home, stole a bunch of your property, brought it over to my home and set up a shop selling your goods, would it make sense if I told you that you can't do anything about it because I have a right to freedom of speech?
companies will try to censor things they simply don't like, or things they even think is infringing copyright of any kind.
They've been abusing the DMCA pretty much since its inception in 1999. And that law is still here.Regnes said:I understand this is what is scaring a lot of people, but as far as I can gather, this bill isn't changing legal definitions of what constitutes copyright infringement, there will still be such a thing as fair use, and if they abuse it, they're going to lose it.Irridium said:Regnes said:I just hate the whole thing because the anti-SOPA protests are so full of ignorance and misinformation that it just makes protesters look like a bunch of tools.
I agree that SOPA is a flawed piece of legislation and that it probably shouldn't be passed, but labeling it as a censorship bill makes you look like a supreme idiot. ENFORCING COPYRIGHT LAW IS NOT CENSORSHIP, the first amendment or any other free speech laws do not go hand in hand with general anarchy on the internet.
If I broke into your home, stole a bunch of your property, brought it over to my home and set up a shop selling your goods, would it make sense if I told you that you can't do anything about it because I have a right to freedom of speech?
companies will try to censor things they simply don't like, or things they even think is infringing copyright of any kind.